Skip to main content

An Incremental MaxSAT-Based Model to Learn Interpretable and Balanced Classification Rules

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems (BRACIS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14195))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

The increasing advancements in the field of machine learning have led to the development of numerous applications that effectively address a wide range of problems with accurate predictions. However, in certain cases, accuracy alone may not be sufficient. Many real-world problems also demand explanations and interpretability behind the predictions. One of the most popular interpretable models that are classification rules. This work aims to propose an incremental model for learning interpretable and balanced rules based on MaxSAT, called IMLIB. This new model was based on two other approaches, one based on SAT and the other on MaxSAT. The one based on SAT limits the size of each generated rule, making it possible to balance them. We suggest that such a set of rules seem more natural to be understood compared to a mixture of large and small rules. The approach based on MaxSAT, called IMLI, presents a technique to increase performance that involves learning a set of rules by incrementally applying the model in a dataset. Finally, IMLIB and IMLI are compared using diverse databases. IMLIB obtained results comparable to IMLI in terms of accuracy, generating more balanced rules with smaller sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source code of IMLIB and the implementation of the tests performed can be found at the link: https://github.com/cacajr/decision_set_models.

References

  1. Biran, O., Cotton, C.: Explanation and justification in machine learning: a survey. In: IJCAI-17 Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI), vol. 8, pp. 8–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carleo, G., et al.: Machine learning and the physical sciences. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91(4), 045002 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dua, D., Graff, C.: UCI machine learning repository (2017). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  4. Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L., Beam, A.L.: The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. Lancet Digit. Health 3(11), e745–e750 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh, B., Malioutov, D., Meel, K.S.: Efficient learning of interpretable classification rules. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 74, 1823–1863 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh, B., Meel, K.S.: IMLI: an incremental framework for MaxSAT-based learning of interpretable classification rules. In: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 203–210 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunning, D., Stefik, M., Choi, J., Miller, T., Stumpf, S., Yang, G.Z.: XAI-explainable artificial intelligence. Sci. Robot. 4(37), eaay7120 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, H.Y., et al.: Power of data in quantum machine learning. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 2631 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ignatiev, A., Marques-Silva, J., Narodytska, N., Stuckey, P.J.: Reasoning-based learning of interpretable ML models. In: IJCAI, pp. 4458–4465 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ignatiev, A., Morgado, A., Marques-Silva, J.: RC2: an efficient MaxSAT solver. J. Satisfiability Boolean Modeling Comput. 11(1), 53–64 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ignatiev, A., Pereira, F., Narodytska, N., Marques-Silva, J.: A SAT-based approach to learn explainable decision sets. In: Galmiche, D., Schulz, S., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) IJCAR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10900, pp. 627–645. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94205-6_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., Heinrich, K.: Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Mark. 31(3), 685–695 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiménez-Luna, J., Grisoni, F., Schneider, G.: Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligence. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2(10), 573–584 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwekha-Rashid, A.S., Abduljabbar, H.N., Alhayani, B.: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases analysis using machine-learning applications. Appl. Nanosci. 1–13 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lakkaraju, H., Bach, S.H., Leskovec, J.: Interpretable decision sets: a joint framework for description and prediction. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1675–1684 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maliotov, D., Meel, K.S.: MLIC: a MaxSAT-based framework for learning interpretable classification rules. In: Hooker, J. (ed.) CP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11008, pp. 312–327. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Mita, G., Papotti, P., Filippone, M., Michiardi, P.: LIBRE: learning interpretable Boolean rule ensembles. In: AISTATS, pp. 245–255. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rocha, T.A., Martins, A.T.: Synthesis of quantifier-free first-order sentences from noisy samples of strings. In: 2019 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), pp. 12–17. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rocha, T.A., Martins, A.T., Ferreira, F.M.: Synthesis of a DNF formula from a sample of strings using Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 805, 109–126 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma, A., Jain, A., Gupta, P., Chowdary, V.: Machine learning applications for precision agriculture: a comprehensive review. IEEE Access 9, 4843–4873 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tjoa, E., Guan, C.: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): toward medical XAI. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32(11), 4793–4813 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilone, G., Longo, L.: Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence. Inf. Fusion 76, 89–106 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan, L., et al.: An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2(5), 283–288 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, J., Ignatiev, A., Stuckey, P.J., Le Bodic, P.: Computing optimal decision sets with SAT. In: Simonis, H. (ed.) CP 2020. LNCS, vol. 12333, pp. 952–970. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58475-7_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antônio Carlos Souza Ferreira Júnior .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferreira Júnior, A.C.S., Rocha, T.A. (2023). An Incremental MaxSAT-Based Model to Learn Interpretable and Balanced Classification Rules. In: Naldi, M.C., Bianchi, R.A.C. (eds) Intelligent Systems. BRACIS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14195. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45368-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45368-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45367-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45368-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics