skip to main content
10.1145/3424953.3426626acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Accessibility, usability and user experience design for visually impaired people: a systematic mapping study

Published:23 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can be an important ally in improving the quality of life of Visually Impaired People (VIP) because they provide greater independence in the performance of their daily tasks. During the development process of ICTs for VIP, the concepts of Accessibility, Usability, and User eXperience (UX) are significant because they can positively influence the system's quality. Concerning these concepts, some improvements can be considered already at the design stage, such as screen size, button format, color density, among others. However, not all designers consider Accessibility, Usability, and UX concepts when designing ICT for VIP. To identify and characterize which design technologies of Accessibility, Usability, and UX have been proposed in the literature, we performed a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS). We identified a total of 23 technologies. The analysis from these technologies showed that the majority are destined for mobile applications. Besides, some design technologies only address the concept of Accessibility, and only one technology considered the concepts of Accessibility, Usability, and UX together. To support professionals, students, and researchers in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Software Engineering (SE), this SMS presents a set of Accessibility, Usability, and UX design technologies, which can be used in the initial phases of the ICT development process for VIP.

References

  1. Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), 2003. Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionadas à Saúde - Décima Revisão. 10. rev. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), 2019. Em primeiro relatório global sobre cegueira, OMS diz que mundo poderia evitar metade dos casos". Acessado em Maio de 2020. Disponível em <https://news.un.org/pt/story/2019/10/1690122>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Woo Jin Kim, Il Kon Kim, Min Ji Kim, Eunjoo Lee, 2018. Effect of UX Design Guideline on the information accessibility for the visually impaired in the mobile health apps. In IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Madrid, Spain, pp. 1103--1106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Miguel, José P., David Mauricio, and Glen Rodríguez, 2014. A review of software quality models for the evaluation of software products. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.5, No.6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Word Wide Web Consortium (W3C). 2016. Web accessibility evaluation tools list. Acessado em Abril de 2020. Disponível em <https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ISO 9241-11, 2018. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ISO DIS 9241-210, 2010. International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alistair Sutcliffe e Jennefer Hart, 2013. Some reflections on evaluating users' experience. Which is commonly known as TwinTide (Towards the Integration of Trans-sectorial IT Design. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 67--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Vladimir Tomberg e Mart Laanpere, 2014. Teaching Design for All Through Empathic Modeling: A Case Study in Tallinn University. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools, pp. 259--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Barbosa, Simone, and Bruno Silva, 2010. Interação humano-computador. Elsevier Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. João Silva, Ramiro Gonçalves, José Martins, Frederico Branco, António Pereira, 2018. Accessibility in Software Engineering: Pursuing the Mainstream from a Classroom. In International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Learning and Teaching. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 10925, pp. 505--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Natasha M. Costa Valentim, Tayana Uchôa Conte, 2015. Framework que apoia a Antecipação da Usabilidade nas Fases Iniciais do Processo de Desenvolvimento de Software. In: II Workshop de Teses e Dissertações em IHC (WTDIHC 2015), Salvador. 2015. v. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Godoi, Tatiany X., Deógenes P. da Silva Junior, and Natasha M. Costa Valentim, 2020. About Usability, User Experience and Accessibility Problems of Deaf Users with Assistive Technologies In: International Conference on. Human-Computer Interaction, HCI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Barbara Kitchenham e Stuart Charters, 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. (University of Durham, Durham).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rafael Jeferson Pezzuto Damaceno, Juliana Cristina Braga, Jesús Pascual Mena Chalco, 2016. Mobile Device Accessibility for the Visually Impaired: Problems Mapping and Empirical Study of Touch Screen. In XV Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC), São Paulo, Brazil, Artigo No 2, pp. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Barbara Cristina A. Silveira, Thiago Silva-de-Souza, Ana Regina Cavalcanti Da Rocha., 2018. Software Accessibility for Visually Impaired People: a systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Software (SBQS), pp. 190--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 25010, 2011. Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models. International Organization for Standardization, p. 1--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Giovanna Magda S. Silva, Rossana M De C. Andrade, Ticianne De Gois R. Darin, 2019. Design and Evaluation of Mobile Applications for People with Visual Impairments: A Compilation of Usable Accessibility Guidelines. In 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC), Artigo No 21, pp. 1--10., Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. ISO. 9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). The international organization for standardization, v.45, p. 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Victor Robert Basili e Dieter Rombach, 1988. The TAME project: Towards improvement-oriented software environments. In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v. 14(6), pp. 758--773. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Definitions of Low Vision, 2016. Acessado em Setembro de 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Definitions_of_Low_Vision>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Forrest Joseph Shull, Jeff Carver, Guilherme Horta Travassos, 2001. An empirical methodology for introducing software processes. In ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v. 26 (5), pp. 288 -- 296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Magnus C Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, Anders Wesslén, 2000. Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 236 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Cínthia Costa Kulpa, Fábio Gonçalves Teixeira, Régio Pierre da Silva, 2013. A color model in the usability of computer interface applied to users with low vision. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (DUXU), pp. 330--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gabriel L. Pita, Diego Zabot, Jean C. S. Rosa, Ecivaldo Matos, 2017. Adapting the SPIDe to Include Visually Impaired Users in Interaction Design. In XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC), Joinville, Artigo No. 53, pp. 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Laura A. C. Rodrigues e Soraia S. Prietch, 2018. Analysis, Redesign and Validation of Accessibility Resources Applied to an Official Electronic Journal for the Promotion of Equal Access to Public Acts. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors. In Computing Systems (IHC), Belém, Artigo No. 8, pp. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Daniela Napoli, 2018. Developing Accessible and Usable Security (ACCUS) Heuristics. In: Conference on Human Factors. In Computing Systems (CHI), Montréal, QC, Canada, pp. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sandra Sanchez-Gordon, Mary Sánchez-Gordón, Murat Yilmaz, Rory V. O'Connor, 2018. Integration of accessibility design patterns with the software implementation process of ISO/IEC 29110. In Journal of Software: Evolution and Process (WILEY), v. 31(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Clauirton Siebra, Tatiana B Gouveia, Jefté Macêdo, Walter F Correia, Marcelo Penha, Marcelo Anjos, Fabiana Florentin, Fábio Q. B Da Silva, Andre Luis de Medeiros Santos, 2016. Observation Based Analysis on the Use of Mobile Applications for Visually Impaired Users. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI), Florence, Italy, pp. 807--814. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Muhammad Shafiq, Jin-Ghoo Choi, Muddesar Iqbal, Muhammad Faheem, Maqbool Ahmad, Imran Ashraf, Azeem Irshad, 2014. Skill Specific Spoken Dialogues Based Personalized ATM Design to Maximize Effective Interaction for Visually Impaired Persona. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (DUXU). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8520, pp. 446--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sandeep R. Patil, 2007. Position Paper: Accessible Image File Formats - The Need and the Way. In 16th International World Wide Web Conference (W4A), Banff, Canada, pp. 40 -- 43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pascal Hamisu, Gregor Heinrich, Christoph Jung, Volker Hahn, Carlos Duarte, Pat Langdon, Pradipta Biswas, 2011. Accessible UI Design and Multimodal Interaction through Hybrid TV Platforms: Towards a Virtual-user Centered Design Framework. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Users Diversity (UAHCI), IFIP AICT 299, pp. 237--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kristen Shinohara, Jacob O Wobbrock, Wanda Marie Pratt, 2018. Incorporating Social Factors in Accessible Design. In International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS), Galway, Ireland, pp. 149 -- 160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hsinfu Huang, 2018. Blind users' expectations of touch interfaces: factors affecting interface accessibility of touchscreen-based smartphones for people with moderate visual impairment. In Universal Access in the Information Society, v. 17, pp. 291--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Viktor Stadler e Helmut Hlavacs, 2018. Blind Adventure - A Game Engine for Blind Game Designers. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI Play). Melbourne, VIC, Australia, pp. 503--509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Imran Khaliq e Isabelle Dela Torre, 2019. A Study on Accessibility in Games for the Visually Impaired. In Proceedings of the 5th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (GoodTechs). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, Jon E. Froehlich, 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. In ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Artigo 9, 27 páginas. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Woo Jin Kim, Il Kon Kim, Man Ki Jeon, Jongoh Kim, 2016. UX Design Guideline for Health Mobile Application to Improve Accessibility for the Visually Impaired. In International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon), Jeju, 2016, pp. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Simon Harper, Carole Goble, Robert David Stevens, 2003. Traversing the Web: mobility heuristics for visually impaired surfers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE), Rome, Italy, 2003, pp. 200--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Na Mi, Lora A. Cavuoto, Kenneth Benson, Tonya Smith-Jackson, Maury A. Nussbaum, 2014. A heuristic checklist for an accessible smartphone interface design. In Universal Access in the Information Society, v. 13, pp. 351--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. João Sousa e Silva, Ramiro Gonçalves, Frederico Branco, António Pereira, Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, José Martins, 2019. Accessible software development: a conceptual model proposal. In Universal Access. In the Information Society, v. 18, pp. 703--716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Internet Data Center (IDC), 2020. Smartphone Market share, 2020. Acessado em Maio de 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.idc.com/promo/smartphone-market-share/os>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. GSMA, 2020. The Mobile Economy. Acessado em Maio de 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ana Flavia de Andrade da Silva, Annibal Biondi Mendes Da Silva, Veronica Oliveira Pontes, Elaine Naomi Watanabe, Márcia Ito profile imageMarcia Ito, Vagner Figueredo de Santana, 2013. Estudo sobre o uso de tablets como ferramenta de suporte à interação de pessoas cegas com painéis digitais. In Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC), Manaus, pp. 268--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Apostolos Ampatzoglou, Stamatia Bibi, Paris Avgeriou, Marijn Verbeek, Alexander Chatzigeorgiou, 2019. Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies. In Information and Software Technology, v. 106, pp. 201--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jalali, Samireh, and Claes Wohlin. 2012. Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. IEEE. pp. 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Accessibility, usability and user experience design for visually impaired people: a systematic mapping study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '20: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2020
      519 pages
      ISBN:9781450381727
      DOI:10.1145/3424953

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 December 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate60of155submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader