Eliane Zambon Victorelli
ABSTRACT
The design of interactive visualization systems is challenging due to several aspects involving data interpretation and manipulation mechanisms. Designers need adequate support in the conception of these tools for facilitating the interaction of users with data. In this article, we propose a set of design guidelines on Human-Data Interaction (HDI) with focus on information visualization (IV). Our recommendations were elaborated based on analysis and summary of knowledge from literature, combined with our own design experience with this kind of systems. This study shows to which extent the organized guidelines were understood, used and discussed by Computer Science students in the construction and evaluation of software prototypes for data-driven decision making. Participants were able to understand the guidelines and applied them with success for evaluation of HDI in IV systems.
- David V. Beard and John Q. Walker II. 1990. Navigational techniques to improve the display of large two-dimensional spaces. Behaviour and Information Technology 9, 6 (1990), 451--466.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- F. Brooks. 1987. No Silver Bullet Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering. Computer 20 (1987), 10--19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davide Ceneda, Theresia Gschwandtner, Thorsten May, Silvia Miksch, Hans Jorg Schulz, Marc Streit, and Christian Tominski. 2017. Characterizing Guidance in Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 111--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andy Cockburn, Amy Karlson, and Benjamin B Bederson. 2009. A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 41, 1 (2009), 2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan Dix, Janet Finlay, Gregory D Abowd, and Russell Beale. 2004. Human-Computer Interaction (third ed.). Pearson, Englewood Cliffs. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niklas Elmqvist. 2011. Embodied Human-Data Interaction. ACM CHI 2011 Workshop "Embodied Interaction: Theory and Practice in HCI 1 (2011), 104--107.Google Scholar
- Niklas Elmqvist, Andrew Vande Moere, Hans Christian Jetter, Daniel Cernea, Harald Reiterer, and T. J. Jankun-Kelly. 2011. Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization 10, 4 (2011), 327--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Endert. 2014. Semantic interaction for visual analytics: Toward coupling cognition and computation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 34, 4 (2014), 8--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex Endert, Patrick Fiaux, and Chris North. 2012. Semantic interaction for visual text analytics. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 1 (2012), 473--482. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Heer and Ben Shneiderman. 2012. Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. Queue 10, 2 (2012), 30--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heiko Hornung, Roberto Pereira, M Cecilia C Baranauskas, and Kecheng Liu. 2015. Challenges for Human-Data Interaction - A Semiotic Perspective. Springer 9169 (2015), 37--48.Google Scholar
- Daniel A. Keim and Hans Peter Kriegel. 1994. VisDB: Database Exploration Using Multidimensional Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 14, 5 (1994), 40--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonas Lowgren. 2009. Interaction Design - brief intro., 91 pages.Google Scholar
- Patricia Martín-Rodilla, José Ignacio Panach, and Oscar Pastor. 2014. User interface design guidelines for rich applications in the context of cultural heritage data. Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science 1 (2014), 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society. SSRN Electronic Journal 1 (2014), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems 1 (1994), 152--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, Philadelphia, PA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A Norman and Stephen W Draper. 1986. User centered system design; new perspectives on human-computer interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 365 Broadway Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer Preece, Yvonne Rogers, and Helen Sharp. 2002. Interaction Design - beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. IEEE, Boulder, CO, USA, 336--343. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Thomas and Kristin Cook. 2005. Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. IEEE Computer Society 1 (2005), 184.Google Scholar
- Barbara Tversky, Julie Bauer Morrison, and Mireille Betrancourt. 2002. Animation: can it facilitate? Int. J. Human-Computer Studies Schnotz & Kulhavy 57 (2002), 247--262. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jaime Urquiza-fuentes and Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide. 2005. R-Zoom: A Visualization Technique For Algorithm Animation Construction. In IADIS International Conference on Applied Computing. Portugal, 145--152.Google Scholar
- Eliane Zambon Victorelli, Julio Cesar dos Reis, Heiko Hornung, and Alysson Bolognesi Prado. 2020. Understanding human-data interaction: Literature review and recommendations for design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 134 (2020), 13 -- 32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eliane Zambon Victorelli, Julio Cesar dos Reis, Antonio Alberto Souza Santos, and Denis José Schiozer. 2019. Participatory Evaluation of Human-Data Interaction Design Guidelines. In INTERACT 2019. Springer, Cham, 475--494.Google Scholar
- Eliane Zambon Victorelli, Julio Cesar Dos Reis, Antonio Alberto Souza Santos, and Denis José Schiozer. 2020. A Design Process Integrating Human-Data Interaction Guidelines and Semio-Participatory Design. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing series. Vol. 378. Springer, Springer, Chapter 1, 334--360.Google Scholar
- Michelle Q Wang Baldonado, Allison Woodruff, and Allan Kuchinsky. 2000 Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. ACM, NY-United States, Palermo, Italy, 110--119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gwendolin Wilke and Edy Portmann. 2016. Granular computing as a basis of human-data interaction: a cognitive cities use case. Granular Computing 1, 3 (2016), 181--197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonja Zillner and Sabrina Neururer. 2015. Technology Roadmap Development for Big Data Healthcare Applications. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 29, 2 (2015), 131--141.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Human-data interaction design guidelines for visualization systems
Recommendations
Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAdvances in artificial intelligence (AI) frame opportunities and challenges for user interface design. Principles for human-AI interaction have been discussed in the human-computer interaction community for over two decades, but more study and ...
Participatory Evaluation of Human-Data Interaction Design Guidelines
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019AbstractThe design of visual analytics tools for facilitating human-data interaction (HDI) plays a key role to help people identifying useful knowledge from large masses of data. Designing data visualization based on guidelines is relevant. However, it is ...
Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization
AVI '00: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfacesA multiple view system uses two or more distinct views to support the investigation of a single conceptual entity. Many such systems exist, ranging from computer-aided design (CAD) systems for chip design that display both the logical structure and the ...
Comments