skip to main content
10.1145/3424953.3426495acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interaction spaces and socioenactive dimensions: exploring perturbations of IoHT

Published:23 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Perception and action on physical or virtual objects are related to the perturbations (light, sound, etc.) caused by them. For the design of collective spaces, with computational technologies embedded in things, it is necessary to understand the environment as a system in the Social, Physical and Digital dimensions. They exchange information and perceive perturbations, acting on feedback. This vision has contributed to the conception of collective spaces in which the dimensions articulate dynamically in a Socioenative way, with a focus on human relations. The practices of Socially Aware Design (SAwD) is a way of thinking and designing Socionative systems, integrating collective actions and perceptions, between people and computing in spaces where things are organized to create an environment. In this article we present the conguration of a Physical space developed in a hospital to provide a Socioenative environment that has contributed to the construction and theoretical-practical evolution in the studies of socioenation. The design of artifacts to compose environments in the hospital helped to understand the dimensions for application in IoHT (Internet of Human Things) systems as Socioenative Systems from the perspective of SAwD, and to map the dimensions in relation to their composition, characteristics, dynamics and interdependencies, allowing the visualization of their connections.

References

  1. Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2009. Socially Aware Computing. ICECE'2009 VI International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education (2009), 30--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2014. Social Awareness in HCI. interactions 21, 4 (July 2014), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2015. Sistemas Sócio-Enativos: Investigando Novas Dimensões no Design da Interação Mediada por Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação. FAPESP Thematic Project (2015/165280).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas and Rodrigo Bonacin. 2008. Design - Indicating Through Signs. Design Issues 24 (06 2008), 30--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas, Maria Cecília Martins, and José Armando Valente. 2013. Codesign de Redes Digitais: Tecnologia e Educação a Serviço da Inclusão Social. Editora Penso, Porto Alegre - RS. Book.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Cecília C. Baranauskas, Juliano Schimiguel, Carlos A. C. Simoni, and Cláudia Bauzer Medeiros. 2005. Guiding the process of requirements elicitation with a semiotic approach. In 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 100--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. José Valderlei da Silva, Vanessa R. M. L. Maike, Lu a M. Muriana, Camilla V. L. T. Brennand, Roberto Pereira, T ania Lima, and Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2019. Explorando Afeto e Socioenação no Cenário de um Hospital. Technical Report IC-19-02. Institute of Computing, University of Campinas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. José Valderlei da Silva, Roberto Pereira, Samuel Bastos Buchdid, Emanuel Felipe Duarte, and Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2016. SAwD - Socially Aware Design: An Organizational Semiotics-Based CASE Tool to Support Early Design Activities. In 17th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations (ICISO), Vol. AICT-477. Springer International Publishing, Campinas, Brazil, 59--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. José Valderlei da Silva, Roberto Pereira, Elaine C. S. Hayashi, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. Design Practices and the SAwD Tool: Towards the Open-design Concept. In Digitalisation, Innovation, and Transformation, Kecheng Liu, Keiichi Nakata, Weizi Li, and Cecilia Baranauskas (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 208--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J.J. Gibson. 2014. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. E.T. Hall, H.E. T, T. Hall, and Kerr White Health Care Collection. 1990. The Silent Language. Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Edward T. Hall. 2005. A dimensão oculta. Martins Fontes, São Paulo - SP. Tradução: Waldéia Barcellos - Título original: The hidden dimension.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Elaine C. S. Hayashi, Heiko Hornung, José Valderlei da Silva, Roberto Pereira, Samuel Buchdid, Bruna Zanetti Panaggio, Tãnia Lima André Delai, and Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. Socio-enactive Systems: The Hospital Scenario. Technical Report IC-18-03. Institute of Computing, University of Campinas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Elaine C. S. Hayashi, Roberto Pereira, José Valderlei da Silva, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. Enactive Systems and Children at Hospitals: For More Socially Aware Solutions with Improved Affectibility. In Digitalisation, Innovation, and Transformation, Kecheng Liu, Keiichi Nakata, Weizi Li, and Cecília Baranauskas (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 197--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IEEE-Internet-Initiative. 2015. Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). https://iot.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/IEEE_IoT_Towards_Definition_Internet_of_Things_Revision1_27MAY15.pdf Retrieved May 13, 2015 from.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mauri Kaipainen, Niklas Ravaja, Pia Tikka, Rasmus Vuori, Roberto Pugliese, Marco Rapino, and Tapio Takala. 2011. Enactive Systems and Enactive Media: Embodied Human-Machine Coupling beyond Interfaces. Leonardo 44, 5 (2011), 433--438. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00244 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Martin Kolkman. 1993. Problem Articulation Methodology. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Twente.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong-Woo Lee. 2016. Study on Actual Cases and Meanings for Internet of Things. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications 10, 1 (jan 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kecheng Liu. 2000. Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kecheng Liu and Li Weizi. 2014. Organisational Semiotics for Business Informatics. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon - UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Newen, L. De Bruin, and S. Gallagher. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberto Pereira and Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas. 2014. Value Pie: A Culturally Informed Conceptual Scheme for Understanding Values in Design. In Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 122--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Roberto Pereira, Samuel B. Buchdid, and Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas. 2012. Keeping Values in Mind --- Artifacts for a Value-oriented and Culturally Informed Design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Volume 3. SciTePress, 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. José Valderlei da Silva, M. Cecília C. Baranauskas, Eliana Alves Moreira, Luã Marcelo Muriana, and Andressa Cristina dos Santos. 2019. Reclaiming Human Space at IoT: Contributions of the Socially Aware Design. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil) (IHC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 42, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. SOBRAPAR. 2019. Instituto de Cirurgia Plástica Crânio Facial. Disponível em http://www.sobrapar.org.br/. - Acesso em 21/05/2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ronald Stamper. 1973. Information in Business and Administrative Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Peter Stilwell and Katherine Harman. 2019. An enactive approach to pain: beyond the biopsychosocial model. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (04 2019), 637--665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265 (1991), 94--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Weiser, R. Gold, and J. S. Brown. 1999. The origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s. IBM Systems Journal 38, 4 (1999), 693--696. a Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Robert K. Yin. 2010. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos (4a ed.). Bookman Editora, Porto Alegre - RS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interaction spaces and socioenactive dimensions: exploring perturbations of IoHT

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHC '20: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        October 2020
        519 pages
        ISBN:9781450381727
        DOI:10.1145/3424953

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 December 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        IHC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate60of155submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader