skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484336acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dark Patterns: Towards a Socio-technical Approach

Published:18 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The term Dark Pattern has been used to define design patterns intentionally created to deceive users or favor the interests of parties other than users. Dark Patterns present socio-technical characteristics as something that happens when humans interact with technical artifacts in a given environment, causing annoyance, frustration, anger, and other emotions in users. Comprehending Dark Patterns require us to look at them from different perspectives, in a multifocal way, considering social and technical aspects in an intertwined way. In this paper, we apply the Semiotic Framework to analyze and discuss Dark Patterns from a socio-technical perspective. We use a popular Dark Pattern called Roach Motel to exemplify our discussion, unraveling it with the Semiotic Framework. Results show the complexity of the topic and exemplify the potential of a socio-technical approach to understand, characterize and advance our knowledge on it.

References

  1. Amazon. 2018. Close your Amazon account. Retrieved May 30, 2021 from https://www.amazon.com/privacy/data-deletionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ian Blair. 2018. Why Users Mute Push Notifications. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://buildfire.com/why- users- mute-push-notifications/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christoph Bösch, Benjamin Erb, Frank Kargl, Henning Kopp, and Stefan Pfattheicher. 2016. Tales from the dark side: Privacy dark strategies and privacy dark patterns. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2016, 4 (2016), 237--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. danah boyd. 2008. Understanding socio-technical phenomena in a web2. 0 Era. MSR New England Lab Opening 22 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Harry Brignull. 2010. Dark Patterns. Retrieved May 24, 2021 from https://www.darkpatterns.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Harry Brignull. 2010. Roach Motel. Retrieved May 26, 2021 from https://www.darkpatterns.org/types-of-dark-pattern/roach-motelGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Chris Watkins, Lucca McKay, and Colin M Gray. 2019. "Nothing Comes Before Profit" Asshole Design In the Wild. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Carlton Collins. 2018. Amazon account management: Hard to quit. Retrieved May 23, 2021 from https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2018/sep/how-to-delete-amazon-account.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory Conti and Edward Sobiesk. 2010. Malicious interface design: exploiting the user. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. 271--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Linda Di Geronimo, Larissa Braz, Enrico Fregnan, Fabio Palomba, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2020. UI dark patterns and where to find them: a study on mobile applications and user perception. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ameya Dusane. 2019. Leanplum Study Reports 75% of Millennials Delete Mobile Apps Due to Irrelevant Too Many Notifications. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://www.martechadvisor.com/news/mobile-marketing/leanplum-study-reports-75-of-millennials-delete-mobile-apps-due-to-irrelevant-too-many-notifications/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hussain Fakhruddin. 2016. Top 12 Reasons Why Users Frequently Uninstall Mobile Apps. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/top-12-reasons-why-users-frequently-uninstall-mobile-apps-fakhruddinGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto and Frederick MC van Amstel. 2017. Designing oppressive and libertarian interactions with the conscious body. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Colin M Gray, Jingle Chen, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, and Liyang Qu. 2020. End User Accounts of Dark Patterns as Felt Manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11046 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Colin M Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L Toombs. 2018. The dark (patterns) side of UX design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Saul Greenberg, Sebastian Boring, Jo Vermeulen, and Jakub Dostal. 2014. Dark patterns in proxemic interactions: a critical perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 523--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Anjali Jain. 2019. 10 reasons why users uninstall your mobile app. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://clevertap.com/blog/10-reasons-why-users-uninstall-your-mobile-app/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cherie Lacey and Catherine Caudwell. 2019. Cuteness as a 'Dark Pattern'in home robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 374--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leanplum. 2019. Inside the Best Mobile Communications Brands Top Reason Brands Fail Is Annoying Communications. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/14EIlHptY1-q1IUvTaqbzwMFPR9OQML4o/view?usp=sharingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Carla Leitão, Cristiano Maciel, Lara Schibelsky Godoy Piccolo, Luciana Salgado, Patricia C de Souza, Raquel Prates, Roberto Pereira, and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2017. Human Values in HCI: a challenge for the GrandIHC-BR. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Maximilian Maier and Rikard Harr. 2020. DARK DESIGN PATTERNS: AN END-USER PERSPECTIVE. Human Technology 16, 2 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Arunesh Mathur, Gunes Acar, Michael J Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Dark patterns at scale: Findings from a crawl of 11K shopping websites. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Arunesh Mathur, Mihir Kshirsagar, and Jonathan Mayer. 2021. What makes a dark pattern... dark? design attributes, normative considerations, and measurement methods. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Robert Rosenberger. 2020. On hostile design: Theoretical and empirical prospects. Urban Studies 57, 4 (2020), 883--893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Nick Routley. 2018. The Multi-Billion Dollar Industry That Makes Its Living From Your Data. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/personal-data-ecosystem/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Selena Savic and Gordan Savicic. 2014. Unpleasant design. Designing out unwanted behaviour. In Proceedings of the 5th STS Italia Conference: A Matter of Design. Making Society through Science and Technology. 975--988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ronald Stamper. 1993. A semiotic theory of information and information systems. In Invited papers for the ICL/University of Newcastle Seminar on Information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. science 211, 4481 (1981), 453--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Upland. 2018. The Inside View: How Consumers Really Feel About Push Notifications. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://uplandsoftware.com/localytics/resources/blog/the-inside-view-how-consumers-really-feel-about-push-notifications/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Christine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub, and Thorsten Holz. 2019. (un) informed consent: Studying gdpr consent notices in the field. In Proceedings of the 2019 acm sigsac conference on computer and communications security. 973--990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. José P Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark patterns in the design of games. In Foundations of Digital Games 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dark Patterns: Towards a Socio-technical Approach

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          October 2021
          523 pages
          ISBN:9781450386173
          DOI:10.1145/3472301

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 October 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate29of77submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader