Guilherme E. Konopatzki Filho
ABSTRACT
A significant increase in multi-touch interactions is notable with the expanded use of smartphones, tablets, and tabletops. Multi-touch systems are software that uses the user's fingers to perform some action. These systems need evaluation before being available in the market to improve the interaction and general user experience. In this context, User eXperience (UX) and Usability are relevant criteria related to multi-touch systems quality. Therefore, we performed a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) seeking to identify evaluation technologies used by professionals and researchers to evaluate the aspects of Usability and UX in multi-touch systems. After the selection process, 65 out of 622 identified papers were selected for data extraction. As a result, 29 different evaluation technologies were identified. Besides, we also obtained characteristics of these technologies, empirical studies, and the multi-touch systems presented in the papers. Our study shows a lack of evaluation technologies focused on the multi-touch context; most do not evaluate Usability and UX concepts jointly; none go under an empirical evaluation since researchers tend to create their technologies to assess their aspects. This SMS presents data about the evaluation technologies extracted and the gaps found over the researched topic, contributing to the scientific and industrial community that evaluates the Usability and UX of multi-touch systems.
- Christopher James Ackad, Anthony Collins, and Judy Kay. 2010. Switch: exploring the design of application and configuration switching at tabletops. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 95--104.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Douglas G Altman. 1990. Practical statistics for medical research. CRC press.Google Scholar
- A. Ampatzoglou, S. Bibi, P. Avgeriou, M. Verbeek, and A. Chatzigeorgiou. 2019. Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies. Information and Software Technology 106 (2019), 201 -- 230.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adrien Arnaud, Jean-Baptiste Corrégé, Céline Clavel, Michèle Gouiffès, and Mehdi Ammi. 2016. Exploration of virtual environments on tablet: comparison between tactile and tangible interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 357--361.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Victor R Basili and H Dieter Rombach. 1988. Towards a comprehensive framework for reuse: A reuse-enabling software evolution environment. In NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Software Engineering Workshop.Google Scholar
- Mehmet Ilker Berkman and Adem Karahoca. 2012. A direct touch table-top display as a multi-user information kiosk: Comparing the usability of a single display groupware either by a single user or people cooperating as a group. Interacting with Computers 24, 5 (2012), 423--437.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Bertolo, Robin Vivian, and Jérome Dinet. 2013. A set of interactions to rotate solids in 3D geometry context. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 625--630.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bojan Blažica, Daniel Vladušič, and Dunja Mladenić. 2013. MTi: A method for user identification for multitouch displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 6 (2013), 691--702.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Brooke. 1996. SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry, P. W. JORDAN and et al. (Eds.). Taylor&Francis, London, 1--7.Google Scholar
- Bill Buxton et al. 2007. Multi-touch systems that I have known and loved. Microsoft Research 56 (2007), 1--11.Google Scholar
- Thiago Campos, Eduardo Damasceno, and Natasha M. C. Valentim. [n.d.]. Proposal and Evaluation of a Collaborative IS to Support Systematic Reviews and Mapping Studies. In Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems (SBSI).Google Scholar
- Antonia Cascales-Martínez, María-José Martínez-Segura, David Pérez-López, and Manuel Contero. 2016. Using an augmented reality enhanced tabletop system to promote learning of mathematics: A case study with students with special educational needs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13, 2 (2016), 355--380.Google Scholar
- Zhiyong Chen, Juncong Lin, Guangyu Zhang, Wei Yang, Guilin Li, and Guohua Huang. 2016. A multi-touch interface for natural and seamless image composition. In 2016 11th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE). IEEE, 796--801.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gianluigi Ciocca, Paolo Olivo, and Raimondo Schettini. 2012. Browsing museum image collections on a multi-touch table. Information systems 37, 2 (2012), 169--182.Google Scholar
- Ashley Colley, Jani Väyrynen, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2015. In-car touch screen interaction: Comparing standard, finger-specific and multi-finger interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on pervasive displays. 131--137.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jamie L Coram, Rob Iverson, and Andrew Ackerman. 2013. AstroTouch: a multi-touch digital desktop for astrodynamics. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces. 11--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sashikanth Damaraju, Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo, Tracy Hammond, and Andruid Kerne. 2013. Multi-tap sliders: advancing touch interaction for parameter adjustment. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. 445--452.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tulio de Souza Alcantara, Pierre Bastianelli, Jennifer Ferreira, and Frank Maurer. 2012. A multi-touch approach to control MRI scans: A user-centered study report. In 2012 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering in Health Care (SEHC). IEEE, 65--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Derboven, Dries De Roeck, and Mathijs Verstraete. 2012. Semiotic analysis of multi-touch interface design: The MuTable case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 10 (2012), 714--728.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Connor Dodd, Rukshan Athauda, and Marc Adam. 2017. Designing user interfaces for the elderly: a systematic literature review. (2017).Google Scholar
- Julie Ducasse, Marc Macé, Bernard Oriola, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2018. Botmap: Non-visual panning and zooming with an actuated tabletop tangible interface. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 4 (2018), 1--42.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Echtler, Simon Nestler, Andreas Dippon, and Gudrun Klinker. 2009. Supporting casual interactions between board games on public tabletop displays and mobile devices. Personal and ubiquitous computing 13, 8 (2009), 609--617.Google Scholar
- Hadziq Fabroyir. 2019. Multitouch Interface is not Good for Spatial Navigation in Virtual Reality. In 2019 12th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS). IEEE, 323--326.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saad Q Fleh, Oğuz Bayat, Saad Al-Azawi, and Osman Nuri Uçan. 2018. A systematic mapping study on touch classification. (2018).Google Scholar
- Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Chia Shen, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 647--656.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Georg Freitag, Michael Tränkner, and Markus Wacker. 2012. Enhanced feed-forward for a user aware multi-touch device. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. 578--586.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathias Frisch, Ricardo Langner, and Raimund Dachselt. 2011. Neat: a set of flexible tools and gestures for layout tasks on interactive displays. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 1--10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chi-Wing Fu, Wooi-Boon Goh, and Junxiang Allen Ng. 2010. Multi-touch techniques for exploring large-scale 3D astrophysical simulations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2213--2222.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emilien Ghomi, Stéphane Huot, Olivier Bau, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy E Mackay. 2013. Arpège: learning multitouch chord gestures vocabularies. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces. 209--218.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Giesler, Dimitar Valkov, and Klaus Hinrichs. 2014. Void shadows: multi-touch interaction with stereoscopic objects on the tabletop. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Spatial user interaction. 104--112.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guilherme Corredato Guerino and Natasha Malveira Costa Valentim. 2020. Usability and user experience evaluation of natural user interfaces: a systematic mapping study. IET Software 14, 5 (2020), 451--467.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hejar Gürlük, Malte-Levin Jauer, and Maria Uebbing-Rumke. 2014. Design and evaluation of a multi-touch interaction language for approach controllers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. 1--4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Hachet, Benoit Bossavit, Aurélie Cohé, and Jean-Baptiste de la Rivière. 2011. Toucheo: multitouch and stereo combined in a seamless workspace. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 587--592.Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl and Noam Tractinsky. 2006. User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & information technology 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.Google Scholar
- Hsien-Sheng Hsiao, Cheng-Sian Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Chih-Chun Chang, and Jyun-Chen Chen. 2014. The influence of collaborative learning games within different devices on student's learning performance and behaviours. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 30, 6 (2014).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Osvaldo Huerta, J Alfredo Sánchez, Salvador Fuentes, and Ofelia Cervantes. 2011. Speak up your mind: Using speech to capture innovative ideas on interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 202--211.Google Scholar
- ISO 9241-210. 2019. Ergonomics of Human System Interaction - Part 210: Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
- ISO/IEC 25010. 2011. Systems and Software Engineering - SquaRE - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation: System and Software Quality Models). International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
- Giulio Jacucci, Ann Morrison, Gabriela T Richard, Jari Kleimola, Peter Peltonen, Lorenza Parisi, and Toni Laitinen. 2010. Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2267--2276.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hans-Christian Jetter, Jens Gerken, Michael Zöllner, Harald Reiterer, and Natasa Milic-Frayling. 2011. Materializing the query with facet-streams: a hybrid surface for collaborative search on tabletops. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3013--3022.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johan Kildal, Andrés Lucero, and Marion Boberg. 2013. Twisting touch: combining deformation and touch as input within the same interaction cycle on handheld devices. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 237--246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seon Joo Kim, Hongwei Ng, Stefan Winkler, Peng Song, and Chi-Wing Fu. 2012. Brush-and-drag: A multi-touch interface for photo triaging. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 59--68.Google Scholar
- Yoon-Hyun Kim and Ji-Hyun Lee. 2015. Game interface enhancement under smartphone platform focused on touchscreen interaction. Computers & Industrial Engineering 80 (2015), 45--61.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. (2007).Google Scholar
- Panagiotis Koutlemanis, Antonios Ntelidakis, Xenophon Zabulis, Dimitris Grammenos, and Ilia Adami. 2013. A steerable multitouch display for surface computing and its evaluation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 22, 06 (2013), 1360016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Kulik, André Kunert, Magdalena Keil, and Bernd Froehlich. 2018. RST 3D: A comprehensive gesture set for multitouch 3D navigation. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 363--370.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Felipe Eduardo Lammel, Isabel Harb Manssour, and Milene Selbach Silveira. 2016. Multi-touch Interaction with Information Visualization Techniques: An Analysis Using Twitter Data. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 211--222.Google Scholar
- Ioannis Leftheriotis. 2013. User authentication in a multi-touch surface: a chord password system. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1725--1730.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ioannis Leftheriotis, Michail N Giannakos, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, and Letizia Jaccheri. 2015. Investigating the Potential of a Two-finger Chord Button in Multi-touch Applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces. 337--342.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shuang Liang, Justin Cameron, and George Baciu. 2011. Generic gesture kernel modeling and its application with virtual garment design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry. 279--286.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roman Lissermann, Jochen Huber, Martin Schmitz, Jürgen Steimle, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2014. Permulin: mixed-focus collaboration on multi-view tabletops. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3191--3200.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tahir Mustafa Madni, Yunus B Nayan, Suziah Sulaiman, Ahsanullah Abro, and Muhammad Tahir. 2016. Usability evaluation of orientation techniques for medical image analysis using tabletop system. In 2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS). IEEE, 477--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sômulo Nogueira Mafra, Rafael Ferreira Barcelos, and Guilherme Horta Travassos. 2006. Aplicando uma metodologia baseada em evidência na definição de novas tecnologias de software. In Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES 2006), Vol. 1. 239--254.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juan-Fernando Martin-SanJose, M-Carmen Juan, Ramón Mollá, and Roberto Vivó. 2017. Advanced displays and natural user interfaces to support learning. Interactive Learning Environments 25, 1 (2017), 17--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walid Merrad, Alexis Héloir, Christophe Kolski, and Antonio Krüger. 2022. RFID-based tangible and touch tabletop for dual reality in crisis management context. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 16, 1 (2022), 31--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Micire, Munjal Desai, Jill L Drury, Eric McCann, Adam Norton, Katherine M Tsui, and Holly A Yanco. 2011. Design and validation of two-handed multi-touch tabletop controllers for robot teleoperation. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. 145--154.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Annette Mossel, Benjamin Venditti, and Hannes Kaufmann. 2013. 3DTouch and HOMER-S: intuitive manipulation techniques for one-handed handheld augmented reality. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual. 1--10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Muender, Sadaab Ali Gulani, Lauren Westendorf, Clarissa Verish, Rainer Malaka, Orit Shaer, and Seth Cooper. 2019. Comparison of mouse and multi-touch for protein structure manipulation in a citizen science game interface. Journal of Science Communication 18, 1 (2019), A05.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vicente Nacher and Javier Jaen. 2015. Evaluating the accuracy of pre-kindergarten children multi-touch interaction. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 549--556.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vicente Nacher, Javier Jaen, Elena Navarro, Alejandro Catala, and Pascual González. 2015. Multi-touch gestures for pre-kindergarten children. International journal of human-computer studies 73 (2015), 37--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fatih Nayebi, Jean-Marc Desharnais, and Alain Abran. 2012. The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation. In 2012 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex Olwal, Steven Feiner, and Susanna Heyman. 2008. Rubbing and tapping for precise and rapid selection on touch-screen displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 295--304.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max Pfeiffer, Dagmar Kern, Johannes Schöning, Tanja Döring, Antonio Krüger, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. A multi-touch enabled steering wheel: exploring the design space. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3355--3360.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Srinivasan Radhakrishnan, Yingzi Lin, Ibrahim Zeid, and Sagar Kamarthi. 2013. Finger-based multitouch interface for performing 3D CAD operations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 3 (2013), 261--275.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roman Rädle, Hans-Christian Jetter, Simon Butscher, and Harald Reiterer. 2013. The effect of egocentric body movements on users' navigation performance and spatial memory in zoomable user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces. 23--32.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adriano Bernardo Renzi and Sydney Freitas. 2014. Affordances and gestural interaction on multi-touch interface systems: building new mental models. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. Springer, 615--623.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ivan Rodriguez-Conde and Celso Campos. 2020. Towards customer-centric additive manufacturing: making human-centered 3D design tools through a handheld-based multi-touch user interface. Sensors 20, 15 (2020), 4255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M Ryan, C Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344--360.Google Scholar
- Gleison Santos, Ana Regina Rocha, Tayana Conte, Monalessa Perini Barcellos, and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2012. Strategic alignment between academy and Industry: a Virtuous Cycle to Promote Innovation in Technology. In 2012 26th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. IEEE, 196--200.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tim Schürmann, Christina Binder, Gesche Janzarik, and Joachim Vogt. 2015. Movement transformation on multi-touch devices: Intuition or instructional preparation? Applied Ergonomics 50 (2015), 251--255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ben Shneiderman. 1981. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Easier and More Productive Use of Computer Systems.(Part-II): Human Interface and the User Interface-Volume 1981. 143.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Forrest Shull, Jeffrey Carver, and Guilherme H Travassos. 2001. An empirical methodology for introducing software processes. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 26, 5 (2001), 288--296.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Can Telkenaroglu and Tolga Capin. 2013. Dual-finger 3d interaction techniques for mobile devices. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 7 (2013), 1551--1572.Google Scholar
- Po-Huan Tseng, Shih-Hsuan Hung, Pei-Ying Chiang, Chih-Yuan Yao, and Hung-Kuo Chu. 2018. EZ-Manipulator: Designing a mobile, fast, and ambiguity-free 3D manipulation interface using smartphones. Computational Visual Media 4, 2 (2018), 139--147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philip Tuddenham, David Kirk, and Shahram Izadi. 2010. Graspables revisited: multi-touch vs. tangible input for tabletop displays in acquisition and manipulation tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2223--2232.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elena Tuveri, Samuel A Iacolina, Fabio Sorrentino, L Davide Spano, and Riccardo Scateni. 2013. Controlling a planetarium software with a Kinect or in a multi-touch table: a comparison. In Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI. 1--4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Uebbing-Rumke, Hejar Gürlük, Malte-Levin Jauer, Konrad Hagemann, and Andreas Udovic. 2014. Usability evaluation of multi-touch displays for TMA controller working positions. Proceedings of the 4th SESAR Innovation Days, Madrid, Spain (2014), 25--27.Google Scholar
- Peter Vorderer, Werner Wirth, Feliz Ribeiro Gouveia, Frank Biocca, Timo Saari, Lutz Jäncke, Saskia Böcking, Holger Schramm, Andre Gysbers, Tilo Hartmann, et al. 2004. Mec spatial presence questionnaire. Retrieved Sept 18 (2004), 2015.Google Scholar
- Julie Wagner, Stéphane Huot, and Wendy Mackay. 2012. BiTouch and BiPad: designing bimanual interaction for hand-held tablets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2317--2326.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jia Wang and Rob Lindeman. 2012. Leaning-based travel interfaces revisited: frontal versus sidewise stances for flying in 3D virtual spaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. 121--128.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jia Wang and Robert Lindeman. 2014. Coordinated 3D interaction in tablet-and HMD-based hybrid virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Spatial user interaction. 70--79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jia Wang and Robert Lindeman. 2015. Coordinated hybrid virtual environments: Seamless interaction contexts for effective virtual reality. Computers & Graphics 48 (2015), 71--83.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diane Watson, Mark Hancock, Regan L Mandryk, and Max Birk. 2013. Deconstructing the touch experience. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces. 199--208.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin Wingert, Isabel Schöllhorn, and Matthias Bues. 2017. Prodesk: An interactive ubiquitous desktop surface. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. 366--371.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Panagiotis Zaharias, Despina Michael, and Yiorgos Chrysanthou. 2013. Learning through multi-touch interfaces in museum exhibits: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 16, 3 (2013), 374--384.Google Scholar
- Chi Zhang, Deepak Ranjan Sahoo, Jennifer Pearson, Simon Robinson, Mark D Holton, Philip Hopkins, and Matt Jones. 2020. Active PinScreen: Exploring Spatio-Temporal Tactile Feedbackfor Multi-Finger Interaction. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1--11.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A systematic mapping study on usability and user eXperience evaluation of multi-touch systems
Recommendations
Usability and User eXperience Evaluation of Conversational Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study
SBES '20: Proceedings of the XXXIV Brazilian Symposium on Software EngineeringConversational Systems (CSs) are software that uses the user's voice to perform some action. Before these systems were available to users, they must be evaluated. In this sense, Usability and User eXperience (UX) evaluations contribute to the ...
Proposal and Preliminary Evaluation of a Usability and UX Multi-Touch Evaluation Technology
SBSI '23: Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Information SystemsContext: For multi-touch Information Systems (ISs) to reach the desired level of quality, it is necessary to have an evaluation of it. Two important quality aspects are usability and User eXperience (UX). A good assessment must take into account the ...
A feasibility study of usability and UX evaluation technologies in multi-touch context: A quantitative and qualitative analysis
SBES '23: Proceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software EngineeringThe use of multi-touch systems has been increasing in the last few years. These systems also need to pass through an evaluation to check their quality level. For this, usability and User Experience (UX) are two important aspects. Seeking to find out ...
Comments