Bianca Melo
Ticianne Darin
ABSTRACT
User Experience (UX) is affected by users' emotions and motivations, among other subjective factors. Hence, changes in UX occur over time, according to the different contexts, and behavioral and internal user aspects. With the rising development of Internet of Things (IoT) systems to support daily activities and, at the same time, the increasing abandonment of these systems, the importance of ensuring good UX levels over time has become an even greater need. In this context, we conducted a snowballing procedure and systematic literature mapping to understand whether and how long-term UX evaluations have been conducted in IoT and the challenges and opportunities in conducting longitudinal studies in this field. We analyzed 55 papers that reported longitudinal evaluations in different IoT systems and 14 papers that reported UX evaluations in the IoT context. We also interviewed five software engineering professionals to learn about their IoT user-testing and evaluation perspectives. Our results provide a panorama of the conduction of longitudinal IoT studies and a glance at the directions the research on UX evaluation for IoT systems is taking. Hence, we indicate future research opportunities for evaluating long-term UX in IoT systems through the longitudinal approach, considering the complexity of these systems and their impact on users' everyday lives.
- Muhammad Raisul Alam, Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz, and Mohd Alauddin Mohd Ali. 2012. A review of smart homes---Past, present, and future. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part C (applications and reviews) 42, 6 (2012), 1190--1203.Google Scholar
- Ane Alberdi, Alyssa Weakley, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe, Diane J Cook, Asier Aztiria, Adrian Basarab, and Maitane Barrenechea. 2018. Smart home-based prediction of multidomain symptoms related to Alzheimer's disease. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 22, 6 (2018), 1720--1731.Google Scholar
- Rodrigo LA Almeida, Ticianne GR Darin, Rossana MC Andrade, and Italo L de Araújo. 2018. Towards developing a practical tool to assist UX evaluation in the IoT scenario. In Anais Estendidos do XXIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web. SBC, 91--95.Google Scholar
- Rodrigo Lucas Amora Almeida. 2018. CHASE: checklist para avaliação da experiência do usuário em ambientes de internet das coisas. (2018).Google Scholar
- Mohsen Amiribesheli and Hamid Bouchachia. 2018. A tailored smart home for dementia care. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 9, 6 (2018), 1755--1782.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rossana Andrade, Rainara M Carvalho, Italo Linhares de Araújo, Káthia M Oliveira, and Marcio EF Maia. 2017. What changes from ubiquitous computing to internet of things in interaction evaluation?. In International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions. Springer, 3--21.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ane Alberdi Aramendi, Alyssa Weakley, Asier Aztiria Goenaga, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe, and Diane J Cook. 2018. Automatic assessment of functional health decline in older adults based on smart home data. Journal of biomedical informatics 81 (2018), 119--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parvaneh Asghari, Amir Masoud Rahmani, and Hamid Haj Seyyed Javadi. 2019. Internet of Things applications: A systematic review. Computer Networks 148 (2019), 241--261.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luigi Atzori, Antonio Iera, and Giacomo Morabito. 2010. The internet of things: A survey. Computer networks 54, 15 (2010), 2787--2805.Google Scholar
- Iman Azimi, Olugbenga Oti, Sina Labbaf, Hannakaisa Niela-Vilen, Anna Axelin, Nikil Dutt, Pasi Liljeberg, and Amir M Rahmani. 2019. Personalized maternal sleep quality assessment: An objective iot-based longitudinal study. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 93433--93447.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iman Azimi, Tapio Pahikkala, Amir M Rahmani, Hannakaisa Niela-Vilén, Anna Axelin, and Pasi Liljeberg. 2019. Missing data resilient decision-making for healthcare IoT through personalization: A case study on maternal health. Future Generation Computer Systems 96 (2019), 297--308.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Javier A Bargas-Avila and Kasper Hornbæk. 2011. Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2689--2698.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diana S Bental, Eliza Papadopoulou, Nicholas K Taylor, M Howard Williams, Fraser R Blackmun, Idris S Ibrahim, Mei Yii Lim, Ioannis Mimtsoudis, Stuart W Whyte, and Edel Jennings. 2015. Smartening up the student learning experience with ubiquitous media. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 12, 1s (2015), 1--23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daiana Biduski, Ericles Andrei Bellei, João Pedro Mazuco Rodriguez, Luciana Aparecida Martinez Zaina, and Ana Carolina Bertoletti De Marchi. 2020. Assessing long-term user experience on a mobile health application through an in-app embedded conversation-based questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior 104 (2020), 106169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Igor Bisio, Chiara Garibotto, Aldo Grattarola, Fabio Lavagetto, and Andrea Sciarrone. 2018. Exploiting context-aware capabilities over the internet of things for industry 4.0 applications. Ieee network 32, 3 (2018), 101--107.Google Scholar
- Jan Bobeth, Johann Schrammel, Stephanie Deutsch, Michael Klein, Mario Drobics, Christina Hochleitner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Tablet, gestures, remote control? Influence of age on performance and user experience with iTV applications. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video. 139--146.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Bock, George Demiris, Yong Choi, Thai Le, Hilaire J Thompson, Arjmand Samuel, and Danny Huang. 2016. Engaging older adults in the visualization of sensor data facilitated by an open platform for connected devices. Technology and Health Care 24, 4 (2016), 541--550.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mehmet Cem Bölen. 2020. Exploring the determinants of users' continuance intention in smartwatches. Technology in Society 60 (2020), 101209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niall Bolger and Jean-Philippe Laurenceau. 2013. Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford press.Google Scholar
- Hao Cai, Hans Jørgen Krebs, Yingshan Tao, John Hansen, Ruihuan Pan, Yanguang Cai, Egon Toft, and Birthe Dinesen. 2016. A Qualitative Study on Implementation of the Intelligent Bed: Findings from a Rehabilitation Ward at a Large Chinese Tertiary Hospital. Wireless Personal Communications 90, 1 (2016), 399--420.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vicente López Camacho, Elena de la Guía, Teresa Olivares, M Julia Flores, and Luis Orozco-Barbosa. 2020. Data Capture and Multimodal Learning Analytics Focused on Engagement With a New Wearable IoT Approach. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 13, 4 (2020), 704--717.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marian Carcary, Giovanni Maccani, Eileen Doherty, and Gerard Conway. 2018. Exploring the determinants of IoT adoption: Findings from a systematic literature review. In International Conference on Business Informatics Research. Springer, 113--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diego Casado-Mansilla, Pablo Garaizar, and Diego López-de Ipiña. 2019. User Involvement Matters: The Side-Effects of Automated Smart Objects in Pro-environmental Behaviour. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Internet of Things. 1--4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samir Chatterjee, Jongbok Byun, Kaushik Dutta, Rasmus Ulslev Pedersen, Akshay Pottathil, and Harry Xie. 2018. Designing an Internet-of-Things (IoT) and sensor-based in-home monitoring system for assisting diabetes patients: iterative learning from two case studies. European Journal of Information Systems 27, 6 (2018), 670--685.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Chen, Filip Jankovic, Nikki Marinsek, Luca Foschini, Lampros Kourtis, Alessio Signorini, Melissa Pugh, Jie Shen, Roy Yaari, Vera Maljkovic, et al. 2019. Developing measures of cognitive impairment in the real world from consumer-grade multimodal sensor streams. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2145--2155.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minji Cho, Sang-su Lee, and Kun-Pyo Lee. 2019. Once a kind friend is now a thing: Understanding how conversational agents at home are forgotten. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1557--1569.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bianca Coelho, Rossana MC Andrade, and Ticianne Darin. 2022. Not the Same Everywhere: Comparing the Scope and Definition of User Experience between the Brazilian and International Communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 38, 7 (2022), 595--613.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lilian Crum. 2020. Laws of UX: Using Psychology to Design Better Products & Services, by Jon Yablonski Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, 2020, 152 pp. 9781492055310. US 44.99/CAD 59.99.Google Scholar
- Ticianne Darin, Nayana Carneiro, Rossana Andrade, Rute Castro, and Rodrigo Almeida. 2019. Integrating HCI Perspective into a Mobile Software Development Team: Strategies and lessons from the field. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 1--10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ticianne Darin, Bianca Coelho, and Bosco Borges. 2019. Which instrument should I use? Supporting decision-making about the evaluation of User Experience. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 49--67.Google ScholarDigital Library
- George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, Geraldine Dickey, Marjorie Skubic, and Marilyn Rantz. 2008. Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technology and health care 16, 2 (2008), 111--118.Google Scholar
- Christian Ebi, Fabian Schaltegger, Andreas Rüst, and Frank Blumensaat. 2019. Synchronous LoRa mesh network to monitor processes in underground infrastructure. IEEE access 7 (2019), 57663--57677.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anastasios A Economides. 2016. User perceptions of Internet of Things (IoT) systems. In International Conference on E-Business and Telecommunications. Springer, 3--20.Google Scholar
- Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis, James H Hill, K Denise Kerley, Arjun Sinha, Aaron Ganci, and Cynthia L Russell. 2019. The Feasibility of a Using a Smart Button Mobile Health System to Self-Track Medication Adherence and Deliver Tailored Short Message Service Text Message Feedback. JMIR formative research 3, 2 (2019), e13558.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel A Epstein, Monica Caraway, Chuck Johnston, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2016. Beyond abandonment to next steps: understanding and designing for life after personal informatics tool use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1109--1113.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcos Aurelio Fabricio, Frank Herman Behrens, and David Bianchini. 2020. Monitoring of Industrial Electrical Equipment using IoT. IEEE Latin America Transactions 18, 08 (2020), 1425--1432.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rino Falcone and Alessandro Sapienza. 2018. On the users' acceptance of IoT systems: A theoretical approach. Information 9, 3 (2018), 53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Louis Faust, Priscilla Jiménez-Pazmino, James K Holland, Omar Lizardo, David Hachen, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2019. What 30 Days Tells Us About 3 Years: Identifying Early Signs of User Abandonment and Non-Adherence. In Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 216--224.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathias Funk, Lin-Lin Chen, Shao-Wen Yang, and Yen-Kuang Chen. 2018. Addressing the need to capture scenarios, intentions and preferences: Interactive intentional programming in the smart home. International Journal of Design 12, 1 (2018), 53--66.Google Scholar
- Radhika Garg. 2019. An analysis of (non-) use practices and decisions of internet of things. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 3--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radhika Garg, Hua Cui, and Yash Kapadia. 2021. "Learn, Use, and (Intermittently) Abandon": Exploring the Practices of Early Smart Speaker Adopters in Urban India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--28.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radhika Garg and Jenna Kim. 2018. An exploratory study for understanding reasons of (Not-) using internet of things. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radhika Garg and Subhasree Sengupta. 2020. He Is Just Like Me: A Study of the Long-Term Use of Smart Speakers by Parents and Children. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 1 (2020), 1--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christine Geeng and Franziska Roesner. 2019. Who's In Control? Interactions In Multi-User Smart Homes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jens Gerken. 2011. Longitudinal research in human-computer interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
- Amit K Gupta, Isaac Skog, and Peter Händel. 2015. Long-term performance evaluation of a foot-mounted pedestrian navigation device. In 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peeyush Gupta, Michael J Carey, Sharad Mehrotra, and oberto Yus. 2020. Smartbench: A benchmark for data management in smart spaces. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 13, 12 (2020), 1807--1820.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefanie Harbich and Marc Hassenzahl. 2017. User experience in the work domain: A longitudinal field study. Interacting with Computers 29, 3 (2017), 306--324.Google Scholar
- Md Kamrul Hasan, Golam Mushih Tanimul Ahsan, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Rechard Love, and Reza Salim. 2016. Pain level detection from facial image captured by smartphone. Journal of Information Processing 24, 4 (2016), 598--608.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Hassenzahl and Noam Tractinsky. 2006. User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & information technology 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.Google Scholar
- Michael Holmes, Miquel Perello Nieto, Hao Song, Emma Tonkin, Sabrina Grant, and Peter Flach. 2020. Modelling Patient Behaviour Using IoT Sensor Data: a Case Study to Evaluate Techniques for Modelling Domestic Behaviour in Recovery from Total Hip Replacement Surgery. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 4, 3 (2020), 238--260.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wei Hong, Baohua Xu, Xuepeng Chi, Xuepei Cui, Yinfa Yan, and Tongyang Li. 2020. Long-Term and Extensive Monitoring for Bee Colonies Based on Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 8 (2020), 7148--7155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kasper Hornbæk and Morten Hertzum. 2017. Technology acceptance and user experience: A review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 24, 5 (2017), 1--30.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rui Hu, Bruno Michel, Dario Russo, Niccolò Mora, Guido Matrella, Paolo Ciampolini, Francesca Cocchi, Enrico Montanari, Stefano Nunziata, and Thomas Brunschwiler. 2021. An Unsupervised Behavioral Modeling and Alerting System Based on Passive Sensing for Elderly Care. Future Internet 13, 1 (2021), 6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yu Huang, Yi-Chao Chen, Chuang-Wen You, Dian-Xuan Wu, Yi-Ling Chen, Kai-Lung Hua, and Jane Yung-Jen Hsu. 2017. Toward an easy deployable outdoor parking system---Lessons from long-term deployment. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 227--236.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ane Irizar-Arrieta, Diego Casado-Mansilla, Pablo Garaizar, Diego López-de Ipiña, and Aiur Retegi. 2020. User perspectives in the design of interactive everyday objects for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 137 (2020), 102393.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Timo Jakobi, Corinna Ogonowski, Nico Castelli, Gunnar Stevens, and Volker Wulf. 2017. The catch (es) with smart home: Experiences of a living lab field study. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1620--1633.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Timo Jakobi, Gunnar Stevens, Nico Castelli, Corinna Ogonowski, Florian Schaub, Nils Vindice, Dave Randall, Peter Tolmie, and Volker Wulf. 2018. Evolving needs in iot control and accountability: A longitudinal study on smart home intelligibility. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 4 (2018), 1--28.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rebecca Jamwal, Libby Callaway, Jane Ackerl, Louise Farnworth, and Di Winkler. 2017. Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: Implications for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 80, 2 (2017), 89--98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2018. Assisted shifting of electricity use: a long-term study of managing residential heating. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 5 (2018), 1--33.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jie Jiang, Riccardo Pozza, Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir, Nigel Gilbert, and Klaus Moessner. 2017. Recognising activities at home: Digital and human sensors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems. 1--11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evangelos Karapanos, Jens Gerken, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2021. Advances in Longitudinal HCI Research. Springer.Google Scholar
- Evangelos Karapanos, Jean-Bernard Martens, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2010. On the retrospective assessment of users' experiences over time: memory or actuality? In CHI'10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 4075--4080.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evangelos Karapanos, Jean-Bernard Martens, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2012. Reconstructing experiences with iScale. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 11 (2012), 849--865.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pariya Kashfi, Robert Feldt, Agneta Nilsson, and R Berntsson Svensson. 2014. Models for integrating UX into software engineering practice: an industrial validation. Software Engineering (2014).Google Scholar
- Ivo Käthner, Sebastian Halder, Christoph Hintermüller, Arnau Espinosa, Christoph Guger, Felip Miralles, Eloisa Vargiu, Stefan Dauwalder, Xavier Rafael-Palou, Marc Solà, et al. 2017. A multifunctional brain-computer interface intended for home use: an evaluation with healthy participants and potential end users with dry and gel-based electrodes. Frontiers in Neuroscience 11 (2017), 286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pallavi Kaushik, SS Intille, and K Larson. 2008. User-adaptive reminders for home-based medical tasks. Methods of Information in Medicine 47, 03 (2008), 203--207.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara A Kitchenham, David Budgen, and O Pearl Brereton. 2010. The value of mapping studies-A participant-observer case study. In 14th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (ease). 1--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Kjærup, Mikael B Skov, Peter Axel Nielsen, Jesper Kjeldskov, Jens Gerken, and Harald Reiterer. 2021. Longitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI Publications From 1982--2019. Advances in Longitudinal HCI Research (2021), 11--39.Google Scholar
- Sari Kujala, Talya Miron-Shatz, and Jussi J Jokinen. 2019. The Cross-Sequential Approach: A Short-Term Method for Studying Long-Term User Experience. Journal of Usability Studies 14, 2 (2019).Google Scholar
- Sari Kujala, Virpi Roto, Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, Evangelos Karapanos, and Arto Sinnelä. 2011. UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interacting with computers 23, 5 (2011), 473--483.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sari Kujala, Virpi Roto, Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, and Arto Sinnelä. 2011. Identifying hedonic factors in long-term user experience. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. 1--8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sari Kujala, Marlene Vogel, Anna E Pohlmeyer, and Marianna Obrist. 2013. Lost in time: the meaning of temporal aspects in user experience. In CHI'13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 559--564.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amanda Lazar, Christian Koehler, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, and David H Nguyen. 2015. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 635--646.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Bogyeong Lee, Changbum Ryan Ahn, Prakhar Mohan, Theodora Chaspari, and Hyun-Soo Lee. 2020. Evaluating Routine Variability of Daily Activities in Smart Homes with Image Complexity Measures. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 34, 6 (2020), 04020042.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seungyeon Lee, Hyejin Ryu, Byungho Park, and Myung Hwan Yun. 2020. Using Physiological Recordings for Studying User Experience: Case of Conversational Agent-Equipped TV. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 36, 9 (2020), 815--827.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerhard Leitner, Anton Josef Fercher, Alexander Felfernig, and Martin Hitz. 2012. Reducing the entry threshold of AAL systems: preliminary results from casa vecchia. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 709--715.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edmond Lou, Gabrielle C Lam, Douglas L Hill, and Man-Sang Wong. 2012. Development of a smart garment to reduce kyphosis during dailyl iving. Medical & biological engineering & computing 50, 11 (2012), 1147--1154.Google Scholar
- Aigul Mavletova. 2015. A gamification effect in longitudinal web surveys among children and adolescents. International Journal of Market Research 57, 3 (2015), 413--438.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jochen Meyer, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. No effects but useful? Long term use of smart health devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. 516--521.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mateusz Mikusz, Peter Shaw, Nigel Davies, Petteri Nurmi, Sarah Clinch, Ludwig Trotter, Ivan Elhart, Marc Langheinrich, and Adrian Friday. 2021. A longitudinal study of pervasive display personalisation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 28, 1 (2021), 1--45.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Angélique Montuwy, Béatrice Cahour, and Aurélie Dommes. 2019. Using Sensory wearable devices to navigate the city: effectiveness and user experience in older pedestrians. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 1 (2019), 17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohsin Munir, Steffen Erkel, Andreas Dengel, and Sheraz Ahmed. 2017. Pattern-based contextual anomaly detection in HVAC systems. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, 1066--1073.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walter Takashi Nakamura, Iftekhar Ahmed, David Redmiles, Edson Oliveira, David Fernandes, Elaine HT de Oliveira, and Tayana Conte. 2021. Are UX Evaluation Methods Providing the Same Big Picture? Sensors 21, 10 (2021), 3480.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert C Nickerson, Upkar Varshney, and Jan Muntermann. 2013. A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 22, 3 (2013), 336--359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stavroula Ntoa, George Margetis, Margherita Antona, and Constantine Stephanidis. 2021. User Experience Evaluation in Intelligent Environments: A Comprehensive Framework. Technologies 9, 2 (2021), 41.Google Scholar
- Alexandra Oliveira, Eliana Silva, Joyce Aguiar, Brígida Mónica Faria, Luís Paulo Reis, Henrique Cardoso, Joaquim Gonçalves, Jorge Oliveira e Sá, Victor Carvalho, and Herlander Marques. 2020. Biometrics and quality of life of lymphoma patients: A longitudinal mixed-model approach. Expert Systems (2020), e12640.Google Scholar
- Luis Oliveira, Val Mitchell, and Andrew May. 2019. Smart home technology---comparing householder expectations at the point of installation with experiences 1 year later. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2019), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Federica Paganelli, Georgios Mylonas, Giovanni Cuffaro, and Ilaria Nesi. 2019. Experiences from using gamification and IoT-based educational tools in high schools towards energy savings. In European Conference on Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 75--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charith Perera, Arkady Zaslavsky, Peter Christen, and Dimitrios Georgakopoulos. 2013. Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials 16, 1 (2013), 414--454.Google Scholar
- Francesco Piccialli, Yuji Yoshimura, Paolo Benedusi, Carlo Ratti, and Salvatore Cuomo. 2019. Lessons learned from longitudinal modeling of mobile-equipped visitors in a complex museum. Neural Computing and Applications (2019), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Jinxian Qi, Guozhang Jiang, Gongfa Li, Ying Sun, and Bo Tao. 2019. Intelligent human-computer interaction based on surface EMG gesture recognition. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 61378--61387.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jun Qi, Po Yang, Martin Hanneghan, Dina Fan, Zhikun Deng, and Feng Dong. 2016. Ellipse fitting model for improving the effectiveness of life-logging physical activity measures in an Internet of Things environment. Iet Networks 5, 5 (2016), 107--113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Wilhelm Victor Rasche, Katharina Schäfer, Matthias Wille, Sabine Theis, Christopher Schlick, and Alexander Mertens. 2016. Self monitoring-an age-related comparison. Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
- Vijay Kumar Ravishankar, Winslow Burleson, and Diane Mahoney. 2015. Smart home strategies for user-centered functional assessment of older adults. International Journal of Automation and Smart Technology 5, 4 (2015), 233--242.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sai Deepika Regani, Qinyi Xu, Beibei Wang, Min Wu, and KJ Ray Liu. 2019. Driver authentication for smart car using wireless sensing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 3 (2019), 2235--2246.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y Rogers, H Sharp, and J Preece. 2013. Design de Interação: além dea interação humano-computador.Google Scholar
- Virpi Roto, EL-C Law, Arnold POS Vermeeren, and Jettie Hoonhout. 2011. User experience white paper: Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. (2011).Google Scholar
- Claire Rowland, Elizabeth Goodman, Martin Charlier, Ann Light, and Alfred Lui. 2015. Designing connected products: UX for the consumer Internet of Things. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliver Sack and Carsten Röcker. 2014. "Like a Family Member Who Takes Care of Me" Users' Anthropomorphic Representations and Trustworthiness of Smart Home Environments. Journal ISSN 2368 (2014), 6103.Google Scholar
- Christos Sardianos, Iraklis Varlamis, George Dimitrakopoulos, Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos, Abdullah Alsalemi, Faycal Bensaali, Yassine Himeur, and Abbes Amira. 2020. Rehab-c: Recommendations for energy habits change. Future Generation Computer Systems 112 (2020), 394--407.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisa Schuhmacher, Anne Pagenkopf, Ragavendra Lingamaneni, and Jürgen Scheible. 2018. Emotion Enhancement through Ubiquitous Media Technology in a Smart Kitchen Environment. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 317--325.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grace Shin, Yuanyuan Feng, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, and Nicci Gafinowitz. 2019. Beyond novelty effect: a mixed-methods exploration into the motivation for long-term activity tracker use. JAMIA open 2, 1 (2019), 62--72.Google Scholar
- Lukas Sigrist, Rehan Ahmed, Andres Gomez, and Lothar Thiele. 2020. Harvesting-aware optimal communication scheme for infrastructure-less sensing. ACM Transactions on Internet of Things 1, 4 (2020), 1--26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra Souza Rodrigues, Vinicius Luiz da Silva Genesio, Debora Maria Barroso Paiva, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2020. A Case Study on How Brazilian Companies Deal with the User Experience in IoT Projects. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. 1--7.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gina Lee Sprint, Diane J Cook, and Roschelle Fritz. 2020. Behavioral Differences Between Subject Groups Identified Using Smart Homes and Change Point Detection. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (2020).Google Scholar
- Rodney A Stewart, Rachelle M Willis, Kriengsak Panuwatwanich, and Oz Sahin. 2013. Showering behavioural response to alarming visual display monitors: longitudinal mixed method study. Behaviour & Information Technology 32, 7 (2013), 695--711.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elena Torta, Franz Werner, David O Johnson, James F Juola, Raymond H Cuijpers, Marco Bazzani, Johannes Oberzaucher, John Lemberger, Hadas Lewy, and Joseph Bregman. 2014. Evaluation of a small socially-assistive humanoid robot in intelligent homes for the care of the elderly. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 76, 1 (2014), 57--71.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noam Tractinsky. 2018. The usability construct: a dead end? Human-Computer Interaction 33, 2 (2018), 131--177.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Milka Trajkova and Aqueasha Martin-Hammond. 2020. "Alexa is a Toy": Exploring Older Adults' Reasons for Using, Limiting, and Abandoning Echo. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuji Uema and Kazutaka Inoue. 2017. Toward large scale study using smart eyewear. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 712--716.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas van de Werff, Karin Niemantsverdriet, Harm van Essen, and Berry Eggen. 2017. Evaluating interface characteristics for shared lighting systems in the office environment. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 209--220.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristof Van Laerhoven, Mario Wenzel, Anouk Geelen, Christopher Hübel, Maike Wolters, Antje Hebestreit, Lene Frost Andersen, Pieter van't Veer, and Thomas Kubiak. 2017. Experiences from a wearable-mobile acquisition system for ambulatory assessment of diet and activity. In Proceedings of the 4th international Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction. 1--8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elena Vildjiounaite, Ville Huotari, Johanna Kallio, Vesa Kyllönen, Satu-Marja Mäkelä, and Georgy Gimel'farb. 2018. Detection of Prolonged Stress in Smart Office. In Science and Information Conference. Springer, 1253--1261.Google Scholar
- Jorick Vissers, Lode De Bot, and Bieke Zaman. 2013. MemoLine: evaluating long-term UX with children. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 285--288.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering. 1--10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Qianli Xu, Jamie SL Ng, Odelia Y Tan, and Zhiyong Huang. 2015. Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective. Universal access in the information society 14, 4 (2015), 477--486.Google Scholar
- Supriya Yadav and Gareth Howells. 2017. Analysis of ICMetrics features/technology for wearable devices IOTsensors. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (EST). IEEE, 175--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sihao Yang, Bin Gao, Long Jiang, Jikun Jin, Zhao Gao, Xiaole Ma, and Wai Lok Woo. 2018. IoT structured long-term wearable social sensing for mental wellbeing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 2 (2018), 3652--3662.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fenghua Zhu, Yisheng Lv, Yuanyuan Chen, Xiao Wang, Gang Xiong, and Fei-Yue Wang. 2019. Parallel transportation systems: toward IoT-enabled smart urban traffic control and management. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 10 (2019), 4063--4071.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martina Ziefle, Philipp Brauner, Felix Heidrich, Christian Möllering, Kriz Lee, and Claudia Armbrüster. 2014. Understanding requirements for textile input devices individually tailored interfaces within home environments. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 587--598.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Longitudinal user experience studies in the IoT domain: a brief panorama and challenges to overcome
Recommendations
UX research in the software industry: an investigation of long-term UX practices
IHC '22: Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSoftware industry has sought to apply practices that provide a more meaningful User eXperience (UX) and help maintain a sustainable business. UX Research practices allows conducting research and evaluations with users from the application of methods and ...
An exploratory study of rethinking user experience in the internet of things
AbstractDespite the technical and ubiquitous nature of the Internet-of-Things (IoT), it must, at some point-of-time, make a stop to acknowledge the importance of User-eXperience (UX) in the success of any IoT endeavor. Diversity and smartness of things ...
Narrative agency and user experience in transmedia narratives: Brazilian telenovelas case
CLIHC '15: Proceedings of the Latin American Conference on Human Computer InteractionThis short paper proposes a reflection about the transmedia strategies in brazilian telenovelas, more specifically on how is the user experience in this kind of narratives. The user experience design in these narratives in multiple platforms is key to ...
Comments