skip to main content
10.1145/3638067.3638096acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyzing the Results of a Gerontology Data Collection Instrument - How do Specialists and Non-specialists Interpret the Data?

Published:24 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Gerontological Care Plan (PAGe, in Portuguese) is an instrument used by Gerontology professionals in the multidimensional assessment of the elderly. The instrument can be applied by professionals who are not specialists, but who work with the elderly public. This paper reports on the experience of different profiles of professionals analyzing the results generated by this instrument. Our objective is to investigate whether a non-specialist in the field of Gerontology can see the results of the PAGe and make a referral or a proposal for an intervention with the target users that is close to the analysis made by the specialist. The need to test this hypothesis arose in the context of an extension project with the elderly, where it is not always possible to have a gerontologist present to apply this instrument, but it is part of the study protocol. Four volunteers analyzed the results of seven PAGes previous applied, two specialists in Gerontology and two non-specialists; the PAGe results used in the study consist of a table with scores that classify a risk called “biopsychosocial vulnerability of the elderly” and two radar-type graphs with information on the domains addressed in the instrument. The results show that both professionals and non-professionals interpret the graphs and tables in a similar way and have the same perceptions about the clinical condition of the elderly person, however, the specialist makes suggestions for more holistic referrals and interventions, considering different aspects of the life of this elderly person.

References

  1. Meire Cachioni, Isabela Zaine, Tássia Monique Chiarelli, Lilian Ourém Batista Vieira Cliquet, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, Bruna Carolina Rodrigues da Cunha, Leonardo Fernandes Scalco, Brunela Della Maggiori Orlandi, C Pimentel Maria da Graça, and Samila Sathler Tavares Batistoni. 2019. Aprendizagem ao longo de toda a vida e letramento digital de idosos: um modelo multidisciplinar de intervenção com o apoio de um aplicativo. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Envelhecimento Humano 16, 1 (2019), 18–24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandra Lindy Silva Cezar. 2018. Desenvolvimento e validação de conteúdo da Avaliação Multidimensional do Idoso do Plano de Atenção Gerontológica - PAGe. Master’s thesis. Universidade de São Paulo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Marco Túlio Gualberto Cintra, Felipe Ferreira Guimarães, Cislene Teixeira de Souza, Fernanda Silva Trindade Luz, Érica Dias Murta, Maria Aparecida Camargos Bicalho, and Edgar Nunes de Moraes. 2019. Fragilidade de idosos atendidos em ambulatório de geriatria segundo a escala visual de fragilidade. Geriatr., Gerontol. Aging (Impr.) (2019), 17–23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lilian Ourém Batista Vieira Cliquet, Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel, Samila Sathler Tavares Batistoni, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, Isabela Zaine, and Meire Cachioni. 2023. Use of smartphones by older adults: characteristics and reports of students enrolled at a University of the Third Age (U3A). PerCursos 24 (2023), 1–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Paraná. 2018. Avaliação multidimensional do idoso. https://www.saude.pr.gov.br/sites/default/arquivos_restritos/files/documento/2020-04/avaliacaomultiddoidoso_2018_atualiz.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Suzane Santos dos Santos, Rafael do Monte Paixão, Brunela Della Maggiori Orlandi, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, 2023. ePAGe: Sistematização do Plano de Atenção Gerontológica (PAGe). https://doi.org/10.14210/cotb.v14.p179-186. Anais do Computer on the Beach 14 (2023), 179–186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Karina de Lima Flauzino, Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel, Samila Sathler Tavares Batistoni, Isabela Zaine, Lilian Ourém Batista Vieira, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, and Meire Cachioni. 2020. Letramento Digital para Idosos: percepções sobre o ensino-aprendizagem. Educação & Realidade 45 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5335/rbceh.v16i1.9751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mariana Gomes and Ida Lichtig. 2005. Evaluation of the use of a questionnaire by non-specialists to detect hearing loss in preschool Brazilian children. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 28, 2 (2005), 171–174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Niall Andre Munson Klyn, Claire Letendre, Neeha Shrestha, Bruce L Lambert, and Sumitrajit Dhar. 2021. Interpretability of the audiogram by audiologists and physician non-specialists. International Journal of Audiology 60, 2 (2021), 133–139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Maria Elisa Gonzalez Manso, Andreia Veloso Osti, Nelio Fernandes Borrozino, and Leandro Tadeu Prazeres Maresti. 2018. Avaliação multidimensional do idoso: resultados em um grupo de indivíduos vinculados a uma operadora de planos de saúde. Revista Kairós-Gerontologia 21, 1 (2018), 191–211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar Nunes de Moraes, Juliana Alves do Carmo, Flávia Lanna de Moraes, Raquel Souza Azevedo, Carla Jorge Machado, and Dalia Elena Romero Montilla. 2016. Índice de Vulnerabilidade Clínico Funcional-20 (IVCF-20): reconhecimento rápido do idoso frágil. Revista de Saúde Pública 50 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John A. Naslund, Deepak Tugnawat, Aditya Anand, Zafra Cooper, Sona Dimidjian, Christopher G. Fairburn, Steven D. Hollon, Udita Joshi, Azaz Khan, Chunling Lu, Lauren M. Mitchell, Shital Muke, Abhijit Nadkarni, Rohit Ramaswamy, Juliana L. Restivo, Ritu Shrivastava, Abhishek Singh, Daisy R. Singla, Donna Spiegelman, Anant Bhan, and Vikram Patel. 2021. Digital training for non-specialist health workers to deliver a brief psychological treatment for depression in India: Protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials 102 (2021), 106267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106267Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Roger Pressman and Bruce Maxim. 2016. Engenharia de Software-8ª Edição. McGraw Hill Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamila Rodrigues, Isabela Zaine, Brunela Orlandi, and Maria da Graça Pimentel. 2021. Ensinando configurações do smartphone e aplicações sociais para o público 60+ por meio de aulas semanais e intervenções remotas. In Anais do XII Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador para a Web Social (Evento Online). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5753/waihcws.2021.17541Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Suzane Santos dos Santos, Erick Modesto Campos, and Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues. 2022. EmoFrame: Prototype of a Framework to Assess Users’ Emotional Responses. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17615-9_20. In HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and Interaction, Masaaki Kurosu, Sakae Yamamoto, Hirohiko Mori, Marcelo M. Soares, Elizabeth Rosenzweig, Aaron Marcus, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Don Harris, and Wen-Chin Li (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 282–301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Isabela Zaine, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, Caio César Viel, Bruna Carolina Rodrigues da Cunha, Samila Sathler Tavares Batistoni, Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel, and Meire Cachioni. 2020. Um estudo sobre letramento digital para idosos com o apoio de um aplicativo móvel personalizável. Estudos Interdisciplinares sobre o Envelhecimento 25, 2 (2020), 219–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing the Results of a Gerontology Data Collection Instrument - How do Specialists and Non-specialists Interpret the Data?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHC '23: Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          October 2023
          791 pages
          ISBN:9798400717154
          DOI:10.1145/3638067

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 January 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format