Caio Nunes
Ticianne Darin
ABSTRACT
Self-determination theory (SDT) is a psychological theory that has proven relevant in human-computer interaction (HCI) and games studies by providing a greater understanding of what constitutes an engaging experience. SDT conceptualizes intrinsic motivation, described as voluntary behaviors motivated by the person’s interest. One approach to evaluate intrinsic motivation in different contexts is using the self-report questionnaire Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). This paper proposes the cross-cultural adaptation of IMI in its 22-item version, named Task Evaluation Questionnaire, into Brazilian Portuguese. We used the five steps for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires proposed by Beaton: Translation, Synthesis, Back-translation, Expert Committee, and Pre-testing. To assure the validity of the translated version, we performed statistical tests, namely, Student’s T-test for independent samples, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The results showed evidence of the questionnaire’s validity and reliability.
- Gazihan Alankus and Caitlin Kelleher. 2012. Reducing compensatory motions in video games for stroke rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2049–2058.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Renan Vinicius Aranha and Fátima LS Nunes. 2022. Player Experience with Brazilian accent: development and validation of PX-BR, a summarized instrument in Portuguese. In XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dorcas Beaton, Claire Bombardier, Francis Guillemin, and Marcos Bosi Ferraz. 2002. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. New York: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 12 (2002), 1–29.Google Scholar
- Max V Birk, Cheralyn Atkins, Jason T Bowey, and Regan L Mandryk. 2016. Fostering intrinsic motivation through avatar identification in digital games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2982–2995.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bojan Blažica and James R Lewis. 2015. A slovene translation of the system usability scale: The SUS-SI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 2 (2015), 112–117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carlos Carbonell Carrera, Jose Luis Saorin Perez, and Jorge de la Torre Cantero. 2018. Teaching with AR as a tool for relief visualization: Usability and motivation study. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 27, 1 (2018), 69–84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher P Cerasoli, Jessica M Nicklin, and Michael T Ford. 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin 140, 4 (2014), 980.Google Scholar
- Maria Aparecida Conti, Betzabeth Slater, and Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre. 2009. Validação e reprodutibilidade da Escala de Evaluación de Insatisfación Corporal para Adolescentes. Revista de Saúde Pública 43, 3 (2009), 515–524.Google Scholar
- Ticianne Darin, Nayana Carneiro, David Miranda, and Bianca Coelho. 2023. Challenges in Evaluating Players’ Interaction with Digital Games. In Grand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment Computing in Brazil-GranDGamesBR 2020–2030: First Forum, GranDGamesBR 2020, Recife, Brazil, November 7-10, 2020, and Second Forum, GranDGamesBR 2021, Gramado, Brazil, October 18–21, 2021, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, 1–24.Google Scholar
- Edward L Deci, Haleh Eghrari, Brian C Patrick, and Dean R Leone. 1994. Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of personality 62, 1 (1994), 119–142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2008. Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of happiness studies 9 (2008), 1–11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yadolah Dodge. 2008. The concise encyclopedia of statistics. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- António Manuel Fonseca and António de Paula Brito. 2001. Propriedades psicométricas da versão portuguesa do Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMIp) em contextos de actividade física e desportiva. Análise Psicológica 19, 1 (2001), 59–76.Google Scholar
- Shelly L Gable and Jonathan Haidt. 2005. What (and why) is positive psychology?Review of general psychology 9, 2 (2005), 103–110.Google Scholar
- Marinel Gerritsen, Catherine Nickerson, Andreu Van Hooft, Frank Van Meurs, Hubert Korzilius, Ulrike Nederstigt, Marianne Starren, and Roger Crijns. 2010. English in product advertisements in non-English-speaking countries in Western Europe: Product image and comprehension of the text. Journal of Global Marketing 23, 4 (2010), 349–365.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2010. Experience design: Technology for all the right reasons. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics 3, 1 (2010), 1–95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonja M Hunt, Jordi Alonso, Denis Bucquet, Mauro Niero, Ingela Wiklund, Stephen McKenna, 1991. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. Health Policy 19, 1 (1991), 33–44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philip T Kortum and Aaron Bangor. 2013. Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29, 2 (2013), 67–76.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Douglas Fabiano Lourenço, Elenice Valentim Carmona, and Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes. 2022. Tradução e adaptação transcultural da System Usability Scale para o português do Brasil. Aquichan 22, 2 (2022), 4.Google Scholar
- David Markland and Lew Hardy. 1997. On the factorial and construct validity of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory: Conceptual and operational concerns. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 68, 1 (1997), 20–32.Google Scholar
- Edward McAuley, Terry Duncan, and Vance V Tammen. 1989. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 60, 1 (1989), 48–58.Google Scholar
- David Miranda, Carmen Li, and Ticianne Darin. 2021. Ues-br: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the user engagement scale for brazilian portuguese. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CHI PLAY (2021), 1–22.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vera Monteiro, Lourdes Mata, and Francisco Peixoto. 2015. Intrinsic motivation inventory: Psychometric properties in the context of first language and mathematics learning. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 28 (2015), 434–443.Google Scholar
- Carlise Rigon Dalla Nora, Elma Zoboli, and Margarida M Vieira. 2018. Validation by experts: importance in translation and adaptation of instruments. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem 38 (2018).Google Scholar
- Heather L O’Brien and Elaine G Toms. 2010. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 1 (2010), 50–69.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert W Plant and Richard M Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of personality 53, 3 (1985), 435–449.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnmarshall Reeve, Glen Nix, and Diane Hamm. 2003. Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice.Journal of educational psychology 95, 2 (2003), 375.Google Scholar
- Scott Rigby and Richard Ryan. 2007. The player experience of need satisfaction (PENS) model. Immersyve Inc (2007), 1–22.Google Scholar
- RM Ryan and EL Deci. 2006. Intrinsic motivation inventory (IMI). Self-Determination Theory, An Approach to Human Motivation and Personality.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan. 1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of personality and social psychology 43, 3 (1982), 450.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan, James P Connell, and Robert W Plant. 1990. Emotions in nondirected text learning. Learning and individual differences 2, 1 (1990), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2017. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2020. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology 61 (2020), 101860.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci, 2002. Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research 2 (2002), 3–33.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan, Richard Koestner, and Edward L Deci. 1991. Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and emotion 15, 3 (1991), 185–205.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan, Valerie Mims, and Richard Koestner. 1983. Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of personality and Social Psychology 45, 4 (1983), 736.Google Scholar
- M Joseph Sirgy. 2002. The psychology of quality of life. Vol. 12. Springer.Google Scholar
- Constantine Stephanidis, Gavriel Salvendy, Margherita Antona, Jessie YC Chen, Jianming Dong, Vincent G Duffy, Xiaowen Fang, Cali Fidopiastis, Gino Fragomeni, Limin Paul Fu, 2019. Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35, 14 (2019), 1229–1269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Efi Tsitskari and Olga Kouli. 2010. Intrinsic motivation, perception of sport competence, and life-satisfaction of children in a Greek summer sport camp. World Leisure Journal 52, 4 (2010), 279–289.Google ScholarCross Ref
- April Tyack and Elisa D Mekler. 2020. Self-determination theory in HCI games research: current uses and open questions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–22.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W Paul Vogt and Burke Johnson. 2011. Dictionary of statistics & methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Sage.Google Scholar
- Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim, Giani Petri, and Adriano Ferreti Borgatto. 2018. Meega+ kids: A model for the evalua-tion of educational games for compu-ting education in secondary school. INCoD-Brazilian Institute for Digital Convergence (2018).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Cross-cultural adaptation of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory Task Evaluation Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese
Recommendations
Motivation crowding in online product reviewing: A qualitative study of amazon reviewers
AbstractThis research explores online reviewers’ motivations and how different motives interact with one another. Through in-depth interviews with Amazon reviewers and a six-month observation of the reviewers’ forums, the study found that ...
When carrots and sticks meet: A mixed-methods study on internet taxi drivers’ job engagement in the IT-driven sharing economy
AbstractInformation technology (IT)-enabled taxi services facilitate people's lives. However, little is known about how Internet taxi employees are motivated and how motivation relates to their job engagement. Using a mixed-methods design, ...
Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance
Research on the effectiveness of gamification has proliferated over the last few years, but the underlying motivational mechanisms have only recently become object of empirical research. It has been suggested that when perceived as informational, ...
Comments