skip to main content
10.1145/3474624.3476018acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lyzeli: a tool for identifying the clues in survey research data

Published:05 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Survey research is one of the most used empirical research methods, and it is a means to contribute to theory development. A survey can be exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory. Whatever the objective, it will generate data that may support the construction of a theory or validate it. However, researchers must carefully evaluate data so they can transform them into useful information for science. Little is said about how complex and susceptible to human failures this process can be. We note that all the data analysis work is still highly manual and exhausting for the researcher, who is not always qualified to perform data analysis and, sometimes, can make mistakes in this process, inserting wrong numbers or calculating something wrong. Some existing tools can support this process but do not specifically focus on analyzing survey responses, combining valuable qualitative and quantitative analysis of responses. In this study, we introduce Lyzeli, a tool designed to assist researchers in analyzing and correlating survey responses. The proposed tool aims to deliver automatic detection of question types, sentiment analysis of responses, data filtering, word cloud, word count, graphics, codification for open-based questions answers.

Tool Demonstration: https://youtu.be/e2w4TfhlxBY

References

  1. Ahmad Nauman Ghazi, Kai Petersen, Sri Sai Vijay Raj Reddy, and Harini Nekkanti. 2019. Survey Research in Software Engineering: Problems and Mitigation Strategies. IEEE Access 7(2019), 24703–24718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Scientific Software Development GmbH. 2021. ATLAS.ti. Retrieved June 06, 2021 https://atlasti.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. VERBI GmbH. 2021. MAXQDA. Retrieved June 06, 2021 https://www.maxqda.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Facebook Inc. 2021. React. Retrieved May 31, 2021 https://reactjs.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. QSR International. 2021. NVivo. Retrieved June 07, 2021 https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nildo Silva Junior, Larissa Rocha, Luana Almeida Martins, and Ivan Machado. 2020. A survey on test practitioners’ awareness of test smells. In Proceedings of the XXIII Iberoamerican Conference on Software Engineering(CIbSE’ 2020). Curran Associates, Salvador,BA, Brazil, 462–475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Leila Karita, Brunna Caroline Mourão, Luana Almeida Martins, Larissa Rocha Soares, and Ivan Machado. 2021. Software industry awareness on sustainable software engineering: a Brazilian perspective. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development 9 (2021), 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Barbara Kitchenham and Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. 2003. Principles of Survey Research Part 6: Data Analysis. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 28, 2 (March 2003), 24–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakravanti Rajagopalachari Kothari. 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International, New Delhi, India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sara Mendes Oliveira Lima, Denivan Campos, Larissa Rocha Soares, and Ivan Machado. 2020. Unveiling Practitioners Awareness of Android Apps Regression Testing through an Expert Survey. In Proceedings of the 34th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (Natal, Brazil) (SBES ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422392.3422470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jefferson Seide Molléri, Kai Petersen, and Emilia Mendes. 2020. An empirically evaluated checklist for surveys in software engineering. Information and Software Technology 119 (2020), 106240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Finn Nielsen. 2011. A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. CoRR abs/1103.2903 (03 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. The University of Sheffield. 2020. GATE - General Architecture for Text Engineering. Retrieved June 07, 2021 https://gate.ac.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Quirkos. 2021. Quirkos. Retrieved June 06, 2021 https://www.quirkos.com/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Provalis Research. 2021. Provalis Research. Retrieved June 06, 2021 https://provalisresearch.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Predictive Analytics Today. 2021. Top 14 qualitative data analysis software. Retrieved June 06, 2021 https://www.predictiveanalyticstoday.com/top-qualitative-data-analysis-software/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tryolabs. 2013. LibreQDA. Retrieved June 07, 2021 https://github.com/tryolabs/libreQDA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stefan Wagner, Daniel Mendez, Michael Felderer, Daniel Graziotin, and Marcos Kalinowski. 2020. Challenges in Survey Research. In Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering, Michael Feldererand Guilherme Horta Travassos (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 93–125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthew Weinstein. 2020. TAMS. Retrieved June 07, 2021 https://tamsys.sourceforge.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SBES '21: Proceedings of the XXXV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
    September 2021
    473 pages
    ISBN:9781450390613
    DOI:10.1145/3474624

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format