skip to main content
10.1145/3613372.3613407acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Thematic Synthesis on Empathy in Software Engineering based on the Practitioners' Perspective

Published:25 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Context: Empathy is the ability to understand and share the emotions of others. Despite its relevance for research and practice in software engineering, it is still an under-researched topic. Aims: To investigate the meaning, importance, practices, and effects of empathy from the perspective of software practitioners. Method: We apply a thematic synthesis of grey literature. We analyzed 22 articles from DEV, an online community used by software developers. Results: We found that empathy has different meanings for software practitioners. The word is used to express understanding, compassion, and perspective-taking, among other meanings. Practitioners consider empathy important, undervalued, needed, and wanted. The study points out 19 empathetic practices in SE, such as adopting good programming practices, understanding others, being compassionate, and being mindful. It also lists 28 effects of these practices, including quality improvement, better products, and build trust. Conclusion: We organize this body of knowledge in a framework supporting new research efforts. The framework may also support software professionals to develop empathetic skills in SE.

References

  1. Silvia T Acuna, Natalia Juristo, and Ana M Moreno. 2006. Emphasizing human capabilities in software development. IEEE software 23, 2 (2006), 94–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Deborah Bach. 2020. Empathy and innovation: How Microsoft’s cultural shift is leading to new product development. https://news.microsoft.com/innovation-stories/empathy-innovation-accessibility/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lidiany Cerqueira, Sávio Freire, João Pedro Silva Bastos, Rodrigo Spínola, Manoel Mendonça, and José Amancio Macedo Santos. 2023. A Thematic Synthesis on Empathy in Software Engineering based on the Practitioners’ Perspective - Supplementary Material. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8217909Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Daniela S Cruzes and Tore Dyba. 2011. Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In 2011 international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. IEEE, 275–284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Benjamin MP Cuff, Sarah J Brown, Laura Taylor, and Douglas J Howat. 2016. Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion review 8, 2 (2016), 144–153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mark H Davis. 2018. Empathy: A social psychological approach. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jean Decety. 2020. Empathy in medicine: what it is, and how much we really need it. The American journal of medicine 133, 5 (2020), 561–566.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jean Decety and Claire Holvoet. 2021. The emergence of empathy: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Developmental Review 62 (2021), 100999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jean Decety and Philip L Jackson. 2004. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews 3, 2 (2004), 71–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jean Decety and Philip L Jackson. 2006. A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current directions in psychological science 15, 2 (2006), 54–58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Steve Denning. 2021. How empathy helped generate a 2 Trillion company. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2021/07/18/how-empathy-helped-generate-a-two-trillion-dollar-company/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Edson Dias, Paulo Meirelles, Fernando Castor, Igor Steinmacher, Igor Wiese, and Gustavo Pinto. 2021. What makes a great maintainer of open source projects?. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 982–994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Eliezer Dutra, Bruna Diirr, and Gleison Santos. 2021. Human factors and their influence on software development teams-a tertiary study. In Proceedings of the XXXV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 442–451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Karen E Gerdes and Elizabeth Segal. 2011. Importance of empathy for social work practice: Integrating new science. Social work 56, 2 (2011), 141–148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Karen E Gerdes and Elizabeth A Segal. 2009. A social work model of empathy. Advances in Social Work 10, 2 (2009), 114–127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gerald A Gladstein. 1983. Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, developmental, and social psychology perspectives.Journal of counseling psychology 30, 4 (1983), 467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrea Goulet. 2019. Empathy is a technical skill. https://www.infoq.com/articles/empathy-technical-skill/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashini Gunatilake, John Grundy, Ingo Mueller, and Rashina Hoda. 2023. Empathy models and software engineering — A preliminary analysis and taxonomy. Journal of Systems and Software (2023), 111747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111747Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Justin L Hess, Johannes Strobel, and Rui Pan. 2016. Voices from the workplace: Practitioners’ perspectives on the role of empathy and care within engineering. Engineering Studies 8, 3 (2016), 212–242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Martin L Hoffman. 1984. Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. Emotion, cognition, and behavior (1984), 103–131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Marco Iacoboni, Istvan Molnar-Szakacs, Vittorio Gallese, Giovanni Buccino, John C Mazziotta, and Giacomo Rizzolatti. 2005. Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS biology 3, 3 (2005), e79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Adi Ignatius. 2021. Microsoft’s Satya Nadella on flexible work, the metaverse, and the power of empathy. https://hbr.org/2021/10/microsofts-satya-nadella-on-flexible-work-the-metaverse-and-the-power-of-empathyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pauline Irving and David Dickson. 2004. Empathy: towards a conceptual framework for health professionals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 17, 4 (2004), 212–220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Fernando Kamei, Gustavo Pinto, Igor Wiese, Márcio Ribeiro, and Sérgio Soares. 2021. What evidence we would miss if we do not use grey literature?. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Diane Kunyk and Joanne K Olson. 2001. Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy. Journal of Advanced nursing 35, 3 (2001), 317–325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Per Lenberg, Robert Feldt, Lucas Gren, Lars Göran Wallgren Tengberg, Inga Tidefors, and Daniel Graziotin. 2017. Qualitative software engineering research–reflections and guidelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.08341 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Per Lenberg, Robert Feldt, and Lars Göran Wallgren. 2015. Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and software 107 (2015), 15–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Paul Luo Li, Amy J Ko, and Jiamin Zhu. 2015. What makes a great software engineer?. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol. 1. IEEE, 700–710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Patricia L Lockwood. 2016. The anatomy of empathy: Vicarious experience and disorders of social cognition. Behavioural brain research 311 (2016), 255–266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Herbert A Marlowe. 1986. Social intelligence: Evidence for multidimensionality and construct independence.Journal of educational psychology 78, 1 (1986), 52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Savita Pahuja. 2015. Practicing empathy driven development (EDD). https://www.infoq.com/news/2015/06/empathy-development/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Maria Papoutsoglou, Johannes Wachs, and Georgia M Kapitsaki. 2021. Mining DEV for social and technical insights about software development. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). IEEE, 415–419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Cassandra Pehrson, Smita C Banerjee, Ruth Manna, Megan Johnson Shen, Stacey Hammonds, Nessa Coyle, Carol A Krueger, Erin Maloney, Talia Zaider, and Carma L Bylund. 2016. Responding empathically to patients: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a communication skills training module for oncology nurses. Patient education and counseling 99, 4 (2016), 610–616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Dannilo Rabelo, Albert Lopes, Wendy Mendes, Cleidson de Souza, Kiev Gama, Danilo Monteiro, and Gustavo Pinto. 2022. The Role of Non-Technical Skills in the Software Development Market. In Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 31–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ronald E Riggio and Rebecca J Reichard. 2008. The emotional and social intelligences of effective leadership: An emotional and social skill approach. Journal of managerial psychology (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Margaret R Roller and Paul J Lavrakas. 2015. Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Tania Singer and Claus Lamm. 2009. The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156, 1 (2009), 81–96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Joachim Walther, Shari E Miller, and Nicola W Sochacka. 2017. A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education 106, 1 (2017), 123–148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Jamil Zaki and Kevin N Ochsner. 2012. The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature neuroscience 15, 5 (2012), 675–680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Thematic Synthesis on Empathy in Software Engineering based on the Practitioners' Perspective
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SBES '23: Proceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
          September 2023
          570 pages
          ISBN:9798400707872
          DOI:10.1145/3613372

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 September 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format