Rayelle Ingrid Vera Cruz S. Muniz
ABSTRACT
Data on the Web publishing and consumption practices have increased as the Web has become more than just a means of entertainment. In addition, many processes, guidelines and best practices have been proposed to facilitate both publication and data consumption. However, many data providers are unaware or does not make use of these initiatives, been unable to meet the challenges that arise when publishing data on the Web, which increasingly generates content-poor datasets, even with a domain of relevance. Given this scenario, this paper proposes a Data on the Web Maturity Model to assess the maturity of organizations or individuals in the process of publishing data on the Web from a technical point of view. The model was evaluated through a focus group, where it was possible to collect qualitative data in order to evolve the word. From the collected feedback, we arrived at version 1.0 of the model, presented in this article. Although a large part of the suggestions were included, some were registered for later consideration in a new evaluation.
- Payam Barnaghi, Amit Sheth, and Cory Henson. 2013. From data to actionable knowledge: big data challenges in the web of things. IEEE Intelligent Systems6 (2013), 6–11.Google Scholar
- Jörg Becker, Ralf Knackstedt, and Jens Pöppelbuss. 2009. Developing maturity models for IT management. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1, 3 (2009), 213–222.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joerg Becker, Bjoern Niehaves, Jens Poeppelbuss, and Alexander Simons. 2010. Maturity models in IS research. (2010).Google Scholar
- Richard Caralli, Mark Knight, and Austin Montgomery. 2012. Maturity models 101: A primer for applying maturity models to smart grid security, resilience, and interoperability. Technical Report. CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INST.Google Scholar
- Karina Moura da Silva. 2019. Um Modelo de Ciclo de Vida de Dados na Web. Master’s thesis. UFPE, Recife-PE.Google Scholar
- Lairson Emanuel R. de Alencar Oliveira, Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2017. Um Survey sobre Soluções para Publicação de Dados na Web sob a Perspectiva das Boas Práticas do W3C. In 32rd Brazilian Symposium on Databases.Google Scholar
- Humberto Rocha de Almeida Neto, Edviges Mariza Campos de Magalhães, Hermano Perrelli de Moura, Jose Gilson de Almeida Teixeira Filho, Claudia Cappelli, and Luiz Mauricio Fraga Martins. 2015. Evaluation of a Maturity Model for Agile Governance in ICT using Focus Group. In Proceedings of the annual conference on Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems: A Computer Socio-Technical Perspective, Vol. 1. SBC, 3–11.Google Scholar
- Tonia De Bruin, Ronald Freeze, Uday Kaulkarni, and Michael Rosemann. 2005. Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. (2005).Google Scholar
- Deirdre Lee Derilinx, Bernadette Farias Lóscio, and Phil Archer. 2015. Data on the Web Best Practices Use Cases and Requirements. https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/. Acessado em 18 de dezembro de 2018.Google Scholar
- Leigh Dodds and Andrew Newman. 2015. A guide to the Open Data Maturity Model - Assessing your open data publishing and use. https://theodi.org/article/open-data-maturity-model-2/. Acesso em 03 de abril de 2019.Google Scholar
- Renan Silva e Gibeon Júnior. 2018. Uma Proposta de Processo para Implantação de Dados Abertos em Instituições Públicas Brasileiras. iSys - Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação 11, 1(2018), 30–54.Google Scholar
- Steve Easterbrook, Janice Singer, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Daniela Damian. 2008. Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. (2008), 285–311.Google Scholar
- Peter Fraser, James Moultrie, and Mike Gregory. 2002. The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability. In IEEE international engineering management conference, Vol. 1. IEEE, 244–249.Google Scholar
- Fern Halper and Krish Krishnan. 2013. TDWi big data maturity model guide. Interpreting Your Assessment Score. TDWI Research 1 (2013), 16.Google Scholar
- Alan R Hevner, Salvatore T March, Jinsoo Park, and Sudha Ram. 2008. Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28, 1 (2008), 6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marijn Janssen, Yannis Charalabidis, and Anneke Zuiderwijk. 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information systems management 29, 4 (2012), 258–268.Google Scholar
- Jyrki Kontio, Laura Lehtola, and Johanna Bragge. 2004. Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE’04. Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on. IEEE, 271–280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Kucera, Dusan Chlapek, Jakub Klímek, and Martin Necaskỳ. 2015. Methodologies and Best Practices for Open Data Publication.. In DATESO. 52–64.Google Scholar
- Lester Allan Lasrado, Ravi Vatrapu, and Kim Normann Andersen. 2015. Maturity models development in is research: a literature review. In IRIS Selected Papers of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia 2015. Paper, Vol. 6.Google Scholar
- Bernadette Lóscio, Caroline Guimarães, and Newton Calegari. 2016. Data on the Web Best Practices: Challenges and Benefits. Open Data Reserach Symposium (ODRS 2016)(2016).Google Scholar
- Bernadette Farias Lóscio, C Burle, and N Calegari. 2017. Data on the Web Best Practices. https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/. Acessado em 05 de maio de 2019.Google Scholar
- Richard L Nolan. 1973. Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Commun. ACM 16, 7 (1973), 399–405.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira, Lairson Alencar Oliveira, Glória Fátima Barros Lima, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2016. Enabling a Unified View of Open Data Catalogs. In 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark C Paulk. 1995. The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process. Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
- Mark C Paulk, Bill Curtis, Mary Beth Chrissis, and Charles V Weber. 1993. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute. Technical Report. CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, DTIC Number ADA263403.Google Scholar
- Helton Douglas A. Santos, Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira, Glória Fátima A. B. Lima, Karina Moura Silva, Rayelle Vera Cruz S. Muniz, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2018. Investigations into data published and consumed on the Web: A Systematic Mapping Study. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 24, 1 (2018), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-018-0077-zGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Emanoel Carlos GF Silva, Marcelo Iury S Oliveira, Eduardo Oliveira, Kiev Santos da Gama, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2015. Um Survey sobre Plataformas de Mediação de Dados para Internet das Coisas. 42º Seminário Integrado de Software e Hardware (2015).Google Scholar
- Janice Singer, Susan E Sim, and Timothy C Lethbridge. 2008. Software engineering data collection for field studies. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, 9–34.Google Scholar
- Monica Chiarini Tremblay, Alan R Hevner, and Donald J Berndt. 2010. Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research.Cais 26, 27 (2010), 599–618.Google Scholar
- Roy Wendler. 2012. The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and software technology 54, 12 (2012), 1317–1339.Google Scholar
Recommendations
A Maturity Model for Scaling Agile Development
SEAA '15: Proceedings of the 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced ApplicationsAlthough the agile software development approaches have gained wide acceptance in practice, the concerns regarding the scalability and integration of agile approaches in traditional system development organizations have remained. The difficulty of ...
On continuous deployment maturity in customer projects
SAC '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied ComputingThe practice of making new software available to end users as soon as it gets implemented is becoming commonplace. This paper investigates a set of projects and their development practices in a mid-sized Finnish software company Solita Ltd. to ...
Maturity models: identifying the state-of-the-art and the scientific gaps from a bibliometric study
Maturity model has been increasingly approached by several researchers from various research areas in order to develop models that could assess the strengths and weaknesses of a system and/or a process, and to develop scripts for improvement. ...
Comments