Marcio Imamura
Rodrigo Santos
ABSTRACT
Context: Systems-of-Systems (SoS) are arrangements of independent systems that are increasingly present in everyday life and can be observed in domains such as healthcare, transport, and Industry 4.0, to mention a few. Problem: A significant concern regarding SoS refers to the constituent systems’ (CS) independence. CS are managed by different organizations that control them independently of SoS. Hence, the design of SoS is challenging as it involves careful investigation, allocation, and integration of CS to ensure proper operation. Solution: This paper provides a catalog of good practices and recommendations, herein referred to as “heuristics”, which can be applied to the SoS design. The main purpose of the catalog is to provide directions on what practitioners should consider during the design phase to ensure the proper operation of the SoS. IS theory: This research is based on the General Systems Theory that allows understanding SoS as a complex system constructed with independent systems. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping study (SMS) to identify which heuristics have been applied to SoS design. The results were discussed in a focus group with professionals to organize the heuristics. Summary of Results: After reaching a consensus on the focus group, we organized a catalog of fifteen heuristics into five categories: initiation, CS, interoperability, emergent behavior, and monitoring. Contributions and Impact in the IS area: The heuristics catalog, which is grounded in the literature, would support researchers and professionals in identifying critical issues during the SoS design phase.
- [1] T. Batista. Challenges for sos architecture description. In SESoS, pages 35–37, Montpellier, France, 2013.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [2] S. E. Beck and K. Manuel. Practical research methods for librarians and information professionals. Neal-Schuman Publishers New York, 2008.Google Scholar
- [3] J. Boardman and B. J. Sauser. System of systems - the meaning of of. In SoSE, pages 1–6, Los Angeles, USA, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [4] T. Bouziat, V. Camps, and S. Combettes. A cooperative sos architecting approach based on adaptive multi-agent systems. In SESoS, pages 8–16, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2018. IEEE.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [5] M. Butterfield, J. Pearlman, and S. Vickroy. A System-of-Systems Engineering GEOSS: Architectural Approach. IEEE Systems Journal, 2(3):321–332, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [6] S. Caplan. Using focus group methodology for ergonomic design. Ergonomics, 33(5):527–533, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [7] N. Churcher, S. Frater, C. P. Huynh, and W. Irwin. Supporting oo design heuristics. In ASWEC, pages 101–110, Melbourne, Australia, 2007. IEEE.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [8] S. da Silva Amorim, E. S. de Almeida, J. D. McGregor, and C. von Flach G. Chavez. When ecosystems collide: making systems of systems work. In ECSA, pages 1–4, Vienna, Austria, 2014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [9] J. Dahmann, G. Rebovich, and J. Lane. Systems engineering for capabilities. CrossTalk, 21:7, 11 2008.Google Scholar
- [10] P. Dersin. Systems of Systems, October 2014. IEEE-Reliability Society. Technical Committee on “Systems of Systems”, https://rs.ieee.org/technical-activities/technical-committees/systems-of-systems.html (Access in 28/02/2021).Google Scholar
- [11] S. Dhawan. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1):5–22, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [12] R. Dietterle. The future combat systems (FCS) overview. In MILCOM, pages 3269–3273 Vol. 5, Atlantic City, USA, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [13] L. Garcés and E. Y. Nakagawa. A process to establish, model and validate missions of systems-of-systems in reference architectures. In SAC, pages 1765–1772, Marrakech, Morocco, 2017.Google Scholar
- [14] G. Gigerenzer and W. Gaissmaier. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1):451–482, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [15] M. B. Gonçalves, F. Oquendo, and E. Y. Nakagawa. A meta-process to construct software architectures for system of systems. In SAC, pages 1411–1416, Salamanca, Spain, 2015.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [16] V. Graciano Neto, W. Manzano, A. Rohling, M. Ferreira, T. Volpato, and E. Nakagawa. Externalizing patterns for simulations in software engineering of systems-of-systems. In SAC, page 1687–1694, Pau, France, 2018.Google Scholar
- [17] J. Hacker, J. Vom Brocke, J. Handali, M. Otto, and J. Schneider. Virtually in this together – how web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the COVID-19 crisis. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5):563–584, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [18] M. Jamshidi. System of systems engineering-new challenges for the 21st century. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 23(5):4–19, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [19] R. Kazman, K. Schmid, C. B. Nielsen, and J. Klein. Understanding patterns for system of systems integration. In SoSE, pages 141–146, Hawaii, USA, 2013. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [20] B. Kitchenham and S. Charters. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. 2007.Google Scholar
- [21] B. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, and P. Brereton. Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews, volume 4. CRC Press, 2015.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [22] Q. Liang and S. H. Rubin. Randomisation in designing software tests for systems of systems. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 4(2-3):108–129, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [23] F. Lopes, S. Loss, A. Mendes, T. Batista, and R. Lea. Sos-centric middleware services for interoperability in smart cities systems. In Middleware, pages 1–6, Trento, Italy, 2016.Google Scholar
- [24] M. W. Maier. Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering, 1(4):267–284, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [25] T. McDermott. Developing systems thinking skills using healthcare as a case study. In SoSE, pages 240–244, Paris, France, 2018. IEEE.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [26] S. Mittal and L. Rainey. Harnessing emergence: The control and design of emergent behavior in system of systems engineering. In SummerSim, pages 1–10, San Diego, USA, 2015.Google Scholar
- [27] C. Nielsen, P. Larsen, J. Fitzgerald, J. Woodcock, and J. Peleska. Systems of systems engineering: Basic concepts, model-based techniques, and research directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 48(2), 2015.Google Scholar
- [28] J. Nielsen. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In SIGCHI, pages 152–158, Boston, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
- [29] F. Oquendo. Formally describing the software architecture of systems-of-systems with sosadl. In SoSE, pages 1–6, Kongsberg, Norway, 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [30] N. Ricci, A. M. Ross, and D. H. Rhodes. A generalized options-based approach to mitigate perturbations in a maritime security system-of-systems. Procedia Computer Science, 16:718–727, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [31] A. Riel. Object-Oriented Design Heuristics. Addison-Wesley, 1996.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [32] A. P. Sage and C. D. Cuppan. On the systems engineering and management of systems of systems and federations of systems. Information knowledge systems management, 2(4):325–345, 2001.Google Scholar
- [33] J.-P. Schneider, C. Teodorov, E. Senn, and J. Champeau. Towards a dynamic infrastructure for playing with systems of systems. In ECSA, pages 1–4, Vienna, Austria, 2014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [34] R. P. Singh, M. Javaid, R. Kataria, M. Tyagi, A. Haleem, and R. Suman. Significant applications of virtual reality for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(4):661–664, 2020. ISSN 1871-4021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [35] M. Vierhauser, R. Rabiser, P. Grünbacher, and B. Aumayr. A requirements monitoring model for systems of systems. In RE, pages 96–105, Ottawa, Canada, 2015.Google Scholar
- [36] D. Westmattelmann, J. Grotenhermen, M. Sprenger, and G. Schewe. The show must go on - Virtualisation of sport events during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Information Systems, pages 1–18, 2020.Google Scholar
- [37] D. Weyns and J. Andersson. On the challenges of self-adaptation in systems of systems. In SESoS, pages 47–51, Montpellier, France, 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [38] N. Wickramasinghe, S. Chalasani, R. Boppana, and A. Madni. Healthcare system of systems. In SoSE, pages 1–6, San Antonio, USA, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [39] B. M. Zaganelli, M. A. Nisenbaum, K. d. S. G. Alves, S. B. Marques, and G. Olinto. O grupo focal na ciência da informação. Informação & Sociedade, 25(3), 2015.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards a Catalog of Heuristics for the Design of Systems-of-Systems
Recommendations
On the Characterization of Missions of Systems-of-Systems
ECSAW '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture WorkshopsA system-of-systems (SoS) can be understood as a set of complex, independent, heterogeneous constituent systems, which are composed to form a larger and more complex system aiming at accomplishing a given mission. Each constituent system accomplishes ...
On the architecture-driven development of software-intensive systems-of-systems
ICSE '15: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2Nowadays, complex software-intensive systems have resulted from the integration of heterogeneous independent systems, thus leading to a new class of systems called Systems-of-Systems (SoS). As in any system, SoS architectures have been regarded as an ...
Towards an understanding of reliability of software-intensive systems-of-systems
Abstract Context:Large-scale software-intensive Systems-of-Systems (SoS) have become present in several critical domains and have sometimes depended on diverse trending technologies, such as cloud computing and machine learning. At ...
Comments