Gustavo Gatti Alves
ABSTRACT
Context: Technology has been used as a pillar of many governments, both in service provision and in information presentation and transparency, thus, the user experience in government tools is intrinsically linked to the population’s reliability in government. Problem: The presentation of government data on portals that provide this service of communication and transparency with public resources does not always convey this trust and usability. Solution: This work conducts a survey on the transparency portal of the Ministry of Health, on usability categories during portal navigation and their correlation with the users’ trust in the government. IS theory: This research was developed based on the General Systems Theory, emphasizing the interactions between the parts of the system and the environment. Method: An opinion survey was carried out using the transparency portal of the Ministry of Health, with questions in order to obtain and analyze the data. Results: With the data collection presented, it appears that 72.5% of users believe that the government is unreliable given its experience in seeking information on the transparency portal of the Ministry of Health. Contribution: The main contribution of this work is to show the need for usability assessments of government tools, considering factors related to user experience, in order to create accessible tools, stimulating the active participation of individuals in society and the advancement of rendered services.
- Frank Bannister and Regina Connolly. 2011. Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research. Government Information Quarterly 28, 2 (2011), 137–147.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Cheryl Barnes and Derek Gill. 2000. Declining government performance? Why citizens don’t trust government. New Zealand: State Services Commission (2000).Google Scholar
- Ardion Beldad, Menno De Jong, and Michaël Steehouder. 2011. I trust not therefore it must be risky: Determinants of the perceived risks of disclosing personal data for e-government transactions. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 6 (2011), 2233–2242.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ravi Bhalla. 2014. The omni-channel customer experience: Driving engagement through digitisation. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing 1, 4 (2014), 365–372.Google Scholar
- Brasil. 2016. DECRETO Nº 8.638, DE 15 DE JANEIRO DE 2016. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/decreto/d8638.html.Google Scholar
- Brasil. 2021. Controladoria-Geral da União. Sobre o Portal. https://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/sobre/o-que-e-e-como-funciona.Google Scholar
- Ramnath K Chellappa and Raymond G Sin. 2005. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information technology and management 6, 2 (2005), 181–202.Google Scholar
- Tao Chen, Wenshan Guo, Xian Gao, and Zhehao Liang. 2021. AI-based self-service technology in public service delivery: User experience and influencing factors. Government Information Quarterly 38, 4 (2021), 101520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chiara Gentile, Nicola Spiller, and Giuliano Noci. 2007. How to sustain the customer experience: An overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. European management journal 25, 5 (2007), 395–410.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donna L Hoffman and Thomas P Novak. 2009. Flow online: lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of interactive marketing 23, 1 (2009), 23–34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- IBGE. 2019. PNAD Contínua: acesso à internet e à televisão e posse de telefone móvel celular para uso pessoal 2019. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101794_informativo.pdf.Google Scholar
- Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Liliana Laranjo, and Enrico Coiera. 2019. Understanding and measuring user experience in conversational interfaces. Interacting with Computers 31, 2 (2019), 192–207.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Effie Lai-Chong Law, Virpi Roto, Marc Hassenzahl, Arnold POS Vermeeren, and Joke Kort. 2009. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 719–728.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jin-Myong Lee and Jong-Youn Rha. 2016. Personalization–privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016), 453–462.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Graeme Mclean, Khalid Al-Nabhani, and Alan Wilson. 2018. Developing a mobile applications customer experience model (MACE)-implications for retailers. Journal of Business Research 85 (2018), 325–336.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Graeme McLean and Alan Wilson. 2016. Evolving the online customer experience… is there a role for online customer support?Computers in Human Behavior 60 (2016), 602–610.Google Scholar
- Dorina Rajanen, Torkil Clemmensen, Netta Iivari, Yavuz Inal, Kerem Rızvanoğlu, Ashok Sivaji, and Amélie Roche. 2017. UX professionals’ definitions of usability and UX–A comparison between Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France and Malaysia. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 218–239.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanjit Kumar Roy, MS Balaji, Saalem Sadeque, Bang Nguyen, and TC Melewar. 2017. Constituents and consequences of smart customer experience in retailing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 124 (2017), 257–270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernd Schmitt. 1999. Experiential marketing. Journal of marketing management 15, 1-3 (1999), 53–67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Margaret L Sheng and Thompson SH Teo. 2012. Product attributes and brand equity in the mobile domain: The mediating role of customer experience. International journal of information management 32, 2 (2012), 139–146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Si Shi, Yi Wang, Xuanzhu Chen, and Qian Zhang. 2020. Conceptualization of omnichannel customer experience and its impact on shopping intention: A mixed-method approach. International Journal of Information Management 50 (2020), 325–336.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson SH Teo, Shirish C Srivastava, and LI Jiang. 2008. Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of management information systems 25, 3 (2008), 99–132.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bo Xiao and Izak Benbasat. 2007. E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS quarterly (2007), 137–209.Google Scholar
- Bin Yang, Long Wei, and Zihan Pu. 2020. Measuring and improving user experience through artificial intelligence aided design. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020), 3000.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Reliability Analysis with User Experience in Portal of Public Institution
Recommendations
Identification of Overpricing in the Purchase of Medication by the Federal Government of Brazil, Using Text Mining and Clustering Based on Ontology
ICCBDC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Cloud and Big Data ComputingIncreasing the transparency level in his actions and spending is one of the primary duties of the Brazilian Federal Government. The creation of laws that oblige full disclose of all its expenditures through transparency portals enables citizens to ...
The semantic public service portal (S-PSP)
ESWC'11: Proceedings of the 8th extended semantic web conference on The semanic web: research and applications - Volume Part IIOne of government's responsibilities is the provision of public services to its citizens, for example, education, health, transportation, and social services. Additionally, with the explosion of the Internet in the past 20 years, many citizens have ...
C2G Online Trust, Perceived Government Responsiveness and User Experience: A Pilot Survey in St. Petersburg, Russia
Electronic GovernmentAbstractThe paper presents the results of the pilot study of C2G online trust, that covers citizens’ trust in communication with the government via e-government, e-participation and social media channels. Based on the survey carried out in St. Petersburg, ...
Comments