skip to main content
10.1145/3229345.3229375acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research Project Selection and Classification using MCDA Methods

Published:04 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a case study of the construction and execution of a model for the ranking of projects submitted to the Scientific Initiation Program (PIBIC) of the University of Brasilia (UnB). In the execution of this work the Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) AHP and Promethee II methods were applied. The results obtained in each method were analyzed and compared. Hence, a model proposal for PIBIC projects selection is presented. The proposed model can be used in several project selection processes, maintaining a coherence and standard in the evaluations.

References

  1. Valerie Belton and Theodor Stewart. 2002. MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: An Integrated Approach. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dejan Bogdanovic, Djordje Nikolic, and Ivana Ilic. 2012. Mining method selection by integrated AHP and PROMETHEE method. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 84 (03 2012), 219--233. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652012000100023&nrm=isoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Denis Bouyssou. 1990. BUILDING CRITERIA: A PREREQUISITE FOR MCDA. LAMSADE, Universite de Paris Dauphine Place du Marechal De Lattre de Tassigny.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. P. BRANS and P. H. VINCKE. 1985. A preference ranking organization method, the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. In Mgmt. Sci., v. 31. 647--656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. R. Campos. 2011. Modelo de apoio à decisão multicritério para priorização de projetos em saneamento. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18157/tde-08022012-104925/pt-br.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Carladous, J. M. Tacnet, J. Dezert, D. Han, and M. Batton-Hubert. 2016. Evaluation of efficiency of torrential protective structures with new BF-TOPSIS methods. In 2016 19th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION). 2267--2274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Liuhao Chen and Zeshui Xu. 2015. A new prioritized multi-criteria outranking method: The prioritized PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 29, 5 (2015), 2099--2110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ting-Yu Chen. 2014. A PROMETHEE-based outranking method for multiple criteria decision analysis with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Soft Comput. 18, 5, 923--940. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Chen, D. M. Kilgour, and K. W. Hipel. 2011. A case-based distance approach to multiple criteria ranking. In ICSSSM11. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Thomas L. Saaty D. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. In Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Avanilton Marinho da Silva and Renata Maciel de Melo. 2017. Uma abordagem multicritério para a seleção de serviços de consultoria e certificação de Sistemas de Gestão da Qualidade. In Gest. Prod. online. In press.Epub Sep 28, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Afrânio Galdino de Araújo and Adiel Teixeira de Almeida. 2009. Apoio à decisão na seleção de investimentos em petróleo e gás: uma aplicação utilizando o método PROMETHEE. In Gest. Prod. {online}. 2009, vol.16, n.4, pp. 534--543.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ana Paula Henriques de Gusmão, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa, and Maisa Silva Mendonça. 2013. Group Decision Support Model for Prioritizing Information Systems based on a multicriteria method. (2013), 724--729. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paul Deitel and Harvey Deitel. 2011. Java How to program. Prentice Hall Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Carlos Bana e Costa and P. Vincke. 1990. MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION AID: AN OVERVIEW. Technical University of Lisbon (1ST), Lisboa, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Elmokrini, L. Benabbou, and A. Berrado. 2015. Multi-criteria distribution network selection. (2015), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Fallahi, H. Leung, and S. Chandana. 2009. An integrated ACO-AHP approach for resource management optimization. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 4335--4340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann, and Ian H Witten. 2009. The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter 11, 1 (2009), 10--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mark A Hall and Geoffrey Holmes. 2003. Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data engineering 15, 6 (2003), 1437--1447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Quantin Hayez, Bertrand Mareschal, and Yves De Smet. 2009. New GAIA Visualization Methods. In 2009 13th International Conference Information Visualisation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Adiel Teixeira de Almeida Hipólito Marcelo Losada López. 2014. Utilizando PROMETHEE V para seleção de portfólio de projetos de uma empresa de energia elétrica. Production 24, 3 (2014), 559--571.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Esra Karasakal and Pınar Aker. 2017. A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problems.. In Omega Volume 73, December 2017, Pages 79--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Huchang Liao and Zeshui Xub. 2013. Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE. In Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Cathy Macharis, Johan Springael, Klaas De Brucker, and Alain Verbeke. 2004. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 153, 2 (2004), 307--317. Management of the Future MCDA: Dynamic and Ethical Contributions.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Reza Tavakkoli Moghaddam, Alireza Sotoudeh Anvari, and Ali Siadat. 2015. A Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Facility Location Selection Using PROMETHEE Under a Fuzzy Environment. In Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation - 15th International Conference, (GDN) 2015 (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), Vol. 218. Springer, 145--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Louise PEDROSO, Kate Revoredo, and Fernanda Baião. 2013. Uma abordagem baseada em mineração de dados para apoio ao ciclo de vida de projetos de pesquisa e inovação. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (SBSI) (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramen Antonov Purba and Jakaria Sembiring. 2016. Selection of scholarship recipients by using Promethee method in Polytechnic Unggul LP3M Medan. (2016). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7873815/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. R. V. RAO and T. S. RAJESH. 2009. Software Selection in Manufacturing Industries Using a Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method, PROMETHEE. In Intelligent Information Management, 2009, 1, 159--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Dey Salvador Sanchez Rodriguez, Helder Gomes Costa, and Luiz Felipe Roris Rodriguez Scavarda do Carmo. 2013. Métodos de auxílio multicritério à decisão aplicados a problemas de PCP: Mapeamento da produção em periódicos publicados no Brasil.. In Gest. Prod., São Carlos, v. 20, n. 1, p. 134--146, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. T.L. Saaty. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=Xxi7AAAAIAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vanessa Batista de Sousa Silva, Fernando Schramm, and Hugo Riccely Cunha de Carvalho. 2014. O us od ométodo PROMETHEE para seleção de candidatos à bolsaformação do Pronatec. Production 24 (09 2014), 548--558. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132014000300005&nrm=isoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Herbert A. Simon. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision. Harpes and Row, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Antonio Vanderley Herrero Sola and Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota. 2011. APLICAÇÃO DO MÉTODO PROMETHEE NA SELEÇÃO DE MOTORES INDUSTRIAIS PARA MELHORIA DA EFICIÊNCIA ENERGÉTICA.. In XLIII Simposio Brasileiro de Pesquisa Operacional.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. BANU SOYLU. 2010. INTEGRATING PROMETHEEII WITH THE TCHEBYCHEFF FUNCTION FOR MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING. In International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making Vol. 9, No. 4 (2010) 525--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Marcia Danieli Szeremeta Spak. 2012. Proposta de uma metodologia de apoio à tomada de decisão para a localização de centros de distribuição no setor varejista de móveis e eletrodomésticos. Master's thesis. Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodney Stewart and Sherif Mohamed. 2002. IT/IS projects selection using multicriteria utility theory. In Logistics Information Management, Vol. 15. 254--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Christian Toinard, Timothée Ravier, Christophe Céerin, and Yanik Ngoko. 2015. The Promethee Method for Cloud Brokering with Trust and Assurance Criteria. In J2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshop. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. C. Wang, F. Zhou, and J. Vergeest. 2009. Multi-Objective Optimization for the Functional Configuration Design of Mobile Devices Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. In 2009 Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics. 137--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Xiaohan Yua, Zeshui Xub, and Ying Mac. 2013. Prioritized Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on the Idea of PROMETHEE. In Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research Project Selection and Classification using MCDA Methods

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SBSI '18: Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
      June 2018
      578 pages
      ISBN:9781450365598
      DOI:10.1145/3229345

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate181of557submissions,32%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader