skip to main content
10.1145/3229345.3229406acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Monitoring of Business Processes' non Functional Requirements based on Quality of Service

Published:04 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Business areas' managers should have access to business process indicators of their organizations to be capable of obtaining and analyzing information at real time during critical situations. However, the monitoring approaches commonly provided to such managers usually address only indicators at the level of the services implementing the business processes, which are technical measures directed to Information Technology (IT) managers. This paper introduces the StrAli-BAM (Strategic Alignment with Business Activity Monitoring) approach to assist strategic alignment between business and IT through monitoring non-functional business process requirements based on Quality of Service (QoS) levels. StrAli-BAM aims to enable business areas' managers to monitor the execution of business processes by focusing on the indicators that are really sensitive to the execution of business processes. StrAli-BAM consists of: a non functional requirement monitor and an infrastructure for SOA event-based execution and monitoring. This paper was performed following the research method of project science. The proposed approach is evaluated via a proof of concept in an online shopping scenario with non-functional response time requirement monitoring.

References

  1. Abbass Asosheh and Parvaneh Hajinazari. 2012. Towards improving enterprise performance with Service Level Agreements. In 6th Int. Symp. on Telecomm. IEEE, 913--918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Vitor Almeida Barros, Marcelo Fantinato, Guilherme MB Salles, and João Porto de Albuquerque. 2014. Deriving Service Level Agreements from Business Level Agreements-An Approach Towards Strategic Alignment in Organizations.. In 16th Int. Conf. on Ent. Inf. Sys. 214--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Konstantinos Bratanis, Dimitris Dranidis, and Anthony JH Simons. 2010. Towards run-time monitoring of business-level agreements for web services. In 5th South East Europ. Doct. Stud. Conf., Vol. 5. 370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Antonello Calabro, Francesca Lonetti, and Eda Marchetti. 2015. KPI evaluation of the business process execution through event monitoring activity. In 3rd Int. Conf. on Ent. Sys. IEEE, 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, Jan Mendling, Hajo A Reijers, et al. 2013. Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Thomas Erl. 2005. Service-Oriented Architecture - Concepts, Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall, p. 792. 792 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nihita Goel, NV Narendra Kumar, and RK Shyamasundar. 2011. SLA monitor: A system for dynamic monitoring of adaptive web services. In 9th IEEE Europ. Conf. on Web Serv. IEEE, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J.C. Henderson and N. Venkatraman. 1999. Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Sys. J. 38, 2 (1999), 472--484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lial Khaluf, Christian Gerth, and Gregor Engels. 2011. Pattern-based modeling and formalizing of business process quality constraints. In 23rd Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Sys. Eng. Springer, 521--535. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Maximilien Kintz, Monika Kochanowski, and Falko Koetter. 2017. Creating User-specific Business Process Monitoring Dashboards with a Model-driven Approach. In 5th Int. Conf. on Model-Driven Eng. and Soft. Devel. INSTICC, 353--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Falko Koetter and Monika Kochanowski. 2012. Goal-oriented model-driven business process monitoring using progoalml. In 33rd Int. Conf. on Inf. Sys. Springer, 72--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kala Kotamarthi, Xianzhi Wang, Georg Grossmann, Quan Z Sheng, and Sarath Indrakanti. 2015. A Framework Towards Model Driven Business Process Compliance and Monitoring. In 19th Int. Ent. Dist. Object Comp. Conf. Works. IEEE, 24--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tom Lubinski and CA Corte Madera. 2008. Business activity monitoring: Process control for the enterprise. Real Time Intel. & Complex Event Proc. 11 (2008), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Roger S Presman. 2011. Engenharia de Software: Uma abordagem Profissional (7 ed.). São Paulo: Makron Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Barros Salles, Fantinato and Albuquerque. 2018. Evaluation of the StrAli-BPM approach: Strategic alignment with BPM using agreements in different levels. Int. J. of Bus. Inf. Sys. 27, 4 (2018), 433--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Guilherme Salles, Marcelo Fantinato, Marislei Nishijima, and João Porto de Albuquerque. 2013. A contribution to organizational and operational strategic alignment: Incorporating business level agreements into business process modeling. In 10th Int. Conf. on Serv. Comp. IEEE, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ian Sommerville et al. 2007. Software engineering (9 ed.). Addison-wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. The Open Group. 2018. The ArchiMate Enterprise Architecture Modeling Language. http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/enterprise/archimate-overview.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolfgang Theilmann, Ulrich Winkler, Jens Happe, and Ildefons Magrans de Abril. 2010. Managing On-Demand Business Applications with Hierarchical Service Level Agreements.. In 3rd Fut. Int. Symp. Springer, 97--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R Hevner Von Alan, Salvatore T March, Jinsoo Park, and Sudha Ram. 2004. Design science in information systems research. Man. Inf. Sys. Quart. 28, 1 (2004), 75--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mathias Weske. 2012. Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures (2 ed.). Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Branimir Wetzstein, Philipp Leitner, Florian Rosenberg, Ivona Brandic, Schahram Dustdar, and Frank Leymann. 2009. Monitoring and analyzing influential factors of business process performance. In 13th IEEE Int. Ent. Dist. Obj. Comp. Conf. IEEE, 141--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Monitoring of Business Processes' non Functional Requirements based on Quality of Service

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SBSI '18: Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
        June 2018
        578 pages
        ISBN:9781450365598
        DOI:10.1145/3229345

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate181of557submissions,32%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader