skip to main content
10.1145/3617023.3617040acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the Limits of the Current Evaluation Metrics for Topic Modeling

Published:23 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Topic Modeling (TM) is a popular approach to extracting and organizing information from large amounts of textual data, by discovering and representing semantic topics from documents. In this paper, we investigate an important challenge in the TM context, namely Topic evaluation, responsible for driving the advances in the field and assessing the overall quality of the topic generation process. Traditional TM metrics capture the quality of topics by strictly evaluating the words that built the topics syntactically (i.e., NPMI, TF-IDF Coherence) or semantically (i.e., WEP). In here, we investigate whether we are approaching the limits of what the current evaluation metrics can assess regarding topic quality for TM. We performed a comprehensive experiment, considering three data collections widely used in automatic classification, for which each document’s topic (class) is known (i.e., ACM, 20News and WebKb). We contrast the quality of topics generated by four of the main TM techniques (i.e., LDA, NMF, CluWords and BerTopic) with the previous topic structure of each collection. Our results show that, despite the importance of the current metrics, they could not capture some important idiosyncratic aspects of TM, indicating the need to propose new metrics that consider, for example, the structure and organization of the documents that comprise the topics.

References

  1. 2023. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/ Accessed: 2023-05-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Saqib Aziz, Michael Dowling, Helmi Hammami, and Anke Piepenbrink. 2022. Machine learning in finance: A topic modeling approach. European Financial Management 28, 3 (2022), 744–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gerlof Bouma. 2009. Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. Proceedings of GSCL (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rob Churchill and Lisa Singh. 2022. The Evolution of Topic Modeling. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 10s, Article 215 (nov 2022), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3507900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Washington Cunha, Sérgio Canuto, Felipe Viegas, Thiago Salles, Christian Gomes, Vitor Mangaravite, Elaine Resende, Thierson Rosa, Marcos André Gonçalves, and Leonardo Rocha. 2020. Extended pre-processing pipeline for text classification: On the role of meta-feature representations, sparsification and selective sampling. Information Processing & Management 57, 4 (2020), 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Washington Cunha, Vítor Mangaravite, Christian Gomes, Sérgio Canuto, Elaine Resende, Cecilia Nascimento, Felipe Viegas, Celso França, Wellington Santos Martins, Jussara M. Almeida, Thierson Rosa, Leonardo Rocha, and Marcos André Gonçalves. 2021. On the cost-effectiveness of neural and non-neural approaches and representations for text classification: A comprehensive comparative study. Information Processing & Management 58, 3 (2021), 102481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arxiv:1810.04805 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Adji B. Dieng, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, and David M. Blei. 2019. Topic Modeling in Embedding Spaces. CoRR abs/1907.04907 (2019). arXiv:1907.04907http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04907Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maarten Grootendorst. 2022. BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Thomas Hofmann. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 50–57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Antônio Pereira De Souza Júnior, Pablo Cecilio, Felipe Viegas, Washington Cunha, Elisa Tuler De Albergaria, and Leonardo Chaves Dutra Da Rocha. 2022. Evaluating Topic Modeling Pre-Processing Pipelines for Portuguese Texts(WebMedia ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539637.3557052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung. 1999. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 6755 (1999), 788–791.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Leland McInnes, John Healy, and James Melville. 2020. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. arxiv:1802.03426 [stat.ML]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomas Mikolov, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, Christian Puhrsch, and Armand Joulin. 2018. Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Miyazaki, Japan. https://aclanthology.org/L18-1008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sergey Nikolenko, Sergei Koltsov, and Olessia Koltsova. 2015. Topic modelling for qualitative studies. Journal of Information Science 43 (12 2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515617393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sergey I Nikolenko. 2016. Topic quality metrics based on distributed word representations. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1029–1032.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Thomas Porturas and R. Andrew Taylor. 2021. Forty years of emergency medicine research: Uncovering research themes and trends through topic modeling. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 45 (2021), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Shahzad Qaiser and Ramsha Ali. 2018. Text Mining: Use of TF-IDF to Examine the Relevance of Words to Documents. International Journal of Computer Applications 181 (07 2018). https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018917395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. arxiv:1908.10084 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michael Röder, Andreas Both, and Alexander Hinneburg. 2015. Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 399–408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Priya Shrivastava and Dilip Kumar Sharma. 2021. Fake Content Identification Using Pre-Trained Glove-Embedding. In 2021 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON), Vol. 1. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON52037.2021.9702379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alper Kursat Uysal and Serkan Gunal. 2014. The impact of preprocessing on text classification. Information Processing & Management 50, 1 (2014), 04 – 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.08.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Felipe Viegas, Sérgio Canuto, Christian Gomes, Washington Luiz, Thierson Rosa, Sabir Ribas, Leonardo Rocha, and Marcos André Gonçalves. 2019. CluWords: exploiting semantic word clustering representation for enhanced topic modeling. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 753–761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Felipe Viegas, Washington Cunha, Christian Gomes, Antônio Pereira, Leonardo Rocha, and Marcos Goncalves. 2020. CluHTM - Semantic Hierarchical Topic Modeling based on CluWords. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 8138–8150. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Felipe Viegas, Antônio Pereira, Pablo Cecílio, Elisa Tuler, Wagner Meira Jr, Marcos Gonçalves, and Leonardo Rocha. 2022. Semantic Academic Profiler (SAP): a framework for researcher assessment based on semantic topic modeling. Scientometrics 127, 8 (2022), 5005–5026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S Vijayarani, Ms J Ilamathi, and Ms Nithya. 2015. Preprocessing techniques for text mining-an overview. International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks 5, 1, 7–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the Limits of the Current Evaluation Metrics for Topic Modeling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WebMedia '23: Proceedings of the 29th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
      October 2023
      285 pages
      ISBN:9798400709081
      DOI:10.1145/3617023

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format