skip to main content
10.1145/3243082.3243107acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Investigation of User Actions and Experiences when Exposed to YouTube Video Ads

Published:16 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Advertisements using video content (video ads) are currently one of the leading forms of revenue on today's Internet. Within this setting, we present the first study that sheds some light on understanding why individual users view or decide to skip video ads. Unlike previous related efforts, which looked into aggregated sets of data and did not address the users' actions and experiences when exposed to video ads, we here perform a user experience focused investigation employing surveys and diaries with a set of real YouTube viewers. Our study is driven by the following research question: How does the user experience, when exposed to video ads, affect the user actions (decision to skip or watch an ad)?

References

  1. Maria Carpen Amarie, Ioannis Pefkianakis, and Henrik Lundgren. 2014. Mobile Video Ad Caching on Smartphones. In Proc. Ubicomp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Maria Carpen Amarie, Ioannis Pefkianakis, and Henrik Lundgren. 2014. Towards Understanding Mobile Video Ads. In Proc. HotMobile.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mariana Arantes, Flavio Figueiredo, and Jussara M Almeida. 2016. Understanding video-ad consumption on YouTube: A measurement study on user behavior, popularity, and content properties. In Proc. Web Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yoram Bachrach, Sofia Ceppi, Ian A Kash, Peter Key, and Mohammad Reza Khani. 2016. Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nicola Barbieri, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Mounia Lalmas. 2016. Improving Post-Click User Engagement on Native Ads via Survival Analysis. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Russell W Belk. 2017. Qualitative Research in Advertising. Journal of Advertising (2017), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies. In Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jilin Chen, Eben M Haber, Ruogu Kang, Gary Hsieh, and Jalal Mahmud. 2015. Making Use of Derived Personality: The Case of Social Media Ad Targeting. In Proc. ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Henriette Cramer. 2015. Effects of ad quality & content-relevance on perceived content quality. In Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John W Creswell. 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank E Dardis, Mike Schmierbach, Brett Sherrick, Frank Waddell, Jose Aviles, Sushma Kumble, and Erica Bailey. 2016. Adver-Where? Comparing the Effectiveness of Banner Ads and Video Ads in Online Video Games. Journal of Interactive Advertising 16, 2 (2016), 87--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Arpita Ghosh, Mohammad Mahdian, R. Preston McAfee, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. 2015. To Match or Not to Match: Economics of Cookie Matching in Online Advertising. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation 3, 2 (April 2015), 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Phillipa Gill, Vijay Erramilli, Augustin Chaintreau, Balachander Krishnamurthy, Konstantina Papagiannaki, and Pablo Rodriguez. 2013. Follow the Money: Understanding Economics of Online Aggregation and Advertising. In Proc. IMC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Helena C Kraemer. 1982. Kappa coefficient. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Shunmuga Krishnan and Ramesh K. Sitaraman. 2013. Understanding the Effectiveness of Video Ads: A Measurement Study. In Proc. IMC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Anísio Lacerda, Marco Cristo, Marcos André Gonçalves, Weiguo Fan, Nivio Ziviani, and Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. 2006. Learning to advertise. In Proc. SIGIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research methods in human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hao Li and Hui-Yi Lo. 2015. Do you recognize its brand? The effectiveness of online in-stream video advertisements. Journal of Advertising 44, 3 (2015), 208--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Matthew Malloy, Mark McNamara, Aaron Cahn, and Paul Barford. 2016. Ad Blockers: Global Prevalence and Impact. In Proc. IMC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Andrew McStay. 2010. A Qualitative Approach to Understanding Audience's Perceptions of Creativity in Online Advertising. The Qualitative Report 15, 1 (2010), 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Katie O'Donnell and Henriette Cramer. 2015. People's Perceptions of Personalized Ads. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jaimie Yejean Park, Yunkyu Sohn, and Sue Moon. 2016. Power of Earned Advertising on Social Network Services: A Case Study of Friend Tagging on Facebook. In Proc. ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Enric Pujol, Oliver Hohlfeld, and Anja Feldmann. 2015. Annoyed users: Ads and ad-block usage in the wild. In Proc. IMC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fabian Schneider, Anja Feldmann, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Walter Willinger. 2009. Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective. In Proc. IMC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Variety. 2014. YouTube U.S. Video-Ad Revenue Will Top $1 Billion in 2014: Report. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ke Zhou, Miriam Redi, Andrew Haines, and Mounia Lalmas. 2016. Predicting pre-click quality for native advertisements. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Investigation of User Actions and Experiences when Exposed to YouTube Video Ads

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WebMedia '18: Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
      October 2018
      437 pages
      ISBN:9781450358675
      DOI:10.1145/3243082

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      WebMedia '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of111submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader