skip to main content
10.1145/3243082.3264664acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A new approach to identifying the potentialities of User Experience techniques

Published:16 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, there are a lot of techniques to evaluate the hedonic experiences of users with the use of technological products. The main problem is that, the fact that these techniques use different denominations for each type of feeling they can collect, make hard for evaluators to identify what exactly each technique can evaluate. Moreover, it is important to know the potential of each feeling, so the evaluators can choose the most appropriate technique for each type of evaluation. looking on that way, this article presents a new approach to identify the feelings that each User eXperience (UX) technique manages to encompass and what its potentialities are. The results of the study are promising, having as a legacy the description of the approach and the results of the evaluation of five UX techniques based on a self-report questionnaire.

References

  1. Margaret M. Bradley and Peter J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Pieter Desmet. 2000. Emotion through expression; designing mobile telephones with an emotional fit. Report of Modeling the Evaluation Structure of KANSEI 3 (2000), 103--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pieter Desmet. 2005. Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products. In Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Mark A. Blythe, Kees Overbeeke, Andrew F. Monk, and Peter C. Wright (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 111--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Marc Hassenzahl, Annika Wiklund-Engblom, Anette Bengs, Susanne Hägglund, and Sarah Diefenbach. 2015. Experience-Oriented and Product-Oriented Evaluation: Psychological Need Fulfillment, Positive Affect, and Product Perception. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 8 (2015), 530--544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. The Experience Sampling Method. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 21--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Camila Loiola Brito Maia and Elizabeth S. Furtado. 2016. A Study About Psychophysiological Measures in User Experience Monitoring and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 9 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Luis Rivero and Tayana Conte. 2017. A Systematic Mapping Study on Research Contributions on UX Evaluation Technologies. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. James A. Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6 (1980), 1161--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. James A. Russell, Anna Weiss, and Gerald A. Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 3 (1989), 493--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hanna Stelmaszewska and Bob Fields. 2004. Conceptualising user hedonic experience, In Proceedings of ECCE-12 -- Living and Working with Technology. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 12, 12--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gloria Willcox. 1982. The Feeling Wheel. Transactional Analysis Journal 12, 4 (oct 1982), 274--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A new approach to identifying the potentialities of User Experience techniques

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WebMedia '18: Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
          October 2018
          437 pages
          ISBN:9781450358675
          DOI:10.1145/3243082

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 October 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          WebMedia '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of111submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader