skip to main content
10.1145/3126858.3131568acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Adaptive Sensing Relevance Exploiting Social Media Mining in Smart Cities

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless sensor networks are an important part of smart cities, but there are still many challenging issues, demanding optimizations in those networks for higher efficiency. Events of interest may be identified analyzing data posted in social media, and such events may be used to assign priority levels to sensor nodes. This paper proposes an automatic mechanism to update sensors' priorities based on events mined and identified in social medias, which may be then optimized for higher monitoring efficiency.

References

  1. Hamed Abdelhaq, Christian Sengstock, and Michael Gertz . 2013. Eventweet: Online localized event detection from twitter. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (2013), 1326--1329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Charu C Aggarwal . 2011. An introduction to social network data analytics. Social network data analytics. 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Farzindar Atefeh and Wael Khreich . 2015. A survey of techniques for event detection in twitter. Computational Intelligence (2015), 132--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nick Bostrom . 2013. Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy (2013), 15--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. G. Costa, M. Collotta, G. Pau, and C. Duran-Faundez . 2017. A Fuzzy-Based Approach for Sensing, Coding and Transmission Configuration of Visual Sensors in Smart City Applications. Sensors (2017), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Daniel G Costa and Luiz Affonso Guedes . 2013. Exploiting the sensing relevancies of source nodes for optimizations in visual sensor networks. Multimedia tools and applications (2013), 549--579.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniel G Costa, Luiz Affonso Guedes, Francisco Vasques, and Paulo Portugal . 2013. Adaptive monitoring relevance in camera networks for critical surveillance applications. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks Vol. 2013 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pedro Domingos . 2005. Mining social networks for viral marketing. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2005), 80--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Konstantinos P Ferentinos and Theodore A Tsiligiridis . 2007. Adaptive design optimization of wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithms. Computer Networks (2007), 1031--1051.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryong Lee and Kazutoshi Sumiya . 2010. Measuring geographical regularities of crowd behaviors for Twitter-based geo-social event detection. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on location based social networks. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rui Li, Kin Hou Lei, Ravi Khadiwala, and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang . 2012. Tedas: A twitter-based event detection and analysis system 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering. 1273--1276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Michael J Paul and Mark Dredze . 2011. You are what you Tweet: Analyzing Twitter for public health. ICWSM (2011), 265--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Charith Perera, Arkady Zaslavsky, Peter Christen, and Dimitrios Georgakopoulos . 2014. Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, Vol. 25, 1 (2014), 81--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo . 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. 851--860.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jianshu Weng and Bu-Sung Lee . 2011. Event Detection in Twitter. ICWSM (2011), 401--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chao Zhang, Guangyu Zhou, Quan Yuan, Honglei Zhuang, Yu Zheng, Lance Kaplan, Shaowen Wang, and Jiawei Han . 2016. GeoBurst: Real-Time Local Event Detection in Geo-Tagged Tweet Streams Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 513--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Siqi Zhao, Lin Zhong, Jehan Wickramasuriya, and Venu Vasudevan . 2011. Human as real-time sensors of social and physical events: A case study of twitter and sports games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.4300 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive Sensing Relevance Exploiting Social Media Mining in Smart Cities

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WebMedia '17: Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
          October 2017
          522 pages
          ISBN:9781450350969
          DOI:10.1145/3126858

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 17 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          WebMedia '17 Paper Acceptance Rate38of138submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader