skip to main content
10.1145/2382636.2382676acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Leveraging relationships in social networks for sentiment analysis

Published:15 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of online social networks in the past few years has generated an enormous amount of valuable data containing user opinions and experiences about the most varied subjects. Aiming to identify the orientation of user postings, several sentiment analysis techniques have been proposed - mainly based on text analysis. We propose here a different perspective to treat this problem, based on a user centric approach. We adopt a graph representation in which nodes represent users and connections represent their relationships in social networks. When available, the user opinion orientation is used to tag the user node. Then, we apply link mining techniques to infer opinions of users who have not posted their opinion about the subject under analysis. Preliminary experiments on a Twitter corpus of political preferences have shown promising results.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R. and Xu, Y. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 529--535, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amiri, H. and Chua, T. Mining slang and urban opinion words and phrases from cQA services: an optimization approach. In 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. pp. 193--202. New York, NY, USA. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bollen, J., Goncalves, B., Ruan, G., Mao, H. Happiness is assortative in online social networks. Artificial Life 17(3), pp. 237--251. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. pp. 210--230. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brin, S. and Page, L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30: 107--117. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L., Silva, M. J., Oliveira, E. Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh...!! it's "so easy" ;-). In 1st international ACM CIKM workshop on Topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion. New York, NY, USA. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., Indyk, P. Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. In ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 307--318, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Councill, I. G., McDonald, R., Velikovich, L. What's great and what's not: learning to classify the scope of negation for improved sentiment analysis. In ACM Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg, PA, USA. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ding, X., Liu, B. and Yu, P. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (WSDM), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ganapathibhotla, M. and Liu, B. Mining Opinions in Comparative Sentences. In 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 241--248, Manchester, August 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Geman, S. and Geman, D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 6:721--741, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Getoor, L. and Diehl, C. P. Link mining: a survey. ACM SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 7, issue 2. December 2005. New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Go, A., Bhayani, R. and Huang, L. Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg, A. B. and Zhu, X. Seeing stars when there aren't many stars: Graph-based semi-supervised learning for sentiment categorization. In TextGraphs: HLT/NAACL Workshop on Graph-based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hu, M. and Liu, B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 168--177, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jensen, D., Neville, J. and Gallagher, B. Why collective inference improves relational classification. In 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 593--598), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kleinberg, J. and Tardos, E. Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships: Metric labeling and Markov random fields. Journal of the ACM, vol. 49, pp. 616--639, ISSN 0004--5411, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koppel, M. and Schler, J. The importance of neutral examples for learning sentiment. In Workshop on the Analysis of Informal and Formal Information Exchange During Negotiations (FINEXIN), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Macskassy, S. A., Provost, F. NetKit-SRL: a toolkit for network learning and inference. In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS) Conference, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Macskassy, S. A. and Provost, F. Classification in Networked Data: A Toolkit and a Univariate Case Study. In Journal of Machine Learning Research. vol. 8, pp. 935--983. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mao, Y. and Lebanon, G. Isotonic conditional random fields and local sentiment flow. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27:415--444, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Melville, P., Mooney, R. J. and Nagarajan, R. Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations. In Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2002), pp. 187--192, Edmonton, Canada, July 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mislove , A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel P., Bhattacharjee, B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In IMC'07 (San Diego, California, USA. October, 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Missen, M.M.S., Boughanem, M., Cabanac, G. Challenges for Sentence Level Opinion Detection in Blogs. In 8th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science. pp. 347--351. June 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Morinaga, S., Yamanishi, K., Tateishi, K. and Fukushima, T. Mining product reputations on the web. In ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 341--349, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mullen, T., Malouf, R. A Preliminary Investigation into Sentiment Analysis of Informal Political Discourse. In AAAI-2006 Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mullen, T. and Malouf, R. Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research, vol. 18, pp. 177--190, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Narayanan, R., Liu, B. and Choudhary, A. Sentiment analysis of conditional sentences. In 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Vol. 1, pp. 180--189. Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Pang, B. and Lee, L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 2, n. 1--2, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pang, B., Lee, L. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 271--278, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pang, B. and Lee, L. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 115--124, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Popescu, A. and Etzioni, O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Shivashankar, S. and Ravindran, B. Multi grain sentiment analysis using collective classification. In 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Shiy, L., Zhaoy, Y. and Tang, J. Combining link and content for collective active learning. In Proceedings of CIKM'10, Oct, 2010. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Snyder, B. and Barzilay, R. Multiple aspect ranking using the Good Grief algorithm. In Proceedings of the Joint Human Language Technology/North American Chapter of the ACL Conference (HLT-NAACL), pp. 300--307, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Taskar, B., Segal, E. and Koller, D. Probabilistic classification and clustering in relational data. In 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 870--878), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Leveraging relationships in social networks for sentiment analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WebMedia '12: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian symposium on Multimedia and the web
        October 2012
        426 pages
        ISBN:9781450317061
        DOI:10.1145/2382636

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader