skip to main content
10.1145/3323503.3360637acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A model for productivity and soil fertility prediction oriented to ubiquitous agriculture

Published:29 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Currently the advances in precision agriculture technologies expand into the area of ubiquotous computing, with sophisticated sensors to measure soil composition and plant needs. The goal is to make farming more efficient and productive with the least impact on the environment. This paper proposes an architectural model for evaluation of soil fertility and productivity using contexts history based on chemical and physical aspects that characterize different types of soil over the time in a sustainable way. The prediction of productivity by wheat planted area used as physical aspects the climatic events between the years of 2001 and 2015. The results achieved a mean square error of calibration (RMSE) of 0.24 T/ha, mean square erros of cross-validation of 0.46 T/ha with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.8725. For the prediction of organic matter and clay, the best results obtained were a R2 of 0.9584, RMSECV of 0.47% and R2 of 0.9180, RMSECV of 7.64%, respectively.

References

  1. Nídia Raquel Costa, Morel de Passos e Carvalho, Edjair Augusto Dal Bem, Flávio Carlos Dalchiavon, and Rudgen Rodrigues Caldas. 2014. Produtividade de laranja correlacionada com atributos químicos do solo visando a zonas específicas de manejo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 44, 4 (dec 2014), 391--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marcia Miguel Castro Ferreira. 2015. Quimiometria: conceitos, métodos e aplicações. Editora da Unicamp, Campinas-SP. 493 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. E. Furtini Neto, F. R. Vale, A. V. Resende, L. R. G. Guilherme, and G. A. A. Guedes. 2001. Fertilidade do solo (1 ed.). UFLA/FAEPE, Lavras. 261 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amarendra Goap, Deepak Sharma, A.K. Shukla, and C. Rama Krishna. 2018. An IoT based smart irrigation management system using Machine learning and open source technologies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 155 (dec 2018), 41--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Truong Thu Huong, Nguyen Huu Thanh, Nguyen Thi Van, Nguyen Tien Dat, Nguyen Van Long, and Alan J. Marshall. 2018. Water and Energy-Efficient Irrigation based on Markov Decision Model for Precision Agriculture. In 2018 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE). 51--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Juan D. Muñoz and Alexandra Kravchenko. 2011. Soil carbon mapping using on-the-go near infrared spectroscopy, topography and aerial photographs. Geoderma 166, 1 (2011), 102--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Nawar and A.M. Mouazen. 2019. On-line vis-NIR spectroscopy prediction of soil organic carbon using machine learning. Soil and Tillage Research 190 (2019), 120 -- 127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. João H. Rosa, Jorge L. V. Barbosa, Marcos Kich, and Lucas Brito. 2015. A Multi-Temporal Context-aware System for Competences Management. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 25, 4 (dec 2015), 455--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mario Schmitz, Daniel Martini, Martin Kunisch, and Hans-Jürgen Mösinger. 2009. agroXML Enabling Standardized, Platform-Independent Internet Data Exchange in Farm Management Information Systems. In Metadata and Semantics. Springer US, Boston, MA, 463--468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rodrigo Santos de Souza, João Ladislau Barbará Lopes, Claudio Fernando Resin Geyer, Ana Marilza Pernas Fleischmann, Adenauer Correa Yamin, and Gizele Ingrid Gadotti. 2014. A Contribution to the Sensor Network Management for Context Awareness in Ubicomp. In Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 223--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jerome Treboux and Dominique Genoud. 2018. Improved Machine Learning Methodology for High Precision Agriculture. In 2018 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Wetterlind, K. Piikki, B. Stenberg, and M. Söderström. 2015. Exploring the predictability of soil texture and organic matter content with a commercial integrated soil profiling tool. European Journal of Soil Science 66, 4 (jul 2015), 631--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Aleksandra Wolanin, Gustau Camps-Valls, Luis Gómez-Chova, Gonzalo Mateo-García, Christiaan van der Tol, Yongguang Zhang, and Luis Guanter. 2019. Estimating crop primary productivity with Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 using machine learning methods trained with radiative transfer simulations. Remote Sensing of Environment 225 (2019), 441 -- 457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A model for productivity and soil fertility prediction oriented to ubiquitous agriculture

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WebMedia '19: Proceedings of the 25th Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
          October 2019
          537 pages
          ISBN:9781450367639
          DOI:10.1145/3323503

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 October 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader