skip to main content
10.1145/3323503.3349560acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Popularity-based top-k spatial-keyword preference query

Published:29 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Applications based on spatial data has become present in our daily lives. Spatial data can be used to represent objects such as roads, bus stops, restaurants and schools. Some of these objects maybe associated with a text (e.g. menu of a restaurant). The objects that have spatial location (latitude and longitude) and text are named spatio-textual objects. There are a large number of interesting spatio-textual queries that can be posed. For example, a tourist maybe interested in hotels (spatial objects) that have a lot of restaurants in its vicinity. In this paper, we propose a new query type named Popularity-based Top-k Spatial-keyword Preference Query. Giving a set of query keywords and a spatial vicinity of interest; this query returns the k best spatial objects of interest in terms of the number (popularity) of spatio-textual objects of reference in their vicinity that are textually relevant for the given query keywords. We propose new algorithms to process this query efficiently and evaluate the algorithms proposed in real datasets. The results show the efficiency of spatial-based algorithms for radius bellow 5km and the efficiency of algorithms with hybrid indexes (spatio-textual indexes) for the majority of the experiments.

References

  1. Lars Arge, Mark De Berg, Herman Haverkort, and Ke Yi. 2008. The priority R-tree: A practically efficient and worst-case optimal R-tree. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) 4, 1--12 (2008), 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Norbert Beckmann, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Ralf Schneider, and Bernhard Seeger. 1990. The R*-tree: An Efficient and Robust Access Method for Points and Rectangles. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 322--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lisi Chen, Gao Cong, Christian S Jensen, and Dingming Wu. 2013. Spatial keyword query processing: an experimental evaluation. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 6, 3 (2013), 217--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, and Clifford Stein. 2009. Introduction to Algorithms, Third Edition (3rd ed.). The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. João Paulo Dias de Almeida and Frederico Araújo Durão. 2018. Improving the Spatial Keyword Preference Query with Linked Open Data. In Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia). 19--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. João Paulo Dias de Almeida and João B Rocha-Junior. 2016. Top-k spatial keyword preference query. Journal of Information and Data Management (JIDM) 6, 3 (2016), 162--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang Du, Donghui Zhang, and Tian Xia. 2005. The optimal-location query. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD). Springer, 163--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yunpeng Gao, Yao Wang, and Shengwei Yi. 2016. Preference-aware top-k spatiotextual queries. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM). 186--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Man Lung Yiu, Hua Lu, Nikos Mamoulis, and Michail Vaitis. 2011. Ranking Spatial Data by Quality Preferences. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE) 23 (2011), 433 -- 446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. João B. Rocha-Junior, Orestis Gkorgkas, Simon Jonassen, and Kjetil Nørvåg. 2011. Efficient Processing of Top-k Spatial Keyword Queries. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD). 205--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. João B. Rocha-Junior, Akrivi Vlachou, Christos Doulkeridis, and Kjetil Nørvåg. 2010. Efficient processing of top-k spatial preference queries. Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB) 4, 2 (2010), 93--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Roger W Sinnott. 1984. Virtues of the Haversine. Sky and Telescope 68 (1984), 159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cláudio Moisés Valiense de Andrade and João B. Rocha-Junior. 2018. Encontrando os locais de interesse com maior popularidade a partir do critério espacial e textual. Revista de Sistemas e Computação-RSC 8, 2 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cláudio Moisés Valiense de Andrade and João B. Rocha-Junior. 2018. Encontrando os melhores locais a partir da popularidade de objetos de interesse na vizinhança espacial: uma proposta. Workshop de Trabalhos de Pós-Graduação (WPOS) da XVIII Escola Regional de Computação Bahia - Alagoas - Sergipe, Aracaju, Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Man Lung Yiu, Xiangyuan Dai, Nikos Mamoulis, and Michail Vaitis. 2007. Top-k spatial preference queries. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). 1076--1085.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Donghui Zhang, Yang Du, Tian Xia, and Yufei Tao. 2006. Progressive computation of the min-dist optimal-location query. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB). 643--654.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kai Zheng, Han Su, Bolong Zheng, Shuo Shang, Jiajie Xu, Jiajun Liu, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2015. Interactive top-k spatial keyword queries. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). 423--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Justin Zobel and Alistair Moffat. 2006. Inverted files for text search engines. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 38, 2 (2006), 1--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Popularity-based top-k spatial-keyword preference query

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WebMedia '19: Proceedings of the 25th Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
      October 2019
      537 pages
      ISBN:9781450367639
      DOI:10.1145/3323503

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader