An exploratory analysis of Computing Ethics practices and instruction through Brazilian cyberspace

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2022.2604

Keywords:

Ethical Decision-Making, computing ethics, Cyberculture, computing ethics Instruction

Abstract

The heterogeneity and plurality of actors and the possible issues that influence Ethical Decision-Making (EDM) make EDM a multi-faceted phenomenon. This research aims to (i) investigate the training or instructional path in ethics or computing ethics, and (ii) investigate these phenomena from ethics of resistance disruptive, critical, and innovative perspective. The simplification and reduction of the holistic panorama partially explain that empirical research on this topic has failed to generate cumulative results. Therefore, we collect and analyze four hundred and thirty-four responses from a questionnaire, mostly from computer experts associated with their instruction on ethics and “immoral” or “unethical” practices that they have been involved in, directly or indirectly. Based on the results obtained, the main contribution is an interpretive and exploratory computing ethics/ethics discussion about instruction and the morality of practices through cyberspace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alakavuklar, O. and Alamgir, F. (2018). Ethics of resistance in organisations: A conceptual proposal. J. Bus. Ethics, 149:31–43.

Alisson, E. (2022). Desigualdade social volta a crescer no Brasil. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Baase, S. and Henry, T. M. (2017). Gift of Fire, A: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing Technology. Pearson, New York, NY, 5 edition.

Babbie, E. (2021). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). General features of complex systems. EOLSS - UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems.

Barcaro, E. and Freire, E. (2009). A importância da disciplina Ética no curso de informática. Fasci-Tech, 01(01):17–28.

Barger, R. (2008). Computer Ethics: A Case-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, RU.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM FAccT, FAccT ’21, pages 610––623. ACM.

Bietti, E. (2020). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: A view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* ’20, page 210–219, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Blundell, B. G. (2021). Ethics in Computing, Science, and Engineering: A Student’s Guide to Doing Things Right. Springer, New York, NY.

Bohr, R. H. and Kaplan, H. M. (1971). Employee protest and social change in the health care organization. Am. j. of pub. health, 61(11):2229–2235.

Brasil (2016). Conselho Nacional da Saúde. RESOLUÇÃO Nº 510, DE 07 DE ABRIL DE 2016. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Brasil (2018). LEI Nº 13.709, DE 14 DE AGOSTO DE 2018. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Friedler, S. A. and Wilson, C., editors, Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, volume 81, pages 77–91, New York, NY, USA. PMLR.

Buston, K., Parry-Jones, W., Livingston, M., Bogan, A., and Wood, S. (1991). Qualitative research. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 172:197–199.

Carvalho, L. P., Oliveira, J., and Santoro, F. (2020). Who watches you? an allegory of dataveillance and cyberstalking. In Anais do I WICS, pages 85–96, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.

Carvalho, L. P., Oliveira, J., and Santoro, F. M. (2021). A presenÇa de conteÚdos sobre Ética computacional na literacia em computaÇÃo institucional brasileira. In ABCiber Virtual Meeting Proceedings. ABCiber Virtual Meeting 2021.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE, 2 edition.

Christians, C. G. (2007). Neutral science and the ethics of resistance. In Denzin, N. K. and Giardina, M. D., editors, Ethical Futures in Qualitative Research. Routledge. Routledge.

CNS (2012). ResoluÇÃo nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012.

Corbin, J. M. and Strauss, A. C. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE, 4 edition.

Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc., 5 edition.

Dall’ara, J. (2022). Alto consumo de pirataria é favorecido pela desigualdade econômica no País. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Dexter, S., Buchanan, E., Dins, K., Fleischmann, K. R., and Miller, K. (2013). Characterizing the need for graduate ethics education. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’13, page 153–158, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Eriksen, K. (2021). WHY DISNEY+ IS RIGHT TO CHARGE EXTRA FOR ‘RAYA’. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Fernández Pinto, M. (2020). Open science for private interests? how the logic of open science contributes to the commercialization of research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5.

Ferraz, C. A. (2014). Ética Elementos Básicos. NEPFIL online, Pelotas, RS.

Gibson, K. (2014). An Introduction to Ethics. PEARSON, Nova Jérsey.

Gotterbarn, D. (2010). THINKING PROFESSIONALLY Why Bother with Ethics in Computing: Addressing Harmful Paradigms? ACM Inroads, 1(1):9–10.

Gotterbarn, D., Wolf, M. J., Flick, C., and Miller, K. (2018). THINKING PROFESSIONALLY The Continual Evolution of Interest in Computing Ethics. ACM Inroads, 9(2):10–12.

Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MISQ, 30(3):611–642.

Grohmann, R. (2021). Os laboratórios do trabalho digital. Boitempo Editorial, São Paulo, SP.

Habermas, J. (1997). Direito e Democracia, entre facticidade e validade, volume 2. Tempo Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.

Hall, B. R. (2014). A synthesized definition of computer ethics. SIGCAS Comput. Soc., 44(3):21–35.

Hasselbalch, G. (2021). Data Ethics of Power. A Human Approach in the Big Data and AI Era. Edward Elgar Publishig, Camberley Surrey, UK.

Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2).

Johnson, D. (1994). Who should teach computer ethics and computers society? SIGCAS Comput. Soc., 24(2):6–13.

Johnson, D. (2008). Computer Ethics. Pearson, 4 edition.

Klikauer, T. (2014). Social justice and the ethics of resistance: A review essay. Soc Just Res, 27:518––525.

Laudon, K. and Laudon, J. (2020). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson, New York, NY, 16 edition.

Libâneo, J. C. (2018). Didática. Cortez, São Paulo, SP, 2 edition.

Libâneo, J. C. and Alves, N. (2018). Temas de pedagogia: diálogos entre didática e currículo. Cortez, São Paulo, SP, 1 edition.

Lisboa, L., Ferro, J. V., Brito, J. R., and Lopes, R. (2020). A disseminação da desinformação promovida por líderes estatais na pandemia da COVID-19. In Anais do I WICS, pages 114–121, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.

Luca Casali, G. and Perano, M. (2020). Forty years of research on factors influencing ethical decision making: Establishing a future research agenda. Journal of Bus. Res.

Lucchese, B., Freire, F., and Leitão, L. (2022). ‘Acho que tive uma alucinação’, disse uma das pacientes de anestesista preso por estupro durante parto. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Lévy, P. (2001). Cyberculture. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

Manjikian, M. (2017). Cybersecurity Ethics: An Introduction. Routledge, New York, NY.

Marcondes, D. (2007). Textos básicos de ética: De Platão a Foucault. Zahar, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.

Marple, H. (2018). Parasite, Pirate, and Robin Hood: Sci-Hub Is Disrupting the World of Academic Publishing. The I Journal: Student Journal of the Faculty of Information, 3(2).

Masiero, P. C. (2013). Ética em Computação. EDUSP, São Paulo, SP.

Moor, J. H. (2005). Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics Inf Technol, 7:111–119.

Morwitz, V. G. (2005). The effect of survey measurement on respondent behaviour. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21(4-5):451–455.

Nagima, I. M. S. and Haiduk, B. (2015). A aplicação do princípio da adequação social e a venda de produtos piratas. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson, New York, NY.

Oliveira, F. (2020). Por melhores condições, entregadores protestam em SP, RJ e outros estados. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Pignati, G. (2022). Brasil é um dos países que mais consome pirataria no mundo. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Recker, J. (2021). Scientific research in information systems: a beginner’s guide. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2 edition.

Reynolds, G. (2019). Ethics in Information Technology. CENGAGE, Independence, KY, 6 edition.

Ribeiro, K. S. F. M., Maciel, C., and S. Bim, M. A. (2020). Gênero e tecnologias. In Maciel, C. and Viterbo, J., editors, Computação e sociedade: a profissão - volume 1, pages 104–140. EdUFMT Digital, Mato Grosso, Brasil.

Rigueiras, S. (2020). Estudantes fazem formatura em Minecraft com discurso, prêmios e convidados. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Rudy-Hiller, F. (2018). The Epistemic Condition for Moral Responsibility. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2018 edition. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Santoro, F. M. and Costa, R. M. E. M. d. (2021). Towards ethics in information systems. Journal on Interactive Systems, 12(1):69–82.

Santos, C. C. (2022). “Tem Gente que Nem Entende o que a Gente Está Fazendo, Ainda”: A Emergência do Ativismo Digital Antirracista no Brasil. Master’s thesis, UFRJ/ COPPE/ Programa de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.

Sasse, C. (2021). Recordista em desigualdade, país estuda alternativas para ajudar os mais pobres. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Schaefer, S. (2020). Why Mulan Is So Expensive On Disney+. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Silva, T. (2020). Comunidades, algoritmos e ativismos digitais: Olhares afrodiaspóricos. LiteraRUA, São Paulo, SP.

Silveira, S. A. (2020). Responsabilidade algorítmica, personalidade eletrônica e democracia. Eptic, 22(2).

Singer, P. (2022). Ethics. Encyclopedia Britannica. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Sklair, L. (2012). Culture-Ideology of Consumerism. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Smith, R. (2006). The highly profitable but unethical business of publishing medical research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(9):452–456. PMID: 16946388.

Sovacool, B. (2014). Energy studies need social science. Nature, 511(7511):529–530.

Spiekermann, S., Krasnova, H., Hinz, O., Baumann, A., Benlian, A., Gimpel, H., Heimbach, I., Köster, A., Maedche, A., Niehaves, B., Risius, M., and Trenz, M. (2022). Values and ethics in information systems. Business Information Systems Engineering.

Spinello, R. A. (2020). Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Burlington, MA, 7 edition.

Sposito, C. (2011). O ensino da ética em cursos de computação : normativo ou dialógico? Master’s thesis, UFMT, Instituto de Educação, Mato Grosso, MT.

Stair, R. M. and Reynolds, G. W. (2018). Principles of Information Systems. CENGAGE Learning, Boston, MA, 13 edition.

Torres, M. (1998). Ethical decision-making models. [link] [accessed 09-09-2022].

Vázquez, A. S. (2018). Ética. Civilização Brasileira, 39th edition.

Walter, P. and Mullins, D. (2019). From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing. Molecular biology of the cell, 30(20):2537–2542.

Zagzebski, L. (2017). Exemplarist Moral Theory. Oxford University Press, Nova Iorque, NI.

Ziman, J. (2001). Getting scientists to think about what they are doing. Science and engineering ethics, 7:165–76.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-01

How to Cite

CARVALHO, L. P.; SANTORO, F. M.; OLIVEIRA, J. An exploratory analysis of Computing Ethics practices and instruction through Brazilian cyberspace. Journal on Interactive Systems, Porto Alegre, RS, v. 13, n. 1, p. 274–300, 2022. DOI: 10.5753/jis.2022.2604. Disponível em: https://sol.sbc.org.br/journals/index.php/jis/article/view/2604. Acesso em: 6 feb. 2023.

Issue

Section

Regular Paper