Um estudo sobre a relação entre os elementos de jogos e os tipos de usuários de sistemas gamificados

Resumo


Neste trabalho em progresso está sendo realizado um estudo sobre quais elementos de jogos mais motivam e atraem os diferentes tipos de usuários de sistemas gamificados, bem como quais são as tendências e interesses típicos dos usuários de cada tipo. O modelo HEXAD será adotado para classificar os usuários em seis tipos distintos. Para realizar esse estudo, serão empregados o juiz on-line CodeBench e a plataforma de gamificação CodePlay, onde os alunos precisam completar os exercícios de programação disponibilizados pelos professores para avançar nas fases do sistema gamificado.

Link para o vídeo da apresentação: https://youtu.be/P9Y218F_9OA

Palavras-chave: tipos de usuário, gamificação, jogo

Referências

Brian J Arnold. 2014. Gamification in education.Proceedings of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences21, 1 (2014), 32–39.

Richard Bartle. 1996. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD research1, 1 (1996), 19.

Felipe Cechella, Gardênia Abbad, and Ralf Wagner. 2021. Leveraging learning with gamification: An experimental case study with bank managers. Computers in Human Behavior Reports3 (2021), 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100044

Lamya F Daghestani, Lamiaa F Ibrahim, Reem S Al-Towirgi, and Hesham A Salman. 2020. Adapting gamified learning systems using educational data mining techniques. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 28, 3 (2020), 568–589.

Leandro Galvão, David Fernandes, and Bruno Gadelha. 2016. Juiz online como ferramenta de apoio a uma metodologia de ensino híbrido em programação. In Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (SBIE), Vol. 27. 140.

Muhammad Awais Hassan, Ume Habiba, Fiaz Majeed, and Muhammad Shoaib.2019. Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments (2019), 1–21.

Yuan Jia, Bin Xu, Yamini Karanam, and Stephen Voida. 2016. Personality-targeted gamification: a survey study on personality traits and motivational affordances. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2001–2013.

Karl M Kapp. 2012.The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.

Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Isabela Gasparini, Marcelo Soares Pimenta, and Juho Hamari. 2020. Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2020), 102495.

Elise Lavoué, Baptiste Monterrat, Michel Desmarais, and Sébastien George. 2018. Adaptive gamification for learning environments. IEEE Transactions on LearningTechnologies 12, 1 (2018), 16–28.

Christian E Lopez and Conrad S Tucker. 2019. The effects of player type on performance: A gamification case study. Computers in Human Behavior 91 (2019), 333–345.

Andrzej Marczewski. 2015. Even Ninja Monkeys like to play. CreateSpace Indep. Publish Platform, Charleston, Chapter User Types (2015), 69–84.

Lennart E Nacke, Chris Bateman, and Regan L Mandryk. 2014. BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment computing 5, 1 (2014), 55–62.

Rita Orji, Gustavo F Tondello, and Lennart E Nacke. 2018. Personalizing persuasive strategies in gameful systems to gamification user types. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Marcela Pessoa, David Fernandes, Leandro Silva Galvão de Carvalho, Elaine Oliveira, Walter Nakamura, and Tayana Conte. 2019. CodePlay: Uma Plataforma de Gamificação baseada em Jogos de RPG Multiplayer. In Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE), Vol. 30. 843.

Ralph Breno Silva Ribeiro, Leandro Silva Galvão de Carvalho, Elaine Harada Teixeira de Oliveira, David Braga Fernandes de Oliveira, and Marcela Savia Picanco Pessoa. 2020. Investigação empírica sobre os efeitos da gamificação de um juiz online em uma disciplina de introdução à programação. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação 28 (2020), 461–490.

Benjamin Sanders and Jims Marchang. 2016. A novel taxonomy of opportunities and risks in massively multiplayer online role playing games. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems. 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012071.3012094

Anne Sullivan, Michael Mateas, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2010. Rules of Engagement: Moving Beyond Combat-based Quests. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Narrative Technologies III Workshop (Monterey, California) (INT3 ’10). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, Article 11, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1822309.1822320

Armando Toda, Filipe Dwan Pereira, Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Luiz Rodrigues, Paula Palomino, Wilk Oliveira, Elaine Harada Teixeira Oliveira, Isabela Gasparini, Alexandra Ioana Cristea, and Seiji Isotani. 2020. For whom should we gamify? Insights on the users intentions and context towards gamification in education. In Anais do XXXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação. SBC, 471–480.

Gustavo F Tondello, Karina Arrambide, Giovanni Ribeiro, Andrew Jian-lan Cen, and Lennart E Nacke. 2019. “I don’t fit into a single type”: A Trait Model and Scaleof Game Playing Preferences. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 375–395.

Gustavo F Tondello, Rina R Wehbe, Lisa Diamond, Marc Busch, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E Nacke. 2016. The gamification user types hexad scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play. 229–243.

Anders Tychsen, Michael Hitchens, and Thea Brolund. 2008. Motivations for Play in Computer Role-playing Games. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (Future Play ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1496984.1496995
Publicado
26/04/2021
MELO, Rafaela; PESSOA, Marcela; HAYDAR, Gabriel; OLIVEIRA, David Braga Fernandes de; OLIVEIRA, Elaine Harada Teixeira de; CARVALHO, Leandro Silva Galvão de; CONTE, Tayana; PEREIRA, Filipe Dwan. Um estudo sobre a relação entre os elementos de jogos e os tipos de usuários de sistemas gamificados. In: LABORATÓRIO DE IDEIAS - SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE EDUCAÇÃO EM COMPUTAÇÃO (EDUCOMP), 1. , 2021, On-line. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2021 . p. 35-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/educomp_estendido.2021.14863.