How HCI concepts are used in articles featuring interactive digital arts: a literature review.
Resumo
Technological advancement has enabled the creation of new forms of digital art. Consequently, interactive digital art is becoming increasingly common. Additionally, some artists are concerned with the human aspects of the audience and their experiences, such as the feelings and emotions evoked by their artworks. As a result, there is a strong relationship between this type of art and human-computer interaction (HCI), which aims to understand the use of interactive systems in a specific context.This work presents a systematic literature review with the objective of identifying the HCI concepts present in the selected articles from the review. It aims to assist future research that seeks to comprehend how articles on interactive digital art utilize HCI concepts, and also to identify the most recurrent types of interactive digital art. Furthermore, it provides insights for the emergence of future research in relatively unexplored areas.
Palavras-chave:
Interactive Digital Art, Human Computer Interaction, Quality in HCI, Systematic review
Referências
Susan Ali, Ben Bedwell, and Boriana Koleva. 2018. Exploring Relationships between Museum Artefacts through Spatial Interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 224–235. DOI: 10.1145/3240167.3240217
S. Ashby, J. Hanna, and R. Rodrigues. 2017. Using BLE beacons to simulate proxemic surveillance for an interactive art installation. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings Part F127655 (2017), 1486–1493. DOI: 10.1145/3027063.3053096 cited By 2.
Simone Barbosa and Bruno Silva. 2010. Interação humano-computador. Elsevier Brasil.
Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Bruno Santana da Silva, Milene Selbach Silveira, Isabela Gasparini, Ticianne Darin, and Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2021. Interação Humano-Computador e Experiência do Usuário. Autopublicação.
Y.-S. Chang and K.-J. Hu. 2020. Usability evaluation for the integration of library data analysis and an interactive artwork by sensing technology. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 10, 21 (2020), 1–19. DOI: 10.3390/app10217499 cited By 0.
Z. Chen, J. Liao, J. Chen, C. Zhou, F. Chai, Y. Wu, and P. Hansen. 2021. Paint with Your Mind: Designing EEG-based Interactive Installation for Traditional Chinese Artworks. TEI 2021 - Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (2021). DOI: 10.1145/3430524.3442455 cited By 0.
O.-H. Cho and S.-D. Hong. 2017. Real-time 3D fluid simulation digital art using BCI. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 13, 3 (2017), 419–429. DOI: 10.1007/s11554-015-0546-y cited By 1.
João Cordeiro, Filipa Martins de Abreu, and Gerald Estadieu. 2017. Audience Participation in Interactive Art Systems: Is Instructional Signage a Necessary Evil?. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–37. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106595
Adèle De Jager, Andrea Fogarty, Anna Tewson, Caroline Lenette, and Katherine M Boydell. 2017. Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review. The Qualitative Report 22, 10 (2017), 2548–2582.
Emanuel Felipe Duarte and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. Revisiting Interactive Art from an Interaction Design Perspective: Opening a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Belém, Brazil) (IHC 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 35, 10 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3274192.3274227
Ernest Edmonds. 2017. The art of interaction: What HCI can learn from interactive art. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 11, 1 (2017), i–73.
Gérald Estadieu, Filipa Martins de Abreu, and Alvaro Barbosa. 2017. 3D Printing Objects as Installation Art: Standing Humanity: 3D Yan Character. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106588
Yuning Fan. 2021. An Open-Source Programming Language-Based Interactive Device: Popular Science of the Five Cereals for Children. In 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE). 758–761. DOI: 10.1109/ICBAIE52039.2021.9389899
Sarah Fdili Alaoui. 2019. Making an Interactive Dance Piece: Tensions in Integrating Technology in Art. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1195–1208. DOI: 10.1145/3322276.3322289
N. Fellion, A.K. Eady, and A. Girouard. 2016. FlexStylus: A deformable stylus for digital art. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 07-12-May-2016 (2016), 2482–2489. DOI: 10.1145/2851581.2892444 cited By 4.
Jules Françoise, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Yves Candau. 2022. CO/DA: Live-Coding Movement-Sound Interactions for Dance Improvisation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 482, 13 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3501916
Kaori Fujinami, Mami Kosaka, and Bipin Indurkhya. 2018. Painting an Apple with an Apple: A Tangible Tabletop Interface for Painting with Physical Objects. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4, Article 162 (Dec. 2018), 22 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3287040
Manuela Garretón, Andrea Rihm, and Denis Parra. 2019. #Default #Interactiveart #Audiencexperience. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (San Francisco, USA) (WWW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 791–798. DOI: 10.1145/3308560.3316453
A. Giomi. 2020. Somatic Sonification in Dance Performances. from the Artistic to the Perceptual and Back. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2020). DOI: 10.1145/3401956.3404226 cited By 1.
Pablo Gobira. 2018. Percursos contemporâneos. Realidades da arte, ciência e tecnologia. Belo Horizonte: EdUEMG (2018).
V. Goudarzi and A.-M. Gioti. 2019. Engagement and interaction in participatory sound art. SMC 2016 - 13th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Proceedings (2019), 179–184. [link] cited By 1.
Neelu Gurung, Damith Herath, and Janie Busby Grant. 2021. Feeling Safe: A Study on Trust with an Interactive Robotic Art Installation. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 447–451. DOI: 10.1145/3434074.3447211
Byeongwon Ha. 2019. Ordinary People: Participatory Interactive Art. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 81, 3 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359954
I. Hacmun, D. Regev, and R. Salomon. 2021. Artistic creation in virtual reality for art therapy: A qualitative study with expert art therapists. Arts in Psychotherapy 72 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2020.101745 cited By 1.
Y.C. Han and P. Surve. 2019. Eyes: Iris sonification and interactive biometric art. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019). DOI: 10.1145/3290607.3313288 cited By 2.
P. Ihamäki and K. Heljakka. 2019. The internet of art as a site for learning and fun – Playful experiences through augmented geocaching. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2359 (2019), 205–216. [link] cited By 0.
Jennifer Jacobs, Sumit Gogia, Radomír Mundefinedch, and Joel R. Brandt. 2017. Supporting Expressive Procedural Art Creation through Direct Manipulation. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6330–6341. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025927
G. Jamin, T. Luyten, R. Delsing, and S. Braun. 2018. The process of co-creating the interface for VENSTER, an interactive artwork for nursing home residents with dementia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 13, 8 (2018), 809–818. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1385102 cited By 3.
J.-F. Jégo and M.B. Meneghini. 2020. Let’s Resonate: How to Elicit Improvisation and Letting Go in Interactive Digital Art. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2020). DOI: 10.1145/3401956.3404194 cited By 0.
Laewoo (Leo) Kang, Steven J. Jackson, and Phoebe Sengers. 2018. Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173734
Daniel F. Keefe, Seth Johnson, Ross Altheimer, Deuk-Geun Hong, Robert Hunter, Andrea J. Johnson, Maura Rockcastle, Mark Swackhamer, and Aaron Wittkamper. 2018. Weather Report: A Site-Specific Artwork Interweaving Human Experiences and Scientific Data Physicalization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38, 4 (2018), 10–16. DOI: 10.1109/MCG.2018.042731653
Staffs Keele 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report. Citeseer.
Barbara Kitchenham. 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University 33, 2004 (2004), 1–26.
Janin Koch, Jennifer Pearson, Andrés Lucero, Miriam Sturdee, Wendy E. Mackay, Makayla Lewis, and Simon Robinson. 2020. Where Art Meets Technology: Integrating Tangible and Intelligent Tools in Creative Processes. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/3334480.3375172
Zsolt Koren, Emma Lógó, and Bálint Szabó. 2019. Visitor experiences in The Museum of Applied Arts of Budapest : Interactions with ColourMirror. In 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). 521–524. DOI: 10.1109/CogInfoCom47531.2019.9089894
Hannu Kukka, Johanna Ylipulli, Jorge Goncalves, Timo Ojala, Matias Kukka, and Mirja Syrjälä. 2017. Creator-centric study of digital art exhibitions on interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 37–48.
Duri Long, Mikhail Jacob, Nicholas Davis, and Brian Magerko. 2017. Designing for Socially Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Singapore, Singapore) (C&C ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–50. DOI: 10.1145/3059454.3059479
Tom Luyten, Susy Braun, Susan Van Hooren, and Luc De Witte. 2017. Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review. International Journal of Arts and Technology 10, 2 (2017), 94–134.
Kristina Mah, Lian Loke, and Luke Hespanhol. 2020. Designing With Ritual Interaction: A Novel Approach to Compassion Cultivation Through a Buddhist-Inspired Interactive Artwork. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 363–375. DOI: 10.1145/3374920.3374947
Gennie Mansi, Sue Reon Kim, and Jessica Roberts. 2022. Ready, Set, Art: Technology Needs and Tools for Remote K-2 Art Education. In Interaction Design and Children (Braga, Portugal) (IDC ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 150–184. DOI: 10.1145/3501712.3529731
Aderito Marcos. 2012. Instanciando mecanismos de a/r/tografia no processo de criação em arte digital/computacional. inVISIBILIDADES-Revista Iberoamericana de Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Artes 3 (2012), 138–145.
Ana Marques and Pedro Alves da Veiga. 2019. Digital Artivism and Collaborative Artistic Practice: Usage in a School Environment as a Citizenship Development Tool. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 10 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359863
Ana Marques and Rui Gaspar. 2017. ARBOR: (Re)Discovering Writing Interaction with 1st Grade Students. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 15–21. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106592
R. Masu, N.N. Correia, S. Jurgens, I. Druzetic, and W. Primett. 2019. How do Dancers Want to Use Interactive Technology?: Appropriation and Layers of Meaning beyond Traditional Movement Mapping. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2019). DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359869 cited By 4.
Sara Mlakar, Thomas Preindl, Andreas Pointner, Mira Alida Haberfellner, Rainer Danner, Roland Aigner, and Michael Haller. 2022. The Sound of Textile: An Interactive Tactile-Sonic Installation. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Aveiro, Portugal, Portugal) (ARTECH 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 95, 3 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3483529.3483742
S.A. Mokhov, M. Song, S.P. Mudur, and P. Grogono. 2019. Hands-on: Rapid interactive application prototyping for media arts and performing arts in illimitable space. ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Studio, SIGGRAPH 2019 (2019). DOI: 10.1145/3306306.3328008 cited By 1.
Serguei A. Mokhov, Miao Song, Sudhir P. Mudur, and Peter Grogono. 2018. Hands-on: Rapid Interactive Application Prototyping for Media Arts and Stage Performance and Beyond. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2018 Courses (Tokyo, Japan) (SA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 32 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3277644.3277760
Timothy Neate, Abi Roper, and Stephanie Wilson. 2020. Painting a Picture of Accessible Digital Art. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, Greece) (ASSETS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 76, 3 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3373625.3418019
V. Nisi, M. Dionísio, P. Bala, T. Gross, and N.J. Nunes. 2017. DreamScope: Evaluating interactive 360° virtual reality in a physical narrative art installation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series Part F130947 (2017), 67–75. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106601 cited By 1.
Jonas Oppenlaender. 2022. The Creativity of Text-to-Image Generation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Tampere, Finland) (Academic Mindtrek ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 192–202. DOI: 10.1145/3569219.3569352
Mark Petticrew and Helen Roberts. 2008. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Ivna Motta Ravanello, Fabiane Wolff, and Vinicius Gadis Ribeiro. 2016. Uma revisão sistemática da produção bibliográfica sobre experiência do usuário no campo do design. Ergodesign & HCI, Rio de Janeiro4 (2016), 1–8.
Marta Resende, Diana Carvalho, Anabela Branco, and Tânia Rocha. 2022. Art & Accessibility: A Case Study on Collage for People with Visual Disabilities. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Aveiro, Portugal, Portugal) (ARTECH 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 7 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3483529.3483676
Betty Sargeant, Justin Dwyer, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2020. Designing for Virtual Touch: A Real-Time Co-Created Online Art Experience. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Virtual Event, Canada) (CHI PLAY ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129–133. DOI: 10.1145/3383668.3419936
Leah M. Scolere, Eric P.S. Baumer, Lindsay Reynolds, and Geri Gay. 2016. Building Mood, Building Community: Usage Patterns of an Interactive Art Installation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–212. DOI: 10.1145/2957276.2957291
Ahmed Seffah, Jan Gulliksen, and Michel C Desmarais. 2005. Human-centered software engineering-integrating usability in the software development lifecycle. Vol. 8. Springer Science & Business Media.
Maria Shugrina, Chin-Ying Li, and Sanja Fidler. 2022. Neural Brushstroke Engine: Learning a Latent Style Space of Interactive Drawing Tools. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 6, Article 269 (nov 2022), 18 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3550454.3555472
C. Steer. 2017. Designing mobile deformable controls for creation of digital art. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2017 (2017). DOI: 10.1145/3098279.3119923 cited By 0.
Annie Sungkajun and Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo. 2019. Though Miles Apart: An Interactive Art Installation That Evokes Nostalgia. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 6 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359890
Zoe Tong and Dana Kulic. 2021. Learning to Engage in Interactive Digital Art. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (College Station, TX, USA) (IUI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–279. DOI: 10.1145/3397481.3450691
Mark Tribe and Reena Jana. 2007. New Media Art-Introduction. In Brown University Wiki: Art, Technology and Culture Colloquium.
Brygg Ullmer, Blake Tregre, and Malcolm McClay. 2017. Framing Fraught Topics through Tangible Multi-Display Engagement with Live News. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Lugano, Switzerland) (PerDis ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 8 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3078810.3078832
Thomas van den Berge. 2021. Vermillion: Oil Painting Simulation In Virtual Reality: A New Tool for Digital Artists Offering the Analog Control of Traditional Painting with the Benefits of a Virtual Environment.. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Immersive Pavilion (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGGRAPH ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 2 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3450615.3464542
S. Ashby, J. Hanna, and R. Rodrigues. 2017. Using BLE beacons to simulate proxemic surveillance for an interactive art installation. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings Part F127655 (2017), 1486–1493. DOI: 10.1145/3027063.3053096 cited By 2.
Simone Barbosa and Bruno Silva. 2010. Interação humano-computador. Elsevier Brasil.
Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Bruno Santana da Silva, Milene Selbach Silveira, Isabela Gasparini, Ticianne Darin, and Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2021. Interação Humano-Computador e Experiência do Usuário. Autopublicação.
Y.-S. Chang and K.-J. Hu. 2020. Usability evaluation for the integration of library data analysis and an interactive artwork by sensing technology. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 10, 21 (2020), 1–19. DOI: 10.3390/app10217499 cited By 0.
Z. Chen, J. Liao, J. Chen, C. Zhou, F. Chai, Y. Wu, and P. Hansen. 2021. Paint with Your Mind: Designing EEG-based Interactive Installation for Traditional Chinese Artworks. TEI 2021 - Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (2021). DOI: 10.1145/3430524.3442455 cited By 0.
O.-H. Cho and S.-D. Hong. 2017. Real-time 3D fluid simulation digital art using BCI. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 13, 3 (2017), 419–429. DOI: 10.1007/s11554-015-0546-y cited By 1.
João Cordeiro, Filipa Martins de Abreu, and Gerald Estadieu. 2017. Audience Participation in Interactive Art Systems: Is Instructional Signage a Necessary Evil?. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–37. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106595
Adèle De Jager, Andrea Fogarty, Anna Tewson, Caroline Lenette, and Katherine M Boydell. 2017. Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review. The Qualitative Report 22, 10 (2017), 2548–2582.
Emanuel Felipe Duarte and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. Revisiting Interactive Art from an Interaction Design Perspective: Opening a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Belém, Brazil) (IHC 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 35, 10 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3274192.3274227
Ernest Edmonds. 2017. The art of interaction: What HCI can learn from interactive art. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 11, 1 (2017), i–73.
Gérald Estadieu, Filipa Martins de Abreu, and Alvaro Barbosa. 2017. 3D Printing Objects as Installation Art: Standing Humanity: 3D Yan Character. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106588
Yuning Fan. 2021. An Open-Source Programming Language-Based Interactive Device: Popular Science of the Five Cereals for Children. In 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE). 758–761. DOI: 10.1109/ICBAIE52039.2021.9389899
Sarah Fdili Alaoui. 2019. Making an Interactive Dance Piece: Tensions in Integrating Technology in Art. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1195–1208. DOI: 10.1145/3322276.3322289
N. Fellion, A.K. Eady, and A. Girouard. 2016. FlexStylus: A deformable stylus for digital art. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 07-12-May-2016 (2016), 2482–2489. DOI: 10.1145/2851581.2892444 cited By 4.
Jules Françoise, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Yves Candau. 2022. CO/DA: Live-Coding Movement-Sound Interactions for Dance Improvisation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 482, 13 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3501916
Kaori Fujinami, Mami Kosaka, and Bipin Indurkhya. 2018. Painting an Apple with an Apple: A Tangible Tabletop Interface for Painting with Physical Objects. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4, Article 162 (Dec. 2018), 22 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3287040
Manuela Garretón, Andrea Rihm, and Denis Parra. 2019. #Default #Interactiveart #Audiencexperience. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (San Francisco, USA) (WWW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 791–798. DOI: 10.1145/3308560.3316453
A. Giomi. 2020. Somatic Sonification in Dance Performances. from the Artistic to the Perceptual and Back. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2020). DOI: 10.1145/3401956.3404226 cited By 1.
Pablo Gobira. 2018. Percursos contemporâneos. Realidades da arte, ciência e tecnologia. Belo Horizonte: EdUEMG (2018).
V. Goudarzi and A.-M. Gioti. 2019. Engagement and interaction in participatory sound art. SMC 2016 - 13th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Proceedings (2019), 179–184. [link] cited By 1.
Neelu Gurung, Damith Herath, and Janie Busby Grant. 2021. Feeling Safe: A Study on Trust with an Interactive Robotic Art Installation. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 447–451. DOI: 10.1145/3434074.3447211
Byeongwon Ha. 2019. Ordinary People: Participatory Interactive Art. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 81, 3 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359954
I. Hacmun, D. Regev, and R. Salomon. 2021. Artistic creation in virtual reality for art therapy: A qualitative study with expert art therapists. Arts in Psychotherapy 72 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2020.101745 cited By 1.
Y.C. Han and P. Surve. 2019. Eyes: Iris sonification and interactive biometric art. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019). DOI: 10.1145/3290607.3313288 cited By 2.
P. Ihamäki and K. Heljakka. 2019. The internet of art as a site for learning and fun – Playful experiences through augmented geocaching. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2359 (2019), 205–216. [link] cited By 0.
Jennifer Jacobs, Sumit Gogia, Radomír Mundefinedch, and Joel R. Brandt. 2017. Supporting Expressive Procedural Art Creation through Direct Manipulation. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6330–6341. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025927
G. Jamin, T. Luyten, R. Delsing, and S. Braun. 2018. The process of co-creating the interface for VENSTER, an interactive artwork for nursing home residents with dementia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 13, 8 (2018), 809–818. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1385102 cited By 3.
J.-F. Jégo and M.B. Meneghini. 2020. Let’s Resonate: How to Elicit Improvisation and Letting Go in Interactive Digital Art. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2020). DOI: 10.1145/3401956.3404194 cited By 0.
Laewoo (Leo) Kang, Steven J. Jackson, and Phoebe Sengers. 2018. Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173734
Daniel F. Keefe, Seth Johnson, Ross Altheimer, Deuk-Geun Hong, Robert Hunter, Andrea J. Johnson, Maura Rockcastle, Mark Swackhamer, and Aaron Wittkamper. 2018. Weather Report: A Site-Specific Artwork Interweaving Human Experiences and Scientific Data Physicalization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38, 4 (2018), 10–16. DOI: 10.1109/MCG.2018.042731653
Staffs Keele 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report. Citeseer.
Barbara Kitchenham. 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University 33, 2004 (2004), 1–26.
Janin Koch, Jennifer Pearson, Andrés Lucero, Miriam Sturdee, Wendy E. Mackay, Makayla Lewis, and Simon Robinson. 2020. Where Art Meets Technology: Integrating Tangible and Intelligent Tools in Creative Processes. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/3334480.3375172
Zsolt Koren, Emma Lógó, and Bálint Szabó. 2019. Visitor experiences in The Museum of Applied Arts of Budapest : Interactions with ColourMirror. In 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). 521–524. DOI: 10.1109/CogInfoCom47531.2019.9089894
Hannu Kukka, Johanna Ylipulli, Jorge Goncalves, Timo Ojala, Matias Kukka, and Mirja Syrjälä. 2017. Creator-centric study of digital art exhibitions on interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 37–48.
Duri Long, Mikhail Jacob, Nicholas Davis, and Brian Magerko. 2017. Designing for Socially Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Singapore, Singapore) (C&C ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–50. DOI: 10.1145/3059454.3059479
Tom Luyten, Susy Braun, Susan Van Hooren, and Luc De Witte. 2017. Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review. International Journal of Arts and Technology 10, 2 (2017), 94–134.
Kristina Mah, Lian Loke, and Luke Hespanhol. 2020. Designing With Ritual Interaction: A Novel Approach to Compassion Cultivation Through a Buddhist-Inspired Interactive Artwork. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 363–375. DOI: 10.1145/3374920.3374947
Gennie Mansi, Sue Reon Kim, and Jessica Roberts. 2022. Ready, Set, Art: Technology Needs and Tools for Remote K-2 Art Education. In Interaction Design and Children (Braga, Portugal) (IDC ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 150–184. DOI: 10.1145/3501712.3529731
Aderito Marcos. 2012. Instanciando mecanismos de a/r/tografia no processo de criação em arte digital/computacional. inVISIBILIDADES-Revista Iberoamericana de Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Artes 3 (2012), 138–145.
Ana Marques and Pedro Alves da Veiga. 2019. Digital Artivism and Collaborative Artistic Practice: Usage in a School Environment as a Citizenship Development Tool. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 10 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359863
Ana Marques and Rui Gaspar. 2017. ARBOR: (Re)Discovering Writing Interaction with 1st Grade Students. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 15–21. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106592
R. Masu, N.N. Correia, S. Jurgens, I. Druzetic, and W. Primett. 2019. How do Dancers Want to Use Interactive Technology?: Appropriation and Layers of Meaning beyond Traditional Movement Mapping. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2019). DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359869 cited By 4.
Sara Mlakar, Thomas Preindl, Andreas Pointner, Mira Alida Haberfellner, Rainer Danner, Roland Aigner, and Michael Haller. 2022. The Sound of Textile: An Interactive Tactile-Sonic Installation. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Aveiro, Portugal, Portugal) (ARTECH 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 95, 3 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3483529.3483742
S.A. Mokhov, M. Song, S.P. Mudur, and P. Grogono. 2019. Hands-on: Rapid interactive application prototyping for media arts and performing arts in illimitable space. ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Studio, SIGGRAPH 2019 (2019). DOI: 10.1145/3306306.3328008 cited By 1.
Serguei A. Mokhov, Miao Song, Sudhir P. Mudur, and Peter Grogono. 2018. Hands-on: Rapid Interactive Application Prototyping for Media Arts and Stage Performance and Beyond. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2018 Courses (Tokyo, Japan) (SA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 32 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3277644.3277760
Timothy Neate, Abi Roper, and Stephanie Wilson. 2020. Painting a Picture of Accessible Digital Art. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, Greece) (ASSETS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 76, 3 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3373625.3418019
V. Nisi, M. Dionísio, P. Bala, T. Gross, and N.J. Nunes. 2017. DreamScope: Evaluating interactive 360° virtual reality in a physical narrative art installation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series Part F130947 (2017), 67–75. DOI: 10.1145/3106548.3106601 cited By 1.
Jonas Oppenlaender. 2022. The Creativity of Text-to-Image Generation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Tampere, Finland) (Academic Mindtrek ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 192–202. DOI: 10.1145/3569219.3569352
Mark Petticrew and Helen Roberts. 2008. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Ivna Motta Ravanello, Fabiane Wolff, and Vinicius Gadis Ribeiro. 2016. Uma revisão sistemática da produção bibliográfica sobre experiência do usuário no campo do design. Ergodesign & HCI, Rio de Janeiro4 (2016), 1–8.
Marta Resende, Diana Carvalho, Anabela Branco, and Tânia Rocha. 2022. Art & Accessibility: A Case Study on Collage for People with Visual Disabilities. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Aveiro, Portugal, Portugal) (ARTECH 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 7 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3483529.3483676
Betty Sargeant, Justin Dwyer, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2020. Designing for Virtual Touch: A Real-Time Co-Created Online Art Experience. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Virtual Event, Canada) (CHI PLAY ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129–133. DOI: 10.1145/3383668.3419936
Leah M. Scolere, Eric P.S. Baumer, Lindsay Reynolds, and Geri Gay. 2016. Building Mood, Building Community: Usage Patterns of an Interactive Art Installation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–212. DOI: 10.1145/2957276.2957291
Ahmed Seffah, Jan Gulliksen, and Michel C Desmarais. 2005. Human-centered software engineering-integrating usability in the software development lifecycle. Vol. 8. Springer Science & Business Media.
Maria Shugrina, Chin-Ying Li, and Sanja Fidler. 2022. Neural Brushstroke Engine: Learning a Latent Style Space of Interactive Drawing Tools. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 6, Article 269 (nov 2022), 18 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3550454.3555472
C. Steer. 2017. Designing mobile deformable controls for creation of digital art. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2017 (2017). DOI: 10.1145/3098279.3119923 cited By 0.
Annie Sungkajun and Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo. 2019. Though Miles Apart: An Interactive Art Installation That Evokes Nostalgia. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 6 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3359852.3359890
Zoe Tong and Dana Kulic. 2021. Learning to Engage in Interactive Digital Art. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (College Station, TX, USA) (IUI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–279. DOI: 10.1145/3397481.3450691
Mark Tribe and Reena Jana. 2007. New Media Art-Introduction. In Brown University Wiki: Art, Technology and Culture Colloquium.
Brygg Ullmer, Blake Tregre, and Malcolm McClay. 2017. Framing Fraught Topics through Tangible Multi-Display Engagement with Live News. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Lugano, Switzerland) (PerDis ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 8 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3078810.3078832
Thomas van den Berge. 2021. Vermillion: Oil Painting Simulation In Virtual Reality: A New Tool for Digital Artists Offering the Analog Control of Traditional Painting with the Benefits of a Virtual Environment.. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Immersive Pavilion (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGGRAPH ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 2 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3450615.3464542
Publicado
16/10/2023
Como Citar
BATISTA, Nathan Lima; MONTEIRO, Ingrid Teixeira.
How HCI concepts are used in articles featuring interactive digital arts: a literature review.. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO SOBRE FATORES HUMANOS EM SISTEMAS COMPUTACIONAIS (IHC), 22. , 2023, Maceió/AL.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2023
.
