They Say That the World Was Built for Two, But Deceptive Patterns Say Otherwise: A Critical Game for Player Empowerment

Resumo


The digital games industry constantly grows, earning billions of dollars annually. However, developers often use design patterns detrimental to the player’s well-being to profit and engage players. These practices are called “Deceptive Patterns”. The frequency of use of these patterns frustrates players’ basic psychological needs, leading to ill-being and undesirable outcomes, such as addictive behavior. Although there is already knowledge about these negative patterns, oftenly players continue to be impacted by these practices, unware of their damages. To promote discussion on this topic, we developed a critical game based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) concepts to stimulate critical reflection on the use and consequences of using these patterns in games. We evaluated the game’s interest in players about the theme and the quality of the game-player interaction, considering playability, player experience, and engagement. For that, we employed the Playability Model, Player Experience Brazilian Inventory (PX-Br), and User Engagement Scale in Portuguese (UES-Br). The results shows that although users recognize some of these patterns, they are unaware of the negative impact that deceptive patterns can have on players. In addition, the results indicate positive playability, especially the interactive aspect. The player experience and engagement were also evaluated positively, with emphasis on constructs such as fun, playability and aesthetic appeal.

Palavras-chave: Critical game, Deceptive patterns, Self-determination theory

Referências

Jacob Aagaard, Miria Emma Clausen Knudsen, Per Bækgaard, and Kevin Doherty. 2022. A Game of Dark Patterns: Designing Healthy, Highly-Engaging Mobile Games. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–8.

Johnie J Allen and Craig A Anderson. 2018. Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the real world and in video games predict internet gaming disorder scores and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior 84 (2018), 220–229.

Gina M Almerico and Russell K Baker. 2004. Bloom’s Taxonomy illustrative verbs: Developing a comprehensive list for educator use. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal 1, 4 (2004), 1–10.

Renan Vinicius Aranha and Fátima LS Nunes. 2022. Player Experience with Brazilian accent: development and validation of PX-BR, a summarized instrument in Portuguese. In Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. 1–8.

Nick Ballou and Sebastian Deterding. 2023. ‘I Just Wanted to Get it Over and Done With’: A Grounded Theory of Psychological Need Frustration in Video Games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CHI PLAY (2023), 217–236.

Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, BS da Silva, Milene Selbach Silveira, Isabela Gasparini, Ticianne Darin, and Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2021. Interação humano-computador e experiência do usuario. Auto publicação (2021).

Jim Bizzocchi. 2007. Games and narrative: An analytical framework. Loading-The Journal of the Canadian Games Studies Association 1, 1 (2007), 5–10.

Harry Brignull. [n. d.]. Deceptive Patterns. [link].

Michael Callaghan, Niall McShane, Augusto Eguíluz, and Maggi Savin-Baden. 2018. Extending the activity theory based model for serious games design in engineering to integrate analytics. (2018).

Maira B Carvalho, Francesco Bellotti, Riccardo Berta, Alessandro De Gloria, Carolina Islas Sedano, Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, Jun Hu, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2015. An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Computers & education 87 (2015), 166–181.

Ticianne Darin, Nayana Carneiro, David Miranda, and Bianca Coelho. 2023. Challenges in Evaluating Players’ Interaction with Digital Games. In Grand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment Computing in Brazil GranDGamesBR 2020–2030, Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos and Marcelo da Silva Hounsell (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 1–24.

Steffi De Jans, Klara Van Geit, Veroline Cauberghe, Liselot Hudders, and Marijke De Veirman. 2017. Using games to raise awareness: How to co-design serious mini-games? Computers & Education 110 (2017), 77–87.

Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2012. Self-determination theory. (2012).

Sonia Fizek, Mikhail Fiadotau, Hanna Wirman, and Maria Garda. 2023. Teaching Environmentally Conscious Game Design: Lessons and Challenges. ACM Games: Research and Practice 1, 1 (2023), 1–9.

Mary Flanagan. 2010. Creating critical play. Artists re: thinking games (2010), 49–53.

Mary Flanagan. 2018. Critical play and responsible design. In The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities. Routledge, 183–194.

Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2007. A game design methodology to incorporate social activist themes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 181–190.

Stephen Flood, Nicholas A Cradock-Henry, Paula Blackett, and Peter Edwards. 2018. Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making. Environmental Research Letters 13, 6 (2018), 063005.

Andrea Gauthier, Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta, Sveta Mayer, Iroise Dumontheil, Emily K Farran, Derek Bell, Denis Mareschal, and UnLocke Team. 2022. Redesigning learning games for different learning contexts: applying a serious game design framework to redesign Stop & Think. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 33 (2022), 100503.

Maryam Ghodsvali, Gamze Dane, and Bauke de Vries. 2022. An online serious game for decision-making on food-water-energy nexus policy. Sustainable Cities and Society 87 (2022), 104220.

Colin M Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L Toombs. 2018. The dark (patterns) side of UX design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.

Stephen Hart, Andrea Margheri, Federica Paci, and Vladimiro Sassone. 2020. Riskio: A serious game for cyber security awareness and education. Computers & Security 95 (2020), 101827.

Daphne Hefner and Peter Vorderer. 2017. Digital stress: Permanent connectedness and multitasking. In The Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-being, Leonard Reinecke and Mary Beth Oliver (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, 237– 249.

Annika Helamo. 2023. Fighting the dark side: a scoping review of dark pattern mitigation. (2023).

Hsing-Hua Hsiung, Chia-Yen Lin, and Guan-Yu Zhu. 2023. The impact of intellectual capital efficiency on value creation in video game industry—An evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 7, 3 (2023).

Dominykas Jèčius and Alexander Frestadius. 2022. How do players experience a gacha game depending on their perspective as a starting or a veteran player?: A case study of Genshin Impact.

Niklas Johannes, Matti Vuorre, and Andrew K Przybylski. 2021. Video game play is positively correlated with well-being. Royal Society open science 8, 2 (2021), 202049.

Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Vol. 12. –345. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772

Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A Nardi. 2009. Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT press.

Richard L Lamb, Leonard Annetta, Jonah Firestone, and Elisabeth Etopio. 2018. A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior 80 (2018), 158–167.

James Malazita and Casey O’Donnell. 2023. Introduction: Toward Critical Game Design. , 4–13 pages.

Dianna Marini, Wietske Medema, Jan Adamowski, Samuel PL Veissière, Igor Mayer, and Arjen EJ Wals. 2018. Socio-psychological perspectives on the potential for serious games to promote transcendental values in IWRM decision-making. Water 10, 8 (2018), 1097.

Devin J Mills, Marina Milyavskaya, Jessica Mettler, and Nancy L Heath. 2018. Exploring the pull and push underlying problem video game use: A SelfDetermination Theory approach. Personality and Individual Differences 135 (2018), 176–181.

David Miranda, Carmen Li, and Ticianne Darin. 2021. Ues-br: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the user engagement scale for brazilian portuguese. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CHI PLAY (2021), 1–22.

David Motta Miranda, Rebeca Maia Pontes, and Ticianne de Gois Ribeiro Darin. 2022. It’s dark but just a game: towards an ethical and healthy game design practice. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.

Mariana Muri, Kamila Rodrigues, and Ticianne Darin. 2023. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder-An Experience Report on Evaluating Aesthetics of a Design System for HUDs in EUD Serious Games. In Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.

Tina-Simone Neset, Lotta Andersson, Ola Uhrqvist, and Carlo Navarra. 2020. Serious gaming for climate adaptation—Assessing the potential and challenges of a digital serious game for urban climate adaptation. Sustainability 12, 5 (2020), 1789.

Dorian Peters, Rafael A Calvo, and Richard M Ryan. 2018. Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 797.

Scott Rigby and Richard M Ryan. 2011. Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw us in and Hold us Spellbound. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA.

Ryan Rogers. 2017. The motivational pull of video game feedback, rules, and social interaction: Another self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior 73 (2017), 446–450.

Margarida Romero. 2016. Digital game design as a complex learning activity for developing the 4Cs skills: Communication, collaboration, creativity and critical thinking. In Games and Learning Alliance: 4th International Conference, GALA 2015, Rome, Italy, December 9-11, 2015, Revised Selected Papers 4. Springer, 90–99.

Richard M Ryan, Randall R Curren, and Edward L Deci. 2013. What humans need: Flourishing in Aristotelian philosophy and self-determination theory. (2013).

Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68.

Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2017. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford publications.

Richard M Ryan, C Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion 30 (2006), 344–360.

José Luis González Sánchez and Francisco Luis Gutiérrez Vela. 2014. Assessing the player interaction experiences based on playability. Entertainment Computing 5, 4 (2014), 259–267.

Adriana Sigman. 2017. Screen dependency disorders: a new challenge for child neurology. J Int Child Neurol Ass 17 (2017), 119.

Carla Sousa and Ana Oliveira. 2023. The Dark Side of Fun: Understanding Dark Patterns and Literacy Needs in Early Childhood Mobile Gaming. In European Conference on Games Based Learning, Vol. 17. 599–610.

Bruno Mendes Souza, Marcos Almeida, and Rui Pedro Lopes. 2021. A decision game for informal learning. In 13th International Conference On Computer Supported Education (Csedu). 360–367.

Fotios Spyridonis and Damon Daylamani-Zad. 2019. A serious game for raising designer awareness of web accessibility guidelines. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2019: 17th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Paphos, Cyprus, September 2–6, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 17. Springer, 3–12.

Michael WR Stevens et al . 2021. Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 55, 6 (2021), 553–568.

Caroline Stockman, Anthony O’Connell, and Emma Nottingham. 2024. When it’s cute but also dark: critical analysis of FarmVille 3’s game design in the digital economy. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology (2024), 1–23.

April Tyack and Elisa D Mekler. 2020. Masterclass: Rethinking Self-Determination Theory in Player-Computer Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 1–2.

Ahmet Uysal and Irem Gokce Yildirim. 2016. Self-determination theory in digital games. Gamer psychology and behavior (2016), 123–135.

Rob Van Roy and Bieke Zaman. 2019. Unravelling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: A basic psychological needs perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 127 (2019), 38–50.

Tom Wijman. [n. d.]. Newzoo’s year in review: the 2023 global games market in numbers. [link]

Sara Wolf, Franzisca Maas, Pauline Künzl, Anna Hohm, and Jörn Hurtienne. 2022. UNeedS: Development of Scales to Measure the Satisfaction and Frustration of 13 Fundamental Needs. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022. 539–544.

Qianwen Yang and Xiang Gong. 2021. The engagement–addiction dilemma: an empirical evaluation of mobile user interface and mobile game affordance. Internet Research ahead-of-print (03 2021). DOI: 10.1108/INTR-11-2020-0622

José P Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark patterns in the design of games. In Foundations of Digital Games 2013.
Publicado
07/11/2024
SANTOS FILHO, Luiz; SOUSA JUNIOR, Alairton; RIBEIRO, Giovanna; DARIN, Ticianne. They Say That the World Was Built for Two, But Deceptive Patterns Say Otherwise: A Critical Game for Player Empowerment. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO SOBRE FATORES HUMANOS EM SISTEMAS COMPUTACIONAIS (IHC), 23. , 2024, Brasília/DF. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2024 . p. 405-419.