“It Takes a Village to Raise a Child” -Who and What to Consider in Designing Parental Mediation Features?
Abstract
Introduction: The pandemic intensified children’s use of connected devices, especially social media apps. The 2024 TIC Kids survey shows that over 60% of children aged 9–12 have profiles on these platforms (despite being under the minimum age of 13). This exposes them to risks like privacy loss, inappropriate content, and commercial exploitation. Objective: We aim to understand the main recommendations to design parental mediation and control features arising from the public consultation on platform regulation by CGI.br. Methodology or Steps: We analyzed the contributions on parental mediation regulations through thematic synthesis. Results: Based on this, we derived early requirements and evaluated TikTok and Instagram on these requirements.
References
Baroni, L. A. e Pereira, R. (2024). Deceptive patterns under a sociotechnical view. In XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13.
Baughan, A., Fu, Y., Izenman, E., Schwamm, S., Alsabeh, D., Powell, N., Hunt, E., Rich, M., Bickham, D., Radesky, J., et al. (2024). Investigating attention and normative dissociation in children’s social video games. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual ACM interaction design and children conference, pages 30–43.
Cao, J., Das, A., Emami-Naeini, P., et al. (2024). Understanding parents’ perceptions and practices toward children’s security and privacy in virtual reality. In 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 1554–1572. IEEE.
Castro, E. G. d. e Macedo, S. C. (2019). Estatuto da criança e adolescente e estatuto da juventude: interfaces, complementariedade, desafios e diferenças. Revista Direito e Práxis, 10(2):1214–1238.
Committee, C. et al. (2021). General comment no. 25 on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. [link]. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
Cruzes, D. S. e Dyba, T. (2011). Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In 2011 international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pages 275–284. IEEE.
de Oliveira, L. C., Amaral, M. A., Bim, S. A., Valença, G., Almeida, L. D. A., Salgado, L. C. d. C., Gasparini, I., e da Silva, C. B. R. (2024). Grandihc-br 2025-2035-gc3: Plurality and decoloniality in hci. In Proceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–19.
de Paula Albuquerque, O., Fantinato, M., Kelner, J., e de Albuquerque, A. P. (2020). Privacy in smart toys: Risks and proposed solutions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 39:100922.
Domingos, L. (2017). Telas e crianças: Conheça os mitos e riscos desta exposição. [link]. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
dos Santos Madeira, F. N., de Souza Rosa, M., Ferreira, A. G. N., Dias, I. C. C. M., e Bezerra, J. M. (2023). Análise de aplicativos móveis voltados para controle parental: revisão narrativa. Arquivos de Ciências da Saúde da UNIPAR, 27(3):1457–1476.
Geržiylek, V. (2023).cáková, M., Dedkova, L., e M` What do parents know about children’s risky online experiences? the role of parental mediation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 141:107626.
Ghedin, R. (2024). Controle parental não é a resposta. [link]. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
Gray, C. M., Santos, C., Bielova, N., e Mildner, T. (2024). An ontology of dark patterns knowledge: Foundations, definitions, and a pathway for shared knowledge-building. In 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–22.
Horkoff, J. e Yu, E. (2016). Interactive goal model analysis for early requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering, 21:29–61.
Iftikhar, Z., Haq, Q. R. u., Younus, O., Sardar, T., Arif, H., Javed, M., e Shahid, S. (2021). Designing parental monitoring and control technology: A systematic review. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 676–700. Springer.
NIC.BR (2024). Tic kids online brasil - 2024. [link], note = Accessed: 2025-05-09.
Nouwen, M., JafariNaimi, N., e Zaman, B. (2017). Parental controls: reimagining technologies for parent-child interaction. In 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Exploratory Papers, volume 2017, pages 18–34.
Ofcom (2022). Research into risk factors that may lead children to harm online. [link]. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
Pasquale, L., Zippo, P., Curley, C., O’Neill, B., e Mongiello, M. (2020). Digital age of consent and age verification: can they protect children? IEEE software, 39(3):50–57.
Silva, V. H. (2023). O ex-diretor do instagram que viu sua própria filha sofrer assédio na rede social. [link]. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
United Nations (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. [link]. com/yc3tj2tk. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
Winther, D. K., Livingstone, S., Saeed, M., et al. (2019). Growing up in a connected world. [link]. Accessed: 2025-05-09.
Wisniewski, P., Ghosh, A. K., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., e Carroll, J. M. (2017). Parental control vs. teen self-regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety? In ACM Conf. on Computer Sup. Cooperative Work and Social Comp., pages 51–69.
Yao, Y., McCollum, S., Sun, Z., e Zhang, Y. (2025). Easy as child’s play: An empirical study on age verification of adult-oriented android apps. In Proceedings of the 34th USENIX Security Symposium.
Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., De Ferrerre, E., e Looy, J. V. (2016). A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. J. of Broadcasting & Elec. Media, 60(1):1–22.
