Draught, Fish, and Presence: Teaching Semi-Arid Ecology with a CAVE
Resumo
Brazil’s north-eastern Sertão is shaped by erratic rainfall, ephemeral streams and prolonged drought, which reveal fragile hydrological pulses that static exhibits cannot convey: the rise and fall of water levels, the transient flow of waterways or the behavioural responses of fish to flood and drought. To address this, we created "Peixes do semiárido: Nadando no Seco" ("Semiarid Fish: Swimming in the Dry"), a four-wall-plus-floor CAVE installation that immersively portrays the entire aquatic cycle of the Açude Gargalheiras reservoir and the life-history strategies of five representative species (Prochilodus brevis, Leporinus piau, Hoplias malabaricus, Oreochromis niloticus and Cichla sp.). A 250-second pre-rendered film cycles through four ecological phases (Dry Night → Rain Inundation → Flood Life → Return to Drought) while a finite-state controller synchronises spawning, burrowing and mortality behaviours. An offline rendering-to-projection pipeline bypasses the 15 fps limit of live streaming, delivering seamless 3270 × 4500 px edge-blended imagery across five surfaces. By privileging passive observation—a deliberate design choice to enhance focus on complex ecological narratives—the exhibit reduces cognitive load, fits curator-staffing constraints and fosters situated learning. Grounded in regional ichthyological research, this reproducible, low-maintenance VR framework offers small and mid-sized museums a scalable model for high-fidelity environmental education. An online visitor survey (N=38) provided strong validation for the approach’s effectiveness in engagement and conveying hydrological dynamics, though participants suggested that more explicit cues could further enhance both the experience and its pedagogical impact.
Referências
R. Neupane et al. Virtual reality for environmental education: A meta-analysis. Environmental Education Research (2023).
S. O’Brien et al. Virtual environments for education and training: immersive 3D virtual learning environments and augmented reality applications. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning 6.2 (2013), pp. 1–8.
J. Nan et al. A survey of cave automatic virtual environment. Journal of Computer Research and Development 51.10 (2014), pp. 2147–2161.
L. Zhang. Development of a cave-based virtual reality system for immersive learning. Virtual Reality 25.4 (2021), pp. 987–1001.
M. Lebied et al. Enhancing presence in cave systems. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27.2 (2021), pp. 877–886.
Y. Hashimoto et al. Immersive projection display cave and its application to medical education. CyberPsychology Behavior 5.6 (2002), pp. 545–552.
S. Kageyama et al. Interactive simulation of tsunami inundation in a cave system for risk communication. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13.1 (2013), pp. 17–30.
K. Petkov and V. Poulkov. Applying immersive cave systems in telecommunications education. IEEE EDUCON (2012).
C. Soares and A. Silva. Immersive simulation of fluid dynamics using cave. Journal of Visualization (2010).
E. Rottler and G. Costa. Climate vulnerability of Brazil’s semi-arid sertao. Science of the Total Environment (2024).
E. Alcantara and R. Barbosa. Water scarcity and socio-environmental challenges in the Brazilian sertao. Sustainability (2021).
H. Barbosa and M. Silva. Erratic rainfall patterns in northeastern Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments (2012).
T. Koch and B. Muller. Hydrological modelling of seasonal droughts in the sertao. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (2020).
P. Silva and L. Teixeira. Endemic fish adaptations to extreme drought. Journal of Fish Biology (2022).
R. Santos and C. Almeida. Socio-environmental conflicts in Brazil’s semi-arid region. Environment, Development and Sustainability (2024).
J. Alves and A. Brito. Ecological literacy and community engagement in the sertao. Environmental Education Research (2020).
H. Justino. Cave automatic virtual environment (CAVE) applications in immersive analytics. Information 14.2 (2023), p. 118.
J. M. Ritz and A. R. Buss. A framework for aligning instructional design strategies with affordances of cave immersive virtual reality systems. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2016). Available via SciSpace: [link].
A. M. C. Souza et al. Medusozoa – an immersive and interactive virtual reality installation in a museum. 24th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR 2022), pp. 39–46.
J. Cho and S. Park. Empathy through immersion: VR-based education in endangered ecosystems. Virtual Reality and Education Journal (2023).
F. Choy et al. The effectiveness of virtual reality for learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 33 (2021), pp. 2021–2045.
M. Carrozzino and M. Bergamasco. Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive VR in real museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11.4 (2010), pp. 452–458.
P. Juarez and C. Bartneck. Implementing a low-cost CAVE system. Proceedings of VRIC (2010).
T. de Back et al. Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in cave-based virtual reality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (2020). Available via SciSpace: [link].
Z. He, X. Meng, and B. Zhang. vConnect: Connect the real world to the virtual world. IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (2014). Available via SciSpace: [link].
Z. He et al. vConnect: Perceive and interact with real world from CAVE. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2017). Available via SciSpace: [link].
F. Iacono et al. Cultural heritage and virtual reality: A setup for Balzi Rossi museum. International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies (2024). Available via SciSpace: [link].
P. Koutsabasis and V. Nikolakopoulou. Conveying intangible heritage with projection mapping: The Mastic Museum case. Proceedings of CAVIAR (2022).
N. Ioakeim, P. Printezis, and C. Skarimpas. Kirini: An interactive projection-mapping installation for storytelling about Mediterranean beekeeping heritage. Proceedings of CHI (2023).
Q. Wang, Y. Wang, and A. Smith. Atmospheric paleoart: A case study of the murals in the Paleozoological Museum of China. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (2024).
A. M. C. Souza et al. DinosaurVR: Using virtual reality to enhance a museum exhibition. Journal on Interactive Systems 14.1 (2023).
A. M. C. Souza et al. Deinonychus and the Cow – enhancing museum exhibitions through the use of mixed reality. Anais do XXIV Simposio de Realidade Virtual e Aumentada (2022), pp. 47–54. Available: [link].
T. Yamashita et al. AquaCAVE: An underwater immersive projection system using circular polarization. SIGGRAPH Asia Emerging Technologies (2020). Available: [link].
S. Magazine. Tour a submerged cave packed with paleolithic art—without ever venturing underwater. Smithsonian Magazine (2023). Available: [link].
National Ocean Service. Sanctuaries 360° Virtual Reality. NOAA (2023). Available: [link].
Musee Oceanographique de Monaco. Immerseave VR. 2023. Available: [link].
Mystic Aquarium. Undersea Explorer VR. 2023. Available: [link].
C. Levis, T. Ramos, and S. Lima. A Disputa Desigual entre Peixes Nativos e Exoticos do Semiarido. EDUFRN, 2013.
Unity Recorder Manual (Version 3.0). Unity Technologies, 2024. Available: [link].
C. W. Reynolds. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. SIGGRAPH ’87 (1987), pp. 25–34.
