The use of the iStar Framework for modeling tax compliance programs
Resumo
Modeling tax compliance programs is essential for organizations because these programs translate statutory obligations into organizational controls throughout the tax reporting lifecycle, requiring coordinated responsibilities, evidence generation, and data consistency across departments and thirdparty systems. Although traditional early requirements and process models are commonly used to model tax compliance programs, they are limited in capturing key dependencies among entities such as departments and outsourced systems. To address this gap, this study uses the iStar 2.0 framework as an alternative model to capture these dependencies. This framework focuses on representing actors, goals, and dependencies rather than processes. A proof of concept was conducted in a real-world scenario, where requirements were gathered through interviews and questionnaires and validated using the Delphi technique. The empirical results demonstrate the viability of the iStar framework for modeling and enriching tax compliance programs, highlighting responsibilities and quality attributes such as traceability and auditability. Therefore, the iStar 2.0 framework can be considered for modeling and enriching compliance programs.Referências
Cabello, O. G. and Nakao, S. H. (2021). Complexidade, conformidade e arrecadação tributária. Economia e Sociedade, 30(2):425–452.
Carneiro, C., Kudo, T., and Neto, R. B. (2024). Um método para transformação de requisitos legais em padrões de requisitos de software: Um estudo com a lgpd. In Anais do XXVII Congresso Ibero-Americano em Engenharia de Software, pages 348–355, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Coelho, M. (2021). Brazil: Tax expenditure rationalization within broader tax reform. IMF Working Paper WP/21/240, International Monetary Fund.
Costa, A. and Marques, J. (2024). Framework Ágil para certificação de software aeronáutico. In Anais do XXVII Congresso Ibero-Americano em Engenharia de Software, pages 439–440, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Dalpiaz, F., Franch, X., and Horkoff, J. (2016). istar 2.0 language guide. arXiv:1605.07767v3 [cs.SE].
de Lamboy, C. K., editor (2018). Manual de Compliance. VIA ÉTICA, São Paulo. 1ª edição. Bibliografia: p. 1001–1033.
Horkoff, J. and Yu, E. (2011). Analyzing goal models: Different approaches and how to choose among them. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ’11), pages 675–682, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Mustapha, A. M., Arogundade, O. T., Misra, S., Damasevicius, R., and Maskeliunas, R. (2020). A systematic literature review on compliance requirements management of business processes. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(3):561–576.
Ogungbesan, S. S. (2023). Stakeholders’ Engagement as a Strategy for Optimizing Voluntary Tax Compliance: A Case Study of the Nigerian Tax Administration. Doctorate of business administration (dba) dissertation, UNICAF University in Zambia. Approved by: Dr. Nissar Ahmad Yatoo (Supervisor), Dr. Elena Papadopoulou (Chair), Dr. Apostolos Dasilas (External Examiner), Dr. Christos Grose (Internal Examiner).
Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1):15–29.
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3):45–77.
Pimentel, J. and de Castro, J. B. (2018). pistar tool – a pluggable online tool for goal modeling. 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pages 498–499.
Silveira, R. d. M. J. and Saad-Diniz, E. (2015). Compliance, direito penal e Lei anticorrupção. Saraiva.
Souza, C. and Santander, V. (2011). Uma proposta de elicitação e análise de requisitos no contexto de médias e pequenas empresas de desenvolvimento de software. In Anais do 14th Workshop on Requirements Engineering (WER 2011), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. WER.
Speck, J. R., de Andrade, S. C., Santander, V. F. A., and Sorbar, F. (2025). Files istar, nfr to compliance. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29555078.
Yu, E. S. K. (1995). Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. Phd thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Carneiro, C., Kudo, T., and Neto, R. B. (2024). Um método para transformação de requisitos legais em padrões de requisitos de software: Um estudo com a lgpd. In Anais do XXVII Congresso Ibero-Americano em Engenharia de Software, pages 348–355, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Coelho, M. (2021). Brazil: Tax expenditure rationalization within broader tax reform. IMF Working Paper WP/21/240, International Monetary Fund.
Costa, A. and Marques, J. (2024). Framework Ágil para certificação de software aeronáutico. In Anais do XXVII Congresso Ibero-Americano em Engenharia de Software, pages 439–440, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Dalpiaz, F., Franch, X., and Horkoff, J. (2016). istar 2.0 language guide. arXiv:1605.07767v3 [cs.SE].
de Lamboy, C. K., editor (2018). Manual de Compliance. VIA ÉTICA, São Paulo. 1ª edição. Bibliografia: p. 1001–1033.
Horkoff, J. and Yu, E. (2011). Analyzing goal models: Different approaches and how to choose among them. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ’11), pages 675–682, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Mustapha, A. M., Arogundade, O. T., Misra, S., Damasevicius, R., and Maskeliunas, R. (2020). A systematic literature review on compliance requirements management of business processes. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(3):561–576.
Ogungbesan, S. S. (2023). Stakeholders’ Engagement as a Strategy for Optimizing Voluntary Tax Compliance: A Case Study of the Nigerian Tax Administration. Doctorate of business administration (dba) dissertation, UNICAF University in Zambia. Approved by: Dr. Nissar Ahmad Yatoo (Supervisor), Dr. Elena Papadopoulou (Chair), Dr. Apostolos Dasilas (External Examiner), Dr. Christos Grose (Internal Examiner).
Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1):15–29.
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3):45–77.
Pimentel, J. and de Castro, J. B. (2018). pistar tool – a pluggable online tool for goal modeling. 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pages 498–499.
Silveira, R. d. M. J. and Saad-Diniz, E. (2015). Compliance, direito penal e Lei anticorrupção. Saraiva.
Souza, C. and Santander, V. (2011). Uma proposta de elicitação e análise de requisitos no contexto de médias e pequenas empresas de desenvolvimento de software. In Anais do 14th Workshop on Requirements Engineering (WER 2011), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. WER.
Speck, J. R., de Andrade, S. C., Santander, V. F. A., and Sorbar, F. (2025). Files istar, nfr to compliance. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29555078.
Yu, E. S. K. (1995). Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. Phd thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Publicado
11/05/2026
Como Citar
SPECK, Jefferson Rodrigo; ANDRADE, Sidgley Camargo de; SANTANDER, Victor Francisco Araya; SORBAR, Fabiane.
The use of the iStar Framework for modeling tax compliance programs. In: CONGRESSO IBERO-AMERICANO EM ENGENHARIA DE SOFTWARE (CIBSE), 29. , 2026, Recife/PE.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2026
.
p. 16-30.
