Uso de Inteligência Artificial Conversacional na Educação de Crianças: Um Mapeamento Sistemático
Resumo
Devido ao avanço de novas tecnologias, houveram diversos aprimoramentos na área da educação por causa do surgimento de novas ferramentas. Uma das mais utilizadas atualmente são as Inteligências Artificiais Conversacionais, que permitem que o usuário faça perguntas e troque informações com a ferramenta. Portanto, é necessário entender como o uso destas ferramentas pode auxiliar na educação de crianças, visando entender seus impactos, limitações e necessidades. Além disso, é necessário garantir que o papel humano não seja substituído pela nova tecnologia durante a formação educacional infantil. Com intuito de responder a essas perguntas, foi realizada esta revisão sistemática da literatura.Referências
Delgado, J., West, R., Barmpoutis, A., Jang, S. H., Stanley, E., and Kang, H. (2024). Enhancing museum experience with vr by situating 3d collections in contex. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, pages 670–675.
Druga, S., Christoph, F. L., and Ko, A. J. (2022). Family as a third space for ai literacies: How do children and parents learn about ai together? In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–17.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004):1–26.
Kurian, N. (2023). Ai’s empathy gap: The risks of conversational artificial intelligence for young children’s well-being and key ethical considerations for early childhood education and care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, page 14639491231206004.
Kurian, N. (2024). ‘no, alexa, no!’: designing child-safe ai and protecting children from the risks of the ‘empathy gap’in large language models. Learning, Media and Technology, pages 1–14.
Luo, W., He, H., Liu, J., Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Zhou, Y., and Li, H. (2024). Aladdin’s genie or pandora’s box for early childhood education? experts chat on the roles, challenges, and developments of chatgpt. Early Education and Development, 35(1):96–113.
Perella-Holfeld, F., Sallam, S., Petrie, J., Gomez, R., Irani, P., and Sakamoto, Y. (2024). Parent and educator concerns on the pedagogical use of ai-equipped social robots. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 8(3):1–34.
Sweidan, S. Z., Almawajdeh, S. K., Khawaldeh, A. M., and Darabkh, K. A. (2024). Molhem: An innovative android application with an interactive avatar-based chatbot for arab children with asd. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1–35.
Van Brummelen, J., Kelleher, M., Tian, M. C., and Nguyen, N. (2023). What do children and parents want and perceive in conversational agents? towards transparent, trustworthy, democratized agents. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, pages 187–197.
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., Chai, C. S., and Xie, K. (2023). The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationships between prior knowledge and self-regulated learning through artificial intelligence chatbot. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4):967–986.
Druga, S., Christoph, F. L., and Ko, A. J. (2022). Family as a third space for ai literacies: How do children and parents learn about ai together? In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–17.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004):1–26.
Kurian, N. (2023). Ai’s empathy gap: The risks of conversational artificial intelligence for young children’s well-being and key ethical considerations for early childhood education and care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, page 14639491231206004.
Kurian, N. (2024). ‘no, alexa, no!’: designing child-safe ai and protecting children from the risks of the ‘empathy gap’in large language models. Learning, Media and Technology, pages 1–14.
Luo, W., He, H., Liu, J., Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Zhou, Y., and Li, H. (2024). Aladdin’s genie or pandora’s box for early childhood education? experts chat on the roles, challenges, and developments of chatgpt. Early Education and Development, 35(1):96–113.
Perella-Holfeld, F., Sallam, S., Petrie, J., Gomez, R., Irani, P., and Sakamoto, Y. (2024). Parent and educator concerns on the pedagogical use of ai-equipped social robots. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 8(3):1–34.
Sweidan, S. Z., Almawajdeh, S. K., Khawaldeh, A. M., and Darabkh, K. A. (2024). Molhem: An innovative android application with an interactive avatar-based chatbot for arab children with asd. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1–35.
Van Brummelen, J., Kelleher, M., Tian, M. C., and Nguyen, N. (2023). What do children and parents want and perceive in conversational agents? towards transparent, trustworthy, democratized agents. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, pages 187–197.
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., Chai, C. S., and Xie, K. (2023). The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationships between prior knowledge and self-regulated learning through artificial intelligence chatbot. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4):967–986.
Publicado
05/11/2024
Como Citar
ALMEIDA, José Gabriel Remigio Gama De; BARRETO, Mateus Da Silva; SANTOS, Rafael Gomes Oliveira; RODRIGUES, João Vítor Dias; SILVA, Gilton José Ferreira Da.
Uso de Inteligência Artificial Conversacional na Educação de Crianças: Um Mapeamento Sistemático. In: ESCOLA REGIONAL DE COMPUTAÇÃO BAHIA, ALAGOAS E SERGIPE (ERBASE), 24. , 2024, Salvador/BA.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2024
.
p. 205-214.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/erbase.2024.4491.
