Use of Games in Teaching Processor Architecture and Digital Systems: A Systematic Mapping

• William Gabriel Y. A. Braga UFS
• Pedro Vitor Lima de Almeida UFS
• Verônica dos Santos Nascimento UFS
• Gilton José Ferreira da Silva UFS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/erbase.2025.13754

Abstract

Context: The use of digital systems and processor architecture is essential but challenging in computing education due to its complexity. Objective: This study systematically maps research on the use of games in teaching these subjects, identifying methodologies, challenges, and educational impacts. Method: A systematic mapping study was conducted, using the PICOC method for research definition and selecting studies from academic databases based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The findings indicate that serious games, simulations, and gamification improve student engagement and comprehension, though challenges such as usability and methodological limitations remain. Conclusions: Games are a promising educational tool for digital systems and processor architecture, but further empirical research is needed to refine their implementation.

References

Beserra, K., Kessler, H., and da Rosa Junior, L. S. (2024). Odisseia 2d: Explorando caminhos lógicos. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE), pages 975–986. SBC.

de Menezes Gama, G. V., Fernandes, G. A., Junior, M. M. C., and Aylon, L. B. R. (2024). Jogando, aprendendo e construindo: Utilizando o minecraft como ferramenta de auxílio no ensino de circuitos digitais. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital (SBGames), pages 1223–1232. SBC.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., and Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining"gamification". pages 9–15.

Felder, R. M. (2002). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., and Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?–a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pages 3025–3034. Ieee.

Harris, S. and Harris, D. (2015). Digital design and computer architecture. Morgan Kaufmann.

Hennessy, J. L. and Patterson, D. A. (2011). Computer architecture: a quantitative approach. Elsevier.

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004):1–26.

Lazaretti, L. M. and Arrais, L. F. L. (2018). O que cabe no currículo da educação infantil? um convite à reflexão. Educação em Análise, 3(2):27–46.

Morris Mano, M. and Ciletti, M. D. (2012). Digital Design. Prentice Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 5 edition.

Oren, M., Pedersen, S., and Butler-Purry, K. L. (2020). Teaching digital circuit design with a 3-d video game: The impact of using in-game tools on students’ performance. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(1):24–31.

Pranantha, D., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., and De Gloria, A. (2012). A format of serious games for higher technology education topics: a case study in a digital electronic system course. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pages 13–17. IEEE.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3):223–231.

Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate: Journal of online education, 1(6).

Tene, T., Vique López, D. F., Valverde Aguirre, P. E., Cabezas Oviedo, N. I., Vacacela Gomez, C., and Bellucci, S. (2025). A systematic review of serious games as tools for stem education. Frontiers in Education, 10. Cited by: 0; All Open Access, Gold Open Access.

Vinod, S., Karen, B.-P., and Susan, P. (2008). Using video games to enhance learning in digital systems. In ACM. 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share, Toronto (Canada), pages 3–5.

Wu, Q., Zhu, Y., and Luo, Z. (2015). A gamification approach to getting students engaged in academic study. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 17(4):26–29.