Proteção e Sustentabilidade de Diretrizes de UX Inclusiva para Neurodivergentes
Resumo
Este artigo aborda os desafios da proteção, colaboração e sustentabilidade de diretrizes de UX inclusiva para pessoas neurodivergentes. Considerando tais diretrizes já desenvolvidas, analisa-se como garantir sua continuidade e impacto social em contextos digitais e terapêuticos. A pesquisa, do tipo overview, baseou-se em literatura, legislação e relatórios institucionais. Os resultados mostram que a Propriedade Intelectual tradicional não contempla plenamente heurísticas e práticas de acessibilidade cognitiva, apontando alternativas como licenças abertas e certificações voluntárias. Destaca-se ainda a co-criação e a formação de comunidades de prática, que legitimam e atualizam continuamente as diretrizes, desde que acompanhadas de protocolos éticos para dados sensíveis e do uso de personas anonimizadas. Por fim, discutem-se estratégias de monetização sustentável, como inovação aberta, licenciamento híbrido e certificações.
Palavras-chave:
UX inclusiva, Neurodivergência, Propriedade Intelectual, Inovação aberta, Sustentabilidade
Referências
Aguiar, Y. P. C., Galy, E., Godde, A., Trémaud, M., and Tardif, C. (2020). Autismguide: a usability guidelines to design software solutions for users with autism spectrum disorder. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(6):1132–1150.
Baran, A. and Zhumabaeva, A. (2018). Intellectual property management in startups — problematic issues. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(2):66–74.
BRASIL (1996). Lei nº 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 maio 1996.
BRASIL (1998a). Lei nº 9.609, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. dispõe sobre a proteção da propriedade intelectual de programa de computador. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998.
BRASIL (1998b). Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998.
BRASIL (2018). Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. dispõe sobre a proteção de dados pessoais e altera a lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014 (lei geral de proteção de dados pessoais – lgpd). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018.
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2):1–12.
Chamorro, L. S. et al. (2022). Justice in interaction design: Preventing manipulation in interfaces. arXiv preprint.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Crosta, V. (2015). Boas práticas na interação icts-empresas. Technical report, UNICENTRO. Acesso em: 20 set. 2022.
Day, S., Shah, V., Kaganoff, S., Powelson, S., and Mathews, S. (2022). Assessing the clinical robustness of digital health startups: Cross-sectional observational analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(6):e37677.
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO) (2024). Annual report 2024.
Gil, A. C. (2019). Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. Atlas, São Paulo, 7 edition.
Gwarda-Gruszczyńska, E. (2023). Intellectual property protection in startups. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiebiorstwie, 67(1):39–50.
International Organization for Standardization (2019). ISO/IEC 9241-210:2019 – Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International standard, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/IEC 9241-210:2019(E).
International Organization for Standardization (2021). ISO/IEC TR 24027:2021 – Information technology – Artificial intelligence (AI) – Bias in AI systems and AI-aided decision making. Technical report, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/IEC TR 24027:2021(E).
Lalitha, A. R. (2025). Beyond compliance: A user-autonomy framework for inclusive and customizable web accessibility. arXiv preprint.
Lee, P. and Sunder, M. (2017). The law of look and feel. Southern California Law Review, 90:529–590.
Lessig, L. (2004). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. Penguin.
López-Bouzas, P. et al. (2023). Gamified environments and serious games for students with autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(4):1523–1536.
Mimoso, I. et al. (2024). Co-creation in the development of digital therapeutics (dtx). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(12):1589.
Newbutt, N. et al. (2023). How are autistic people involved in the design of immersive technologies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53:546–560.
O’Sullivan, D., Murphy, E., Curley, A., Gilligan, J., Gordon, D., Becevel, A., Hensman, S., Rocha, M., Rivera, C., Collins, M., Gibson, J. P., Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Kearney, G., and Boland, S. (2023). Inclusion4eu: Co-designing a framework for inclusive software design and development. In Assistive Technology: Shaping a Sustainable and Inclusive World, volume 306 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pages 497–502. IOS Press.
Risch, M. (2014). Functionality and graphical user interface design patents. Working Paper Series No. 189.
Siebelink, N., van Dam, K., Lukkien, D., Boon, B., Smits, M., and van der Poel, A. (2024). Action opportunities to pursue responsible digital care for people with intellectual disabilities: Qualitative study. JMIR Mental Health, 11:e48147.
Stallman, R. (2002). Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. GNU Press.
Valencia, K., del Mazo, P., Molina, A., et al. (2024). Evaluating plantea: the practice of a ux evaluation methodology for people with asd. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24:1719–1746.
Valencia, K. et al. (2021). User experience factors for people with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Sciences, 11(21):10469.
Valencia, K. et al. (2022). A methodology to evaluate user experience for people with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Sciences, 12(22):11340.
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) (2024). World intellectual property indicators 2024.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.1. [link]. Acesso em: 20 set. 2025.
Zubair, M. et al. (2021). Designing accessible visual programming tools for children with autism spectrum condition. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21:845–860.
Baran, A. and Zhumabaeva, A. (2018). Intellectual property management in startups — problematic issues. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(2):66–74.
BRASIL (1996). Lei nº 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 maio 1996.
BRASIL (1998a). Lei nº 9.609, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. dispõe sobre a proteção da propriedade intelectual de programa de computador. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998.
BRASIL (1998b). Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998.
BRASIL (2018). Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. dispõe sobre a proteção de dados pessoais e altera a lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014 (lei geral de proteção de dados pessoais – lgpd). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018.
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2):1–12.
Chamorro, L. S. et al. (2022). Justice in interaction design: Preventing manipulation in interfaces. arXiv preprint.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Crosta, V. (2015). Boas práticas na interação icts-empresas. Technical report, UNICENTRO. Acesso em: 20 set. 2022.
Day, S., Shah, V., Kaganoff, S., Powelson, S., and Mathews, S. (2022). Assessing the clinical robustness of digital health startups: Cross-sectional observational analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(6):e37677.
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO) (2024). Annual report 2024.
Gil, A. C. (2019). Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. Atlas, São Paulo, 7 edition.
Gwarda-Gruszczyńska, E. (2023). Intellectual property protection in startups. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiebiorstwie, 67(1):39–50.
International Organization for Standardization (2019). ISO/IEC 9241-210:2019 – Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International standard, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/IEC 9241-210:2019(E).
International Organization for Standardization (2021). ISO/IEC TR 24027:2021 – Information technology – Artificial intelligence (AI) – Bias in AI systems and AI-aided decision making. Technical report, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/IEC TR 24027:2021(E).
Lalitha, A. R. (2025). Beyond compliance: A user-autonomy framework for inclusive and customizable web accessibility. arXiv preprint.
Lee, P. and Sunder, M. (2017). The law of look and feel. Southern California Law Review, 90:529–590.
Lessig, L. (2004). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. Penguin.
López-Bouzas, P. et al. (2023). Gamified environments and serious games for students with autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(4):1523–1536.
Mimoso, I. et al. (2024). Co-creation in the development of digital therapeutics (dtx). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(12):1589.
Newbutt, N. et al. (2023). How are autistic people involved in the design of immersive technologies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53:546–560.
O’Sullivan, D., Murphy, E., Curley, A., Gilligan, J., Gordon, D., Becevel, A., Hensman, S., Rocha, M., Rivera, C., Collins, M., Gibson, J. P., Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Kearney, G., and Boland, S. (2023). Inclusion4eu: Co-designing a framework for inclusive software design and development. In Assistive Technology: Shaping a Sustainable and Inclusive World, volume 306 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pages 497–502. IOS Press.
Risch, M. (2014). Functionality and graphical user interface design patents. Working Paper Series No. 189.
Siebelink, N., van Dam, K., Lukkien, D., Boon, B., Smits, M., and van der Poel, A. (2024). Action opportunities to pursue responsible digital care for people with intellectual disabilities: Qualitative study. JMIR Mental Health, 11:e48147.
Stallman, R. (2002). Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. GNU Press.
Valencia, K., del Mazo, P., Molina, A., et al. (2024). Evaluating plantea: the practice of a ux evaluation methodology for people with asd. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24:1719–1746.
Valencia, K. et al. (2021). User experience factors for people with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Sciences, 11(21):10469.
Valencia, K. et al. (2022). A methodology to evaluate user experience for people with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Sciences, 12(22):11340.
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) (2024). World intellectual property indicators 2024.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.1. [link]. Acesso em: 20 set. 2025.
Zubair, M. et al. (2021). Designing accessible visual programming tools for children with autism spectrum condition. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21:845–860.
Publicado
12/11/2025
Como Citar
CAMPOS JÚNIOR, Álvaro S.; NUNES, Eunice P. S.; FIGUEIREDO, Josiel Maimone de.
Proteção e Sustentabilidade de Diretrizes de UX Inclusiva para Neurodivergentes. In: ESCOLA REGIONAL DE INFORMÁTICA DE MATO GROSSO (ERI-MT), 14. , 2025, Pontes e Lacerda/MT.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2025
.
p. 80-89.
ISSN 2447-5386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/eri-mt.2025.17015.
