Perceptions of Faculty Members and Graduate Students on Guidelines in the Face of Use of Text Generative Artificial Intelligence
Resumo
Major scientific institutions worldwide have integrated ethics into their policies to promote sound scientific writing practices and to guide authors in the AI era. This article summarizes initial discussions on academic writing and presents a comparison of perspectives on the development of guidelines for scholars across four distinct academic disciplines in higher education. Additionally, we underscore the importance of understanding the perceptions of these academic participants, as this insight can support decision-making by academic leaders. Furthermore, this understanding is essential for reassessing technology literacy within the academic community, with the goal of preserving academic integrity.
Palavras-chave:
Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education, Scientific Writing, Technology Literacy
Referências
Brazil (2023) “Senado Federal. Projeto de Lei nº 2.338, de 03 de maio de 2023”, Senado Federal, https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/157233.
Comitê de Boas Práticas Científicas da Universidade de São Paulo (2023) “Guia de boas práticas científicas”, https://portal.if.usp.br/pesquisa/sites/portal.if.usp.br.pesquisa/files/guia_boas_praticas_cientificas_2ed_2023.pdf.
Committee on Publication Ethics (2023 “Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement”, COPE, https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author.
Consu (2024) “Dispõe sobre a Política Institucional de Boas Práticas e Integridade em Pesquisa da Universidade Estadual de Campinas e sobre a Comissão de Integridade em Pesquisa (CIP)”, CONSU, https://www.pg.unicamp.br/norma/31797/0.
Elsevier (2023) “The use of AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing”, https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/the-use-of-generative-ai-andai-assisted-technologies-in-writing-for-elsevier.
Foucault, M. (1969) “O Que é um Autor” In: Ditos e Escritos, III: Estética: Literatura e Pintura, Música e Cinema. 2 ed., Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2001. p. 264-298.
Nature (2023) “Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use”. Nature Editorial 613, 612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Pesquisa Fapesp (2023) “Os desafios para regulamentar o uso da inteligência artificial”. In Computing, p. 60-64. FAPESP, https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/os-desafios-pararegulamentar-o-uso-da-inteligencia-artificial/.
Science (2023) “Science Journals: Editorial Policies. Science”, https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorialpolicies.
Comitê de Boas Práticas Científicas da Universidade de São Paulo (2023) “Guia de boas práticas científicas”, https://portal.if.usp.br/pesquisa/sites/portal.if.usp.br.pesquisa/files/guia_boas_praticas_cientificas_2ed_2023.pdf.
Committee on Publication Ethics (2023 “Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement”, COPE, https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author.
Consu (2024) “Dispõe sobre a Política Institucional de Boas Práticas e Integridade em Pesquisa da Universidade Estadual de Campinas e sobre a Comissão de Integridade em Pesquisa (CIP)”, CONSU, https://www.pg.unicamp.br/norma/31797/0.
Elsevier (2023) “The use of AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing”, https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/the-use-of-generative-ai-andai-assisted-technologies-in-writing-for-elsevier.
Foucault, M. (1969) “O Que é um Autor” In: Ditos e Escritos, III: Estética: Literatura e Pintura, Música e Cinema. 2 ed., Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2001. p. 264-298.
Nature (2023) “Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use”. Nature Editorial 613, 612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Pesquisa Fapesp (2023) “Os desafios para regulamentar o uso da inteligência artificial”. In Computing, p. 60-64. FAPESP, https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/os-desafios-pararegulamentar-o-uso-da-inteligencia-artificial/.
Science (2023) “Science Journals: Editorial Policies. Science”, https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorialpolicies.
Publicado
27/11/2024
Como Citar
TORRES, Rai G.; LINHALIS, Flavia.
Perceptions of Faculty Members and Graduate Students on Guidelines in the Face of Use of Text Generative Artificial Intelligence. In: CONFERÊNCIA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ÉTICA EM INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL, 1. , 2024, Niteroi.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2024
.
p. 53-56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/laai-ethics.2024.32450.
