DOACROSS Parallelization Based on Component Annotation and Loop-Carried Probability

  • Luis Mattos UNICAMP
  • Divino Cesar UNICAMP
  • Juan Salamanca UNICAMP
  • João P. L. de Carvalho UNICAMP
  • Marcio Pereira UNICAMP
  • Guido Araujo UNICAMP

Resumo


Although modern compilers implement many loop parallelization techniques, their application is typically restricted to loops that have no loop-carried dependences (DOALL) or that contain well-known structured dependence patterns (e.g. reduction). These restrictions preclude the parallelization of many computational intensive DOACROSS loops. In such loops, either the compiler finds at least one loop-carried dependence or it cannot prove, at compile-time, that the loop is free of such dependences, even though they might never show-up at runtime. In any case, most compilers end-up not parallelizing DOACROSS loops. This paper brings three contributions to address this problem. First, it integrates three algorithms (TLS, DOAX, and BDX) into a simple openMP clause that enables the programmer to select the best algorithm for a given loop. Second, it proposes an annotation approach to separate the sequential components of a loop, thus exposing other components to parallelization. Finally, it shows that loop-carried probability is an effective metric to decide when to use TLS or other non-speculative techniques (e.g. DOAX or BDX) to parallelize DOACROSS loops. Experimental results reveal that, for certain loops, slow-downs can be transformed in 2× speed-ups by quickly selecting the appropriate algorithm.
Palavras-chave: Strips, Runtime, Program processors, Measurement, Parallel processing, Libraries, Benchmark testing
Publicado
24/09/2018
MATTOS, Luis; CESAR, Divino; SALAMANCA, Juan; CARVALHO, João P. L. de; PEREIRA, Marcio; ARAUJO, Guido. DOACROSS Parallelization Based on Component Annotation and Loop-Carried Probability. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE AND HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING (SBAC-PAD), 30. , 2018, Lyon/FR. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2018 . p. 29-32.