Investigating Accountability in Business-intensive Systems-of-Systems
Resumo
CONTEXT: The evolution of business processes has driven the integration of systems-of-systems (SoS) across various domains, leveraging technologies such as cloud computing, e-commerce platforms, and smart environments. In this context, the integration of various heterogeneous and independent constituents systems include information systems that collaborate to achieve business goals. Hence, the accountability of these systems must be a concern, but traditional accountability approaches can obscure the responsibility and ownership of data, processes, and outcomes. PROBLEM: This complexity often results in studies offering specific solutions, then highlighting the ongoing need for a shared understanding of accountability. Furthermore, establishing accountability as a quality requirement poses a significant challenge due to limited research and an undefined agenda for underlying challenges. SOLUTION: This paper presents an overview of accountability from reporting on the current landscape to proposing a research agenda to address existing challenges. METHOD: The study adopts a prescriptive approach based on a systematic mapping study. RESULTS: The study yields insights into accountability, and a research agenda when identifying seven topics for further investigation. CONCLUSION: By consolidating knowledge on accountability, this study facilitates the expansion of the body of knowledge on the field and brings new inquiry to inspire innovative solutions.
Palavras-chave:
Accountability, Systems-of-Systems, Business Aspects of Software Engineering, Systems-of-Information Systems, Roadmap
Referências
Ferreira, F. H. C. et al., A framework for the design of faulttolerant systems-of-systems. Journal of Systems and Software 211 (2024), pp. 112010. issn: 0164-1212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.112010.
Imamura, M. et al., A Catalog of Heuristics to Support the Design of Systems-of-Systems. iSys - Brazilian Journal of Information Systems 17.1 (Mar. 2024), pp. 1:1–1:26. DOI: 10.5753/isys.2024.3774.
Imamura, M. et al., System-of-Systems Reliability: An Exploratory Study in a Brazilian Public Organization. Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. SBSI ’21. Uberlândia, Brazil: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. isbn: 9781450384919. DOI: 10.1145/3466933.3466954.
Imamura, M. et al., Towards a Catalog of Heuristics for the Design of Systems-of-Systems. Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. SBSI ’23. Maceió, Brazil: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 128–135. isbn: 9798400707599. DOI: 10.1145/3592813.3592897.
Ferreira, F. H. C., Nakagawa, E. Y., and Santos, R. P., Towards an understanding of reliability of software-intensive systems-of-systems. Information and Software Technology 158 (2023), pp. 107186. issn: 0950-5849. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107186.
Maier, MarkW., Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering: The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering 1.4 (1998), pp. 267–284.
Fernandes, J. et al., PIS: Interoperability and Decision-Making Process—A Review. The Evolution of Pervasive Information Systems. Ed. by Kirsch Pinheiro, Manuele et al. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 157–190. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-18176-4_7.
Saleh, M. and Abel, M., System of Information Systems to Support Learners (A Case Study at the University of Technology of Compiègne). Behaviour & Information Technology 37.10 (2018). Publisher: Taylor & Francis, pp. 1097–1110. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1502808.
Graciano Neto, V. V. et al., Expanding Frontiers: Settling an Understanding of Systems-of-Information Systems. CoRR abs/2103.14100 (2021). arXiv: 2103.14100. url: [link].
Fernandes, J. et al.,Aconceptual model for systems-of-information systems. 2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI). IEEE. 2019, pp. 364–371. DOI: 10.1109/IRI.2019.00063.
Cordeiro, F. P. and Santos, R. P., Systems Thinking as a Resource for SupportingAccountability in System-of-Information-Systems: Exploring a Brazilian School Case. 2019 IEEE/ACM 7th InternationalWorkshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS) and 13thWorkshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (WDES). Canada, 2019, pp. 42–49. DOI: 10.1109/SESoS/WDES.2019.00014.
Cordeiro, F., “Accountability Evaluation in Systems-of-Information Systems Based on Systems Thinking”. PhD thesis. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UNIRIO, 2021. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35828.22402.
Pearson, S.,Accountability in Cloud Service Provision Ecosystems. Nordic Conference on Secure IT Systems. Springer, 2014, pp. 3–24. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11599-3_1.
Feltus, Christophe, Petit, Michaël, and Dubois, Eric, Strengthening employee’s responsibility to enhance governance of IT: COBIT RACI chart case study. Proceedings of the first ACM workshop on Information security governance. 2009, pp. 23–32.
Bissland, James H, Accountability gap: Evaluation practices show improvement. Public Relations Review 16.2 (1990), pp. 25–35.
AccountAbility, AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard. AccountAbility London, 2015.
Teixeira, P. G. et al., The Status Quo of Systems-of-Information Systems. 2019 IEEE/ACM 7th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS) and 13th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (WDES). IEEE, 2019, pp. 34–41. DOI: 10.1109/SESoS/WDES.2019.00013.
Gortmaker, J., Janssen, M., andWagenaar, R.W., Accountability of Electronic Cross-agency Service-delivery Processes. International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, 2005, pp. 49–56. DOI: 10.1007/11545156_5.
Feigenbaum, J., Jaggard, A. D., and Wright, R. N., Towards a Formal Model of Accountability. Proceedings of the 2011 New Security Paradigms Workshop. 2011, pp. 45–56. DOI: 10.1145/2073276.2073282.
Vance, A., Lowry, P. B., and Eggett, D., Using Accountability to Reduce Access Policy Violations in Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 29.4 (2013), pp. 263–289. DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290410.
Cordeiro, F. et al., Towards an accountability suggestion map for supporting information systems management based on systems thinking. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 21st International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI). IEEE. 2020, pp. 295–300. DOI: 10.1109/IRI49571.2020.00049.
Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., and Brereton, P., Evidencebased Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews. Vol. 4. CRC Press, 2015.
Inocencio, T. J. et al., Emergent Behavior in System-of-Systems: ASystematic Mapping Study. Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 2019, pp. 140–149. DOI: 10.1145/3350768.3350779.
Silva, K. C., Horita, F., and Graciano Neto, V. V., Bring Us MacGyver Predictor: Towards a Deep Learning-Based Mechanism to Design Emergent Behaviors in Systems-of-Systems. Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 2022, pp. 299–304. DOI: 10.1145/3555228.3555265.
Graciano Neto, V. V. et al., Model-based Engineering & Simulation of Software-intensive Systems-of-Systems: Experience Report and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings. 2018, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/3241403.3241432.
Nowicki, D., Randall, W. S., and Gorod, A., A framework for performance based logistics: A system of systems approach. 2010 International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, ICUMT 2010.2010, pp. 681–692. DOI: 10.1109/ICUMT.2010.5676562.
Zou, J., De Vaney, C., andWang, Y., A Meta-modeling Framework to Support Accountability in Business Process Modeling. Information Systems: Modeling, Development, and Integration. 2009, pp. 539–550. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2_54.
Singh, J. et al., Accountability in the IoT: Systems, Law, and Ways Forward. Computer 51.7 (2018), pp. 54–65. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2018.3011052.
Bhattacharya, S. and P., R., Accountability Issues in Multihop Message Communication. Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering and Technology. Mar. 1999, pp. 74–81. DOI: 10.1109/ASSET.1999.756754.
Janssen, M., Adaptability and Accountability of Information Architectures in Interorganizational Networks. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Macao, China, 2007, pp. 57–64. DOI: 10.1145/1328057.1328072.
Gateau, B. et al., An Agent-based Framework for Identity Management: The Unsuspected Relation with ISO/IEC 15504. 2008 Second International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. 2008-06-03, pp. 35–44. DOI: 10.1109/RCIS.2008.4632091.
Lourenço, R. P. and Serra, L., An Online Transparency for Accountability Maturity Model. International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, 2014, pp. 35–46. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_3.
Rogerson, S., Fairweather, N. B., andWu, X., Being Ethical in Developing Information Systems: An Issue of Methodology or Maturity in Judgment? (2001). DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2001.927150.
Chen, Y. C. et al., Cross-boundary E-government Systems: Determinants of Performance. Government Information Quarterly 36.3 (2019-07-01), pp. 449–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.001.
Singh, J., Cobbe, J., and Norval, C., Decision Provenance: Harnessing Data Flow for Accountable Systems. IEEE Access 7 (2019), pp. 6562–6574. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2887201.
Gottschalk, P., Descriptions of Responsibility for Implementation: A Content Analysis of Strategic Information Systems/Technology Planning Documents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68.2 (2001). Publisher: Elsevier, pp. 207–221. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00084-6.
Eriksén, S., Designing for Accountability. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2002, pp. 177–186. DOI: 10.1145/572020.572041.
Campagnolo, G. M. and Jacucci, G., Designing the Accountability of Enterprise Architectures. IFIP International Conference on Human Choice and Computers. Springer, 2006, pp. 355–366. DOI: 10.1145/572020.572041.
Chen, C. C, Liu, J. Y.h, and Chen, H., Discriminative effect of user influence and user responsibility on information system development processes and project management. Information and Software Technology 53.2 (2011), pp. 149–158.
Zhang, C. and Hu, B., Discussions about Perfecting Chinese System of Official Accountability for Mining Disasters. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). IEEE, 2011, pp. 70–75. DOI: 10.1109/ISCRAM.2011.6184081.
Shires, M. A. and Craig, M. S., Expanding Citizen Access and Public Official Accountability Through Knowledge Creation Technology: One Recent Development in E-democracy. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. IEEE, 2003, 10–pp. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174321.
Madon, S., Krishna, S., and Michael, E., Health Information Systems, Decentralisation and Democratic Accountability. Public Administration and Development 30.4 (2010). Publisher: Wiley Online Library, pp. 247–260. DOI: 10.1002/pad.571.
Stahl, B. C., Information Technology, Responsibility, and Anthropology. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2002, 10–pp. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994367.
Cain, P., Information, Not Technology, Is Essential to Accountability: Electronic Records and Public-sector Financial Management. The Information Society 17.4 (2001). Publisher: Taylor&Francis, pp. 247–258. DOI: 10.1080/019722401753330841.
Gajanayake, R., Iannella, R., and Sahama, T., Privacy by Information Accountability for E-health Systems. 2011 6th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems. IEEE, 2011, pp. 49–53. DOI: 10.1109/ICIINFS.2011.6038039.
Mutula, S. and Wamukoya, J. M., Public Sector Information Management in East and Southern Africa: Implications for FOI, Democracy and Integrity in Government. International Journal of Information Management 29.5 (2009). Publisher: Elsevier, pp. 333–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.04.004.
Gajanayake, R., Iannella, R., and Sahama, T., Sharing with Care: An Information Accountability Perspective. IEEE Internet Computing 15.4 (2011). Publisher: IEEE, pp. 31–38. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2011.51.
Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., and Bali, V., State Education Agencies, Information Systems, and the Expansion of State Power in the Era of Test-Based Accountability. Educational Policy 27.2 (2013). Publisher: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, pp. 217–247. DOI: 10.1177/0895904813475.
Pearson, S., Toward Accountability in the Cloud. IEEE Internet Computing 15.4 (2011). Publisher: IEEE, pp. 64–69. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2011.98.
Zou, J. and Pavlovski, C. J., Towards Accountable Enterprise Mashup Services. IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE’07). IEEE, 2007, pp. 205–212. DOI: 10.1109/ICEBE.2007.12.
Khadraoui, A. and Feltus, C., Service specification and service compliance: How to consider the responsibility dimension? Journal of Service Science Research 4 (2012). Publisher: Springer, pp. 123–142.
Von Bertalanffy, L., The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of management journal 15.4 (1972), pp. 407–426.
Lago, P., The Digital Society Is Already Here – Pity It Is ‘Unsustainable’. Connected World - Insights from 100 Academics on How to Build Better Connections. Ed. by Vermeulen, Ivar. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2023, pp. 55–58. url: [link].
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., and Kuzniarz, L., Guidelines for Conducting Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering: An Update. Information and Software Technology 64 (2015), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.
Cordeiro, F. et al., Supplementary Material - Investigating Accountability in Systems-of-Information Systems. 10.5281/zenodo.10251673. Dec. 2023.
Imamura, M. et al., A Catalog of Heuristics to Support the Design of Systems-of-Systems. iSys - Brazilian Journal of Information Systems 17.1 (Mar. 2024), pp. 1:1–1:26. DOI: 10.5753/isys.2024.3774.
Imamura, M. et al., System-of-Systems Reliability: An Exploratory Study in a Brazilian Public Organization. Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. SBSI ’21. Uberlândia, Brazil: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. isbn: 9781450384919. DOI: 10.1145/3466933.3466954.
Imamura, M. et al., Towards a Catalog of Heuristics for the Design of Systems-of-Systems. Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. SBSI ’23. Maceió, Brazil: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 128–135. isbn: 9798400707599. DOI: 10.1145/3592813.3592897.
Ferreira, F. H. C., Nakagawa, E. Y., and Santos, R. P., Towards an understanding of reliability of software-intensive systems-of-systems. Information and Software Technology 158 (2023), pp. 107186. issn: 0950-5849. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107186.
Maier, MarkW., Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering: The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering 1.4 (1998), pp. 267–284.
Fernandes, J. et al., PIS: Interoperability and Decision-Making Process—A Review. The Evolution of Pervasive Information Systems. Ed. by Kirsch Pinheiro, Manuele et al. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 157–190. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-18176-4_7.
Saleh, M. and Abel, M., System of Information Systems to Support Learners (A Case Study at the University of Technology of Compiègne). Behaviour & Information Technology 37.10 (2018). Publisher: Taylor & Francis, pp. 1097–1110. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1502808.
Graciano Neto, V. V. et al., Expanding Frontiers: Settling an Understanding of Systems-of-Information Systems. CoRR abs/2103.14100 (2021). arXiv: 2103.14100. url: [link].
Fernandes, J. et al.,Aconceptual model for systems-of-information systems. 2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI). IEEE. 2019, pp. 364–371. DOI: 10.1109/IRI.2019.00063.
Cordeiro, F. P. and Santos, R. P., Systems Thinking as a Resource for SupportingAccountability in System-of-Information-Systems: Exploring a Brazilian School Case. 2019 IEEE/ACM 7th InternationalWorkshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS) and 13thWorkshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (WDES). Canada, 2019, pp. 42–49. DOI: 10.1109/SESoS/WDES.2019.00014.
Cordeiro, F., “Accountability Evaluation in Systems-of-Information Systems Based on Systems Thinking”. PhD thesis. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UNIRIO, 2021. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35828.22402.
Pearson, S.,Accountability in Cloud Service Provision Ecosystems. Nordic Conference on Secure IT Systems. Springer, 2014, pp. 3–24. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11599-3_1.
Feltus, Christophe, Petit, Michaël, and Dubois, Eric, Strengthening employee’s responsibility to enhance governance of IT: COBIT RACI chart case study. Proceedings of the first ACM workshop on Information security governance. 2009, pp. 23–32.
Bissland, James H, Accountability gap: Evaluation practices show improvement. Public Relations Review 16.2 (1990), pp. 25–35.
AccountAbility, AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard. AccountAbility London, 2015.
Teixeira, P. G. et al., The Status Quo of Systems-of-Information Systems. 2019 IEEE/ACM 7th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS) and 13th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (WDES). IEEE, 2019, pp. 34–41. DOI: 10.1109/SESoS/WDES.2019.00013.
Gortmaker, J., Janssen, M., andWagenaar, R.W., Accountability of Electronic Cross-agency Service-delivery Processes. International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, 2005, pp. 49–56. DOI: 10.1007/11545156_5.
Feigenbaum, J., Jaggard, A. D., and Wright, R. N., Towards a Formal Model of Accountability. Proceedings of the 2011 New Security Paradigms Workshop. 2011, pp. 45–56. DOI: 10.1145/2073276.2073282.
Vance, A., Lowry, P. B., and Eggett, D., Using Accountability to Reduce Access Policy Violations in Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 29.4 (2013), pp. 263–289. DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290410.
Cordeiro, F. et al., Towards an accountability suggestion map for supporting information systems management based on systems thinking. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 21st International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI). IEEE. 2020, pp. 295–300. DOI: 10.1109/IRI49571.2020.00049.
Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., and Brereton, P., Evidencebased Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews. Vol. 4. CRC Press, 2015.
Inocencio, T. J. et al., Emergent Behavior in System-of-Systems: ASystematic Mapping Study. Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 2019, pp. 140–149. DOI: 10.1145/3350768.3350779.
Silva, K. C., Horita, F., and Graciano Neto, V. V., Bring Us MacGyver Predictor: Towards a Deep Learning-Based Mechanism to Design Emergent Behaviors in Systems-of-Systems. Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 2022, pp. 299–304. DOI: 10.1145/3555228.3555265.
Graciano Neto, V. V. et al., Model-based Engineering & Simulation of Software-intensive Systems-of-Systems: Experience Report and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings. 2018, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/3241403.3241432.
Nowicki, D., Randall, W. S., and Gorod, A., A framework for performance based logistics: A system of systems approach. 2010 International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, ICUMT 2010.2010, pp. 681–692. DOI: 10.1109/ICUMT.2010.5676562.
Zou, J., De Vaney, C., andWang, Y., A Meta-modeling Framework to Support Accountability in Business Process Modeling. Information Systems: Modeling, Development, and Integration. 2009, pp. 539–550. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2_54.
Singh, J. et al., Accountability in the IoT: Systems, Law, and Ways Forward. Computer 51.7 (2018), pp. 54–65. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2018.3011052.
Bhattacharya, S. and P., R., Accountability Issues in Multihop Message Communication. Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering and Technology. Mar. 1999, pp. 74–81. DOI: 10.1109/ASSET.1999.756754.
Janssen, M., Adaptability and Accountability of Information Architectures in Interorganizational Networks. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Macao, China, 2007, pp. 57–64. DOI: 10.1145/1328057.1328072.
Gateau, B. et al., An Agent-based Framework for Identity Management: The Unsuspected Relation with ISO/IEC 15504. 2008 Second International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. 2008-06-03, pp. 35–44. DOI: 10.1109/RCIS.2008.4632091.
Lourenço, R. P. and Serra, L., An Online Transparency for Accountability Maturity Model. International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, 2014, pp. 35–46. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_3.
Rogerson, S., Fairweather, N. B., andWu, X., Being Ethical in Developing Information Systems: An Issue of Methodology or Maturity in Judgment? (2001). DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2001.927150.
Chen, Y. C. et al., Cross-boundary E-government Systems: Determinants of Performance. Government Information Quarterly 36.3 (2019-07-01), pp. 449–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.001.
Singh, J., Cobbe, J., and Norval, C., Decision Provenance: Harnessing Data Flow for Accountable Systems. IEEE Access 7 (2019), pp. 6562–6574. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2887201.
Gottschalk, P., Descriptions of Responsibility for Implementation: A Content Analysis of Strategic Information Systems/Technology Planning Documents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68.2 (2001). Publisher: Elsevier, pp. 207–221. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00084-6.
Eriksén, S., Designing for Accountability. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2002, pp. 177–186. DOI: 10.1145/572020.572041.
Campagnolo, G. M. and Jacucci, G., Designing the Accountability of Enterprise Architectures. IFIP International Conference on Human Choice and Computers. Springer, 2006, pp. 355–366. DOI: 10.1145/572020.572041.
Chen, C. C, Liu, J. Y.h, and Chen, H., Discriminative effect of user influence and user responsibility on information system development processes and project management. Information and Software Technology 53.2 (2011), pp. 149–158.
Zhang, C. and Hu, B., Discussions about Perfecting Chinese System of Official Accountability for Mining Disasters. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). IEEE, 2011, pp. 70–75. DOI: 10.1109/ISCRAM.2011.6184081.
Shires, M. A. and Craig, M. S., Expanding Citizen Access and Public Official Accountability Through Knowledge Creation Technology: One Recent Development in E-democracy. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. IEEE, 2003, 10–pp. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174321.
Madon, S., Krishna, S., and Michael, E., Health Information Systems, Decentralisation and Democratic Accountability. Public Administration and Development 30.4 (2010). Publisher: Wiley Online Library, pp. 247–260. DOI: 10.1002/pad.571.
Stahl, B. C., Information Technology, Responsibility, and Anthropology. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2002, 10–pp. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994367.
Cain, P., Information, Not Technology, Is Essential to Accountability: Electronic Records and Public-sector Financial Management. The Information Society 17.4 (2001). Publisher: Taylor&Francis, pp. 247–258. DOI: 10.1080/019722401753330841.
Gajanayake, R., Iannella, R., and Sahama, T., Privacy by Information Accountability for E-health Systems. 2011 6th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems. IEEE, 2011, pp. 49–53. DOI: 10.1109/ICIINFS.2011.6038039.
Mutula, S. and Wamukoya, J. M., Public Sector Information Management in East and Southern Africa: Implications for FOI, Democracy and Integrity in Government. International Journal of Information Management 29.5 (2009). Publisher: Elsevier, pp. 333–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.04.004.
Gajanayake, R., Iannella, R., and Sahama, T., Sharing with Care: An Information Accountability Perspective. IEEE Internet Computing 15.4 (2011). Publisher: IEEE, pp. 31–38. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2011.51.
Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., and Bali, V., State Education Agencies, Information Systems, and the Expansion of State Power in the Era of Test-Based Accountability. Educational Policy 27.2 (2013). Publisher: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, pp. 217–247. DOI: 10.1177/0895904813475.
Pearson, S., Toward Accountability in the Cloud. IEEE Internet Computing 15.4 (2011). Publisher: IEEE, pp. 64–69. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2011.98.
Zou, J. and Pavlovski, C. J., Towards Accountable Enterprise Mashup Services. IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE’07). IEEE, 2007, pp. 205–212. DOI: 10.1109/ICEBE.2007.12.
Khadraoui, A. and Feltus, C., Service specification and service compliance: How to consider the responsibility dimension? Journal of Service Science Research 4 (2012). Publisher: Springer, pp. 123–142.
Von Bertalanffy, L., The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of management journal 15.4 (1972), pp. 407–426.
Lago, P., The Digital Society Is Already Here – Pity It Is ‘Unsustainable’. Connected World - Insights from 100 Academics on How to Build Better Connections. Ed. by Vermeulen, Ivar. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2023, pp. 55–58. url: [link].
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., and Kuzniarz, L., Guidelines for Conducting Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering: An Update. Information and Software Technology 64 (2015), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.
Cordeiro, F. et al., Supplementary Material - Investigating Accountability in Systems-of-Information Systems. 10.5281/zenodo.10251673. Dec. 2023.
Publicado
30/09/2024
Como Citar
CORDEIRO, Felipe; VASCONCELOS, Aline; SANTOS, Rodrigo Pereira dos; LAGO, Patricia.
Investigating Accountability in Business-intensive Systems-of-Systems. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE ENGENHARIA DE SOFTWARE (SBES), 38. , 2024, Curitiba/PR.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2024
.
p. 35-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbes.2024.3228.
