A platform for customization and publication of open educational games
Resumo
In a complex and expensive area, such as the development of educational games, solutions that advocate collaboration, sharing, and reuse are important in order to make possible the area advance and also encourage that these educational resources can be effectively used by their target audience: teachers and students. This article presents the REMAR1 platform which aims to make easier the creation and sharing of open educational games. Besides, this article presents the initial results obtained in the pilot tests involving the proposed platform usage by students, teachers and game developers.
Palavras-chave:
open educational resources, educational games
Referências
BONTCHEV, B. Customizable 3D Video Games as Educational Software. In: 7th Int. Conf. on Education and New Learning Technologies. Barcelona, Spain: EDULEARN15, 2015.
CONNOLLY, T.M.; BOYLE, E.A.; MACARTHUR, E.; HAINEY, T.; BOYLE, J.M. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, v. 59, n. 2, p. 661–686, 2012.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial, 1991.
GEE, J. Good Video Games + Good Learning: Collected Essays on Video Games, Learning, and Literacy. USA: P. Lang, 2007.
KIILI, K.; FREITAS, S. de; ARNAB, S.; LAINEMA, T. The Design Principles for Flow Experience in Educational Games. Procedia Computer Science, v. 15, p. 78–91, 2012.
KLOPFER, E.; OSTERWEIL, S.; SALEN, K. Moving learning games forward. The Education Arcade, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009.
NOGUEIRA, D.N.; CHAIMOWICZ, L.; PRATES, R.O. Pingo-An Online Portal for Educational Games with Customizable Content. In: XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Games e Entretenimento Digital. Brazil: SBC, 2013.
PRENSKY, M. Digital Game-Based Learning. USA: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
STEPHANDI, C. Design for All. In: The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd ed. USA: Interaction Design Foundation, 2018.
WILEY, D. The Access Compromise and the 5th R. 2019. Available at: [link]. Accessed on July 07, 2019.
CONNOLLY, T.M.; BOYLE, E.A.; MACARTHUR, E.; HAINEY, T.; BOYLE, J.M. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, v. 59, n. 2, p. 661–686, 2012.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial, 1991.
GEE, J. Good Video Games + Good Learning: Collected Essays on Video Games, Learning, and Literacy. USA: P. Lang, 2007.
KIILI, K.; FREITAS, S. de; ARNAB, S.; LAINEMA, T. The Design Principles for Flow Experience in Educational Games. Procedia Computer Science, v. 15, p. 78–91, 2012.
KLOPFER, E.; OSTERWEIL, S.; SALEN, K. Moving learning games forward. The Education Arcade, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009.
NOGUEIRA, D.N.; CHAIMOWICZ, L.; PRATES, R.O. Pingo-An Online Portal for Educational Games with Customizable Content. In: XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Games e Entretenimento Digital. Brazil: SBC, 2013.
PRENSKY, M. Digital Game-Based Learning. USA: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
STEPHANDI, C. Design for All. In: The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd ed. USA: Interaction Design Foundation, 2018.
WILEY, D. The Access Compromise and the 5th R. 2019. Available at: [link]. Accessed on July 07, 2019.
Publicado
11/11/2019
Como Citar
BEDER, Delano M.; OTSUKA, Joice L..
A platform for customization and publication of open educational games. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE INFORMÁTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO (SBIE), 30. , 2019, Brasília/DF.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2019
.
p. 902-911.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2019.902.
