Avaliando a experiência dos usuários com metodologias ativas nas aulas de Interação Humano-Computador
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta um estudo referente à experiência dos discentes em relação a um conjunto de metodologias ativas aplicadas nas aulas de um curso de Interação Humano-Computador. Para a coleta e análise dos dados foi utilizada uma plataforma que tem como infraestrutura um aplicativo para smartphones, uma base de dados em nuvem e disponibiliza diferentes técnicas de autorrelato para avaliar a experiência dos usuários. O estudo foi realizado com a participação de alunos de Ciência da Computação e Sistemas de Informação no decorrer do semestre letivo. As informações obtidas com o experimento piloto possibilitaram identificar os sentimentos hedônicos despertados nos discentes com a utilização dos diferentes tipos de metodologias ativas, possibilitando ao professor identificar as práticas pedagógicas que mais atraem a participação dos alunos.
Palavras-chave:
Metodologias Ativas, Interação Humano-Computador, Experiência do Usuário
Referências
Bacich, L. and Moran, J. (2018). “Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora: uma abordagem teórico-prática”. Penso Editora.
Bradley, M. M. and Lang, P. J. (1994). “Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential”. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25(1): 49–59.
Dalenberg, J. R., Gutjar, S., Horst, G. J., Graaf, K., Renken, R. J. and Jager, G. (2014). “Evoked emotions predict food choice”. PloS one 9 (12), e115388.
da Silva Júnior, J. B. and Kronbauer, A. H. (2018). “A Study of Hedonic Experience Related to UX Capture Techniques”. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 4.
Desmet, P., Hekkert, P. and Jacobs, J. (2000). “When a car makes you smile: Development and application of an instrument to measure product emotions”. Advances in consumer research 27 (1), 111–117.
Desmet, P. (2005). “Measuring emotions: Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products”. In Funology: from usability to enjoyment. 111–123.
Diesel, A., Baldez, A. L. S. and Martins, S. N. (2017). “Os princípios das metodologias ativas de ensino: uma abordagem teórica”. Revista Thema 14 (1), 268–288.
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M. and Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. 187–196.
Hayashi, E., Posada, J. E. G, Maike, L and Baranauskas, M. C. (2016). Exploring new formats of the Self-Assessment Manikin in the design with children. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 27.
Huang, X. and Dong, P. (2018). “Romantic Crushes Promote Variety-Seeking Behavior”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 226-242.
Kaasinen, E., Roto, V., Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., Jokinen, P. P. J., Karvonen, Tuuli Keskinen, H., Koskinen, H., Lu, Y., Saariluoma, P., Tokkonen, H. and Turunen, M. (2015). “Defining user experience goals to guide the design of industrial systems”. Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (10): 976–991.
Lachner, F., Naegelein, P., Kowalski, R., Spann, M. and Butz A. (2016). “Quantified UX: Towards a Common Organizational Understanding of User Experience”, proc. of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, 56.
Larson, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). “The experience sampling method”. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. 21–34.
Peedu, G. and Lamas, D. (2011). Minu Viljandi: A case study on the effects of introducing web 2.0 features in e-government services on the overall user experience perception. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM, 305–308.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. (2005). “Design de interação”. Bookman.
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A. and Mendelsohn G. A. (1989). “Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (3) 493–502.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. (1988). “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6), 1063–1070.
Xie, K., Heddy, B. C. and Greene, B. A. (2019). “Affordances of using mobile technology to support experience-sampling method in examining college students’ engagement”. Computers & Education, Vol. 128, 183–198.
Bradley, M. M. and Lang, P. J. (1994). “Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential”. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25(1): 49–59.
Dalenberg, J. R., Gutjar, S., Horst, G. J., Graaf, K., Renken, R. J. and Jager, G. (2014). “Evoked emotions predict food choice”. PloS one 9 (12), e115388.
da Silva Júnior, J. B. and Kronbauer, A. H. (2018). “A Study of Hedonic Experience Related to UX Capture Techniques”. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 4.
Desmet, P., Hekkert, P. and Jacobs, J. (2000). “When a car makes you smile: Development and application of an instrument to measure product emotions”. Advances in consumer research 27 (1), 111–117.
Desmet, P. (2005). “Measuring emotions: Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products”. In Funology: from usability to enjoyment. 111–123.
Diesel, A., Baldez, A. L. S. and Martins, S. N. (2017). “Os princípios das metodologias ativas de ensino: uma abordagem teórica”. Revista Thema 14 (1), 268–288.
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M. and Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. 187–196.
Hayashi, E., Posada, J. E. G, Maike, L and Baranauskas, M. C. (2016). Exploring new formats of the Self-Assessment Manikin in the design with children. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 27.
Huang, X. and Dong, P. (2018). “Romantic Crushes Promote Variety-Seeking Behavior”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 226-242.
Kaasinen, E., Roto, V., Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., Jokinen, P. P. J., Karvonen, Tuuli Keskinen, H., Koskinen, H., Lu, Y., Saariluoma, P., Tokkonen, H. and Turunen, M. (2015). “Defining user experience goals to guide the design of industrial systems”. Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (10): 976–991.
Lachner, F., Naegelein, P., Kowalski, R., Spann, M. and Butz A. (2016). “Quantified UX: Towards a Common Organizational Understanding of User Experience”, proc. of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, 56.
Larson, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). “The experience sampling method”. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. 21–34.
Peedu, G. and Lamas, D. (2011). Minu Viljandi: A case study on the effects of introducing web 2.0 features in e-government services on the overall user experience perception. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM, 305–308.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. (2005). “Design de interação”. Bookman.
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A. and Mendelsohn G. A. (1989). “Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (3) 493–502.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. (1988). “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6), 1063–1070.
Xie, K., Heddy, B. C. and Greene, B. A. (2019). “Affordances of using mobile technology to support experience-sampling method in examining college students’ engagement”. Computers & Education, Vol. 128, 183–198.
Publicado
11/11/2019
Como Citar
DA SILVA JUNIOR, João Batista; KRONBAUER, Artur; CAMPOS, Jorge.
Avaliando a experiência dos usuários com metodologias ativas nas aulas de Interação Humano-Computador. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE INFORMÁTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO (SBIE), 30. , 2019, Brasília/DF.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2019
.
p. 1201-1210.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2019.1201.
