Recomendações de Acessibilidade para Surdos dos Tipos de Questões Usadas na Avaliação Baseada em Computador em Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem
Resumo
Os tipos de questões que são usadas na Avaliação Baseada em Computador (CBA, do inglês Computer-Based Assessment) em Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem (AVAs) possuem problemas de acessibilidade no contexto de estudantes surdos. Devido a esses problemas, a interação dos estudantes surdos com os tipos de questões fica comprometida e, dessa maneira, os estudantes surdos podem ficar impedidos de utilizar os tipos de questões em AVAs como os demais estudantes. Este trabalho apresenta um conjunto de recomendações de acessibilidade para surdos dos tipos de questões usadas na CBA em AVAs. O conjunto de recomendações deste trabalho foi avaliado por especialistas em Tecnologia da Informação (TI) e por professoras surdas. Os resultados dessa avaliação determinaram posicionamentos positivos tanto sobre a utilidade do uso das recomendações, como em relação à sua precisão, clareza e completude.
Palavras-chave:
Acessibilidade, Estudantes Surdos, Avaliação Baseada em Computador, Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem
Referências
Abreu, P. M.; Prates, R. e O. Bernardino, E. L. A. (2010). “Recomendações de acessibilidade para projetos de TICs para alfabetização de crianças surdas”. Anais do XXXVII Seminário Integrado de Software e Hardware. CSBC, 1-7.
Beech, M. (2011). “Computer-based testing accommodations for students with disabilities”. Technical report. Ph.D. Learning Systems Institute. Florida State University. Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Florida Department of Education.
Bueno, J. F., Castilho, D, F, R, J., Garcia, S. e Borrego, R. (2007). “E-learning content adaptation for deaf students”. In Proc. 12 th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM, 271-275.
Canal, M.C. e García, L.S. (2014). “Research on Accessibility of Question Modalities Used in Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) for Deaf Education”. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 8514, pp 265-276.
Cawthon, S.W., Winton S.M., Garberoglio, C.L. e Gobble, M.E. (2011). “The effects of american sign language as an assessment accommodation for students who are deaf or hard of hearing”. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2):198-211.
Debevc, M., Povalej, M., Verli£, M. e Stjepanovi£, Z. (2007). “Exploring usability and accessibility of an e-learning system for improving computer literacy”. New Trends in ICT & Accessibility, 119-124.
Debevc, M., Stjepanovi£, Z. e Holzinger, A. (2012). “Development and evaluation of an e-learning course for deaf and hard of hearing based on the advanced adapted pedagogical index method”. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1):35-50.
Dolan, R.P., Burling, K.S., Harms, M., Beck, R., Hanna, E., Jude, J., Murray, E.A., Rose, D.H. e Way, W. (2010). “Universal design for computer-based testing guidelines”. Technical report. Pearson and CAST.
Drigas, A.S., Kouremenos, D., Kouremenos, S. e Vrettaros, J. (2005). “An e-learning system for the deaf people. Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training”. ITHET 2005. 6 th International Conference on, T2C/17-T2C/21.
Hubert, R. (2006). “Accessibility and usability guidelines for mobile devices in home health monitoring”. SIGACCESS Access. Comput., (84):26-29.
Khwaldeh S., Matar, N. e IHunaith, Z. (2007). “Interactivity in deaf classroom using centralised elearning system in jordan”. PGNet.
Luephattanasuk, N., Suchato, A. e Punyabukkana, P. (2011). “Accessible QTI presentation for web-based elearning”. In Proceedings of the International CrossDisciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. ACM, Article 26.
Pinelle, D., Wong, N., Stach, T. e Gutwin, C. (2009). “Usability heuristics for networked multiplayer games”. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, ACM, 169-178 .
Pivetta, E.M., Saito, D.S., Almeida, A.M.P. e Ulbricht, V.R. (2013). “Contribuições para o design de interface de um ambiente virtual de ensino aprendizagem acessível a surdos”. Infodesign, 10:193-206.
Pivetta, E.M., Saito, D.S. e Ulbricht, V.R. (2014). “Surdos e acessibilidade: análise de um ambiente virtual de ensino e aprendizagem”. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 20:147–162.
Russell, M. (2011). “Digital test delivery: Empowering accessible test design to increase test validity for all students”. White paper, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Russell, M., Hoffmann, T. e Higgins, J. (2009). “Meeting the needs of all students: A universal design approach to computer-based testing”. Journal of Online Education, 5(4).
Russell, M., Kavanaugh, M., Masters, J., Higgins, J. e Hoffmann, T. (2009). “Computer-based signing accommodations: Comparing a recorded human with an avatar.” Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 10(3).
Sim, G., Holifield, P. e Brown, M. (2004). “Implementation of computer assisted assessment: Lessons from the literature”. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(3), 215–229.
Straetz, K., Kaibel, A., Raithel, V., Specht, M., Grote, K. e Kramer, F. (2004). “An elearning environment for deaf adults”. Conference Proc. 8 th ERCIM Workshop User Interfaces for All.
Thompson, S.J., Thurlow, M.L., Quenemoen, R.F. e Lehr, C.A. (2002). “Access to computer-based testing for students with disabilities”. (synthesis report 45) Technical report. University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, Minneapolis.
W3C. (2014) “Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0.” [link].
Beech, M. (2011). “Computer-based testing accommodations for students with disabilities”. Technical report. Ph.D. Learning Systems Institute. Florida State University. Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Florida Department of Education.
Bueno, J. F., Castilho, D, F, R, J., Garcia, S. e Borrego, R. (2007). “E-learning content adaptation for deaf students”. In Proc. 12 th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM, 271-275.
Canal, M.C. e García, L.S. (2014). “Research on Accessibility of Question Modalities Used in Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) for Deaf Education”. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 8514, pp 265-276.
Cawthon, S.W., Winton S.M., Garberoglio, C.L. e Gobble, M.E. (2011). “The effects of american sign language as an assessment accommodation for students who are deaf or hard of hearing”. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2):198-211.
Debevc, M., Povalej, M., Verli£, M. e Stjepanovi£, Z. (2007). “Exploring usability and accessibility of an e-learning system for improving computer literacy”. New Trends in ICT & Accessibility, 119-124.
Debevc, M., Stjepanovi£, Z. e Holzinger, A. (2012). “Development and evaluation of an e-learning course for deaf and hard of hearing based on the advanced adapted pedagogical index method”. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1):35-50.
Dolan, R.P., Burling, K.S., Harms, M., Beck, R., Hanna, E., Jude, J., Murray, E.A., Rose, D.H. e Way, W. (2010). “Universal design for computer-based testing guidelines”. Technical report. Pearson and CAST.
Drigas, A.S., Kouremenos, D., Kouremenos, S. e Vrettaros, J. (2005). “An e-learning system for the deaf people. Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training”. ITHET 2005. 6 th International Conference on, T2C/17-T2C/21.
Hubert, R. (2006). “Accessibility and usability guidelines for mobile devices in home health monitoring”. SIGACCESS Access. Comput., (84):26-29.
Khwaldeh S., Matar, N. e IHunaith, Z. (2007). “Interactivity in deaf classroom using centralised elearning system in jordan”. PGNet.
Luephattanasuk, N., Suchato, A. e Punyabukkana, P. (2011). “Accessible QTI presentation for web-based elearning”. In Proceedings of the International CrossDisciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. ACM, Article 26.
Pinelle, D., Wong, N., Stach, T. e Gutwin, C. (2009). “Usability heuristics for networked multiplayer games”. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, ACM, 169-178 .
Pivetta, E.M., Saito, D.S., Almeida, A.M.P. e Ulbricht, V.R. (2013). “Contribuições para o design de interface de um ambiente virtual de ensino aprendizagem acessível a surdos”. Infodesign, 10:193-206.
Pivetta, E.M., Saito, D.S. e Ulbricht, V.R. (2014). “Surdos e acessibilidade: análise de um ambiente virtual de ensino e aprendizagem”. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 20:147–162.
Russell, M. (2011). “Digital test delivery: Empowering accessible test design to increase test validity for all students”. White paper, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Russell, M., Hoffmann, T. e Higgins, J. (2009). “Meeting the needs of all students: A universal design approach to computer-based testing”. Journal of Online Education, 5(4).
Russell, M., Kavanaugh, M., Masters, J., Higgins, J. e Hoffmann, T. (2009). “Computer-based signing accommodations: Comparing a recorded human with an avatar.” Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 10(3).
Sim, G., Holifield, P. e Brown, M. (2004). “Implementation of computer assisted assessment: Lessons from the literature”. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(3), 215–229.
Straetz, K., Kaibel, A., Raithel, V., Specht, M., Grote, K. e Kramer, F. (2004). “An elearning environment for deaf adults”. Conference Proc. 8 th ERCIM Workshop User Interfaces for All.
Thompson, S.J., Thurlow, M.L., Quenemoen, R.F. e Lehr, C.A. (2002). “Access to computer-based testing for students with disabilities”. (synthesis report 45) Technical report. University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, Minneapolis.
W3C. (2014) “Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0.” [link].
Publicado
26/10/2015
Como Citar
CANAL, Maíra Codo; GARCÍA, Laura Sánchez.
Recomendações de Acessibilidade para Surdos dos Tipos de Questões Usadas na Avaliação Baseada em Computador em Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE INFORMÁTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO (SBIE), 26. , 2015, Maceió/AL.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2015
.
p. 812-821.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2015.812.
