Ontological Semantic Search of Learning Objects: Experiments and Results

• João Carlos Gluz Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
• Luiz Rodrigo Jardim da Silva Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2014.837

Resumo

Generating relevant results in semantic searches typically involves the context of the search term, and may include, besides elements of the search context, other elements like the location, intention, variation of words and synonyms. Ontologies and metadata are important computational tools to bring the semantics for learning object queries. The semantic search system presented in this paper aims to retrieve learning objects organized by OBAA metadata. Its search engine supports the integration of multiple educational ontologies with the OBAA metadata ontology. However, when distinct ontologies need to interoperate, semantic compatibility problems can lead to unpredictable, ambiguous or incomplete results. The semantic search system used in this paper addresses these issues through a combination of ontology aligning and mapping mechanisms. This paper presents the mapping and alignment algorithms used in the search engine. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the quality of the information returned by the search from the point of view of users. These experiments showed positive results.

Palavras-chave: Semantic Search, Learning Objects, Ontologies, Metadata, Ontology Alignment

Referências

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001) The Semantic Web, Scientific American. May.

Bittencourt, I. I., Costa, E., Silva, S., Soares, E. (2009) A computational model for developing semantic web–based educational systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, v.22, n.4, p. 302 – 315.

Cohen, W., et al. (2003) A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks. Procs. of IJCAI-03 Workshop on Inf. Integration on the Web.

David, J., Euzenat, J., Scharffe, F., Santos, C. (2011) The Alignment API 4.0. Semantic Web, v.2, p.3-10.

Ehrig, M. (2007) Ontology alignment: bridging the semantic gap. Springer.

Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P. (2007) Ontology matching. Springer.

Gluz, J.C., Vicari, R. (2012) An OWL Ontology for IEEE-LOM and OBAA Metadata. Procs. of ITS 2012, Crete. LNCS. New York: Springer, 2012. v.7315. p.696 – 698.

Gunter, D. (2009) Semantic search. Bull. of the Amer. Soc. for Inf. Sci. and Tech., Oct-Nov, v.36, p.36.

Mizoguchi, R., Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J. (2007) Inside Theory-Aware & Standards-Compliant Authoring System, Procs. of SWEL’07, p.1-18.

NISO. (2004) National Information Standards Organization. Understanding Metadata. Bethesda, MD, USA: NISO Press.

Ochs, C., et al. (2011) Google Knows Who Is Famous Today – Building an Ontology From Search Engine Knowledge and DBpedia. Procs. of Fifth IEEE Int. Conf. on Semantic Computing.

Orengo ,V., Huyck, C. (2001) Stemming Algorithm for Portuguese Language. Procs. of the Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval.

Shvaiko, P.; Euzenat, J. (2011) Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.PP, no.99.

Sirin, E., Bulka, B., Smith, M. (2010), Terp: Syntax for OWL-friendly SPARQL Queries. In: 7th OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop. San Francisco.

Sujatha, R. et al. (2011) Semantic Search Engine: A Survey. International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, v.2. n.6, p.1806.

Teixeira, T.N., Campos, F. Braga, R., Santos,N. Mattos, E. (2012) BROAD Project: Semantic Search and Application of Learning Objects. IEEE Technology and Engineering Education (ITEE), v.7, n. 3, p.23-32.