Robô Sniper como ferramenta de ensino para as aulas de física no tiro parabólico

• Claudenir Rocha Alves Filho UFSM
• Gustavo Arthur Dutra UFSM
• Ricardo Dias Schirmer UFSM
• Anselmo R. Cukla UFSM
• Fernanda Pinto Mota UCPel
• Solon Bevilacqua UFG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbrlars_estendido.2024.244557

Resumo

The integration of robotics into education is becoming increasingly widespread, offering effective tools for teaching. Extensive literature highlights the potential of robotics in programming education and in enhancing problem-solving skills through competitions. Educational games are also effective in improving memorization and analytical skills in mathematics and physics. This study utilizes a sniper robot to teach physics, focusing on projectile motion with and without air resistance. The robot’s mechanical, electrical, and software components enable practical learning. The methodology includes theoretical classes, tests, and hands-on experiments. The results present a teaching plan and suggested exercises, emphasizing the robot’s effectiveness in classroom settings. The conclusion underscores the educational benefits of utilizing the launch robot in physics instruction.

Referências

João Piedade et al. “On Teaching Programming Fundamentals and Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics: A Didactic Experience with Pre-Service Teachers”. en. In: Education Sciences 10.9 (Aug. 2020), p. 214. ISSN: 2227-7102. DOI: 10.3390/educsci10090214. URL: [link] (visited on 07/28/2024).

Charoula Angeli. “The effects of scaffolded programming scripts on pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: Developing algorithmic thinking through programming robots”. en. In: International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 31 (Mar. 2022), p. 100329. ISSN: 22128689. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100329. URL: [link] (visited on 07/30/2024).

Kanika, Shampa Chakraverty, and Pinaki Chakraborty. “Tools and Techniques for Teaching Computer Programming: A Review”. In: Journal of Educational Technology Systems 49.2 (Dec. 2020). Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc, pp. 170–198. ISSN: 0047-2395. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520926971. URL: DOI: 10.177/0047239520926971 (visited on 07/30/2024).

Salomi Evripidou et al. “Educational Robotics: Platforms, Competitions and Expected Learning Outcomes”. en. In: IEEE Access 8 (2020), pp. 219534–219562. ISSN: 2169-3536. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042555. URL: [link] (visited on 07/28/2024).

Giuseppina Gerarda Barbieri, Rosa Barbieri, and Roberto Capone. “Serious Games in High School Mathematics Lessons: An Embedded Case Study in Europe”. en. In: Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17.5 (Apr. 2021), em1963. ISSN: 13058215, 13058223. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/10857. URL: [link] (visited on 07/28/2024).

Suliyanah et al. “Literature Review on The Use of Educational Physics Games in Improving Learning Outcomes”. en. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1805.1 (Mar. 2021), p. 012038. ISSN: 1742-6588, 1742-6596. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012038. URL: [link] (visited on 07/28/2024).

Edward Chi-Ping Lin. “High school students’ perceptions about the helpfulness of PhET simulations for learning physics”. en. Master of Philosophy. Queensland University of Technology, 2020. DOI: 10.5204/thesis.eprints.201913. URL: [link] (visited on 07/28/2024).

Y. N. Zhang and M. Q. An. “Structure and software architecture design of an extremely low-cost quadruped robot for education”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1931. ICAIE 2021: IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012007. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1931/1/012007.

Johannes Addido, Andrea C. Borowczak, and Godfrey B. Walwema. “Teaching Newtonian physics with LEGO EV3 robots: An integrated STEM approach”. In: EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19.6 (2023), em2280. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/13232. URL: DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/13232.

Ricardo Dias Schirmer et al. “Project of a Sentinel Robot Controlled with a Tracking Algorithm”. In: 2022 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2022 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2022 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE). 2022, pp. 241–246. DOI: 10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE56824.2022.9995943.

Michel Corci Batista, Polônia Altoé Fusinato, and Ricardo Brugnolle Blini. “Reflexões sobre a importância da experimentação no ensino de Física”. In: Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences 31.1 (2009), pp. 43–49.

Marcelo Lacortt, Alexandre Pitol Boeira, and Anselmo Rafael Cukla. “Uma prática de laboratório para equações diferenciais parciais: condução de calor em uma barra de cobre”. pt. In: Revista Educar Mais 5.4 (July 2021). Number: 4, pp. 839–848. ISSN: 2237-9185. DOI: 10.15536/reducarmais.5.2021.2404. URL: [link] (visited on 08/13/2024).

Ministério da Educação. Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para a Educação Básica. 2013. URL: [link] (visited on 07/31/2024).

Saadiah Yahya, Erny Ahmad, and Kamarularifin Abd Jalil. “The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning: A discussion”. In: International Journal of Education and Development using ICT 6.1 (2010).

Nian-Shing Chen, I-Chun Hung, and Chun-Wang Wei. “Developing ubiquitous learning system with robots for children’s learning”. In: 2010 Third IEEE international conference on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning. IEEE. 2010, pp. 61–68.

David Halliday, Robert Resnick, and Jearl Walker. “Fundamentos de física, volume 1: mecânica”. In: Rio de Janeiro, LTC (2008).

Karine Nayara Faria do Valle et al. “Métodos Numéricos de Euler e Runge-Kutta”. In: (2012).