Enactive Systems & Computing Mapping the terrain for Human-Computer Interaction research
Resumo
While the concept of enaction is not new, recent trends on the use of contemporary devices to interact with computational systems have attracted the attention in the field of interaction design. A quick look in the literature reveals different meanings for an enactive system, depending on the knowledge domain. This paper explores the subject by conducting a Systematic Literature Review to construct a big picture on the subject. Results reveal the paths being traced and issues still unexplored that offer opportunities for investigation in the human computer interaction field.
Referências
Bordegoni, M., 2010. Design tools based upon enactive interfaces. In Shuichi Fukuda, ed. Emotional Engineering: Service Development. Springer. pp. 78.
Bordegoni, M. & Cugini, U., 2009. Multimodal Perception-Action Interaction for the Exploitation of Enactive Knowledge. In Volume 2: 29th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B. ASME, pp. 983–990.
Bordegoni, M. & Cugini, U., 2013. Tools for Industrial Design: From Barriers to Enablers of Creativity. Computer-Aided Design and Applications.
Brereton, P. et al., 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), pp.571–583.
Davis, N., Comerford, M., et al., 2015. An Enactive Characterization of Pretend Play. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition - C&C ’15, pp.275–284.
Davis, N., Hsiao, C., et al., 2015. Drawing Apprentice : An Enactive Co-Creative Agent for Artistic Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. pp. 185–186.
Domingues, D. et al., 2014. Embodiments, visualizations, and immersion with enactive affective systems. In Proc. SPIE 9012, The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality 2014.
Fedeli, L. & Rossi, P.G., 2011. A study of teacher/student relations in a formal face-toface niversity context supported by online tools within an enactive pproach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, pp.673–678.
Flint, T. & Turner, P., 2015. Enactive appropriation. Ai & Society, pp.1–9.
Froese, T. et al., 2012. The enactive torch: A new tool for the science of perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5(4), pp.365–375.
Kaipainen, M. et al., 2011. Enactive Systems and Enactive Media: Embodied Human-Machine Coupling beyond Interfaces. Leonardo, 44(5), pp.433–438.
Kitchenham, B., 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(TR/SE-0401), p.28.
Laboratory of Research on Software Engineering (LaPES) -Computing Department of the Federal University of São Carlos (DC/UFSCar), 2010. StArt (State of Art through Systematic Review). Available at: http://lapes.dc.ufscar.br/tools/start_tool.
van der Linden, J. et al., 2011. Haptic reassurance in the pitch black for an immersive theatre experience. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. pp. 4686–4691.
Luyat, M. & Regia-Corte, T., 2009. The affordances : From James Jerome Gibson to the recent formal models of the concept. Annee Psychologique, 109(2), pp.297–332.
Nehaniv, C.L. et al., 2013. Interaction and experience in enactive intelligence and humanoid robotics. Artificial Life (ALIFE), 2013 IEEE Symposium on, pp.148–155.
Pacheco, B. a. & Souza-Concilio, I. a., 2013. Multimodal interfaces: An enactive approach. In 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2013 - Proceedings. pp. 51–58.
Pugliese, R. & Lehtonen, K., 2011. A framework for motion based bodily enaction with virtual characters. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6895 LNAI, pp.162–168.
Saidali, Y. et al., 2009. Aid to the interpretation of legal documents: A user-centered approach. In CORIA 2009 - Conférence en Recherche d’Information et Applications. pp. 457–468.
Todaro, E. et al., 2007. The Hand Dance : A Didactic Performance Platform. In International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting (ICHIM07): Proceedings,.
Di Tore, P.A., Discepolo, T. & Di Tore, S., 2013. Natural user interfaces as a powerful tool for courseware design in physical education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 9(2), pp.109–118.
Tall, D, Smith D., Piez C. 2008. Enactive control. In Mary Kathleen Heid, Glendon W. Blume, eds. Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Information Age Publishing Inc. pp. 213.
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E., 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. An International Journal of Complexity and, 1992, p.328.
Vernon, D. et al., 2007. A Survey of Artificial Cognitive Systems : Implications for the Autonomous Development of Mental Capabilities in Computational Agents. , 11(2), pp.151–180.
Bordegoni, M. & Cugini, U., 2009. Multimodal Perception-Action Interaction for the Exploitation of Enactive Knowledge. In Volume 2: 29th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B. ASME, pp. 983–990.
Bordegoni, M. & Cugini, U., 2013. Tools for Industrial Design: From Barriers to Enablers of Creativity. Computer-Aided Design and Applications.
Brereton, P. et al., 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), pp.571–583.
Davis, N., Comerford, M., et al., 2015. An Enactive Characterization of Pretend Play. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition - C&C ’15, pp.275–284.
Davis, N., Hsiao, C., et al., 2015. Drawing Apprentice : An Enactive Co-Creative Agent for Artistic Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. pp. 185–186.
Domingues, D. et al., 2014. Embodiments, visualizations, and immersion with enactive affective systems. In Proc. SPIE 9012, The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality 2014.
Fedeli, L. & Rossi, P.G., 2011. A study of teacher/student relations in a formal face-toface niversity context supported by online tools within an enactive pproach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, pp.673–678.
Flint, T. & Turner, P., 2015. Enactive appropriation. Ai & Society, pp.1–9.
Froese, T. et al., 2012. The enactive torch: A new tool for the science of perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5(4), pp.365–375.
Kaipainen, M. et al., 2011. Enactive Systems and Enactive Media: Embodied Human-Machine Coupling beyond Interfaces. Leonardo, 44(5), pp.433–438.
Kitchenham, B., 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(TR/SE-0401), p.28.
Laboratory of Research on Software Engineering (LaPES) -Computing Department of the Federal University of São Carlos (DC/UFSCar), 2010. StArt (State of Art through Systematic Review). Available at: http://lapes.dc.ufscar.br/tools/start_tool.
van der Linden, J. et al., 2011. Haptic reassurance in the pitch black for an immersive theatre experience. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. pp. 4686–4691.
Luyat, M. & Regia-Corte, T., 2009. The affordances : From James Jerome Gibson to the recent formal models of the concept. Annee Psychologique, 109(2), pp.297–332.
Nehaniv, C.L. et al., 2013. Interaction and experience in enactive intelligence and humanoid robotics. Artificial Life (ALIFE), 2013 IEEE Symposium on, pp.148–155.
Pacheco, B. a. & Souza-Concilio, I. a., 2013. Multimodal interfaces: An enactive approach. In 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2013 - Proceedings. pp. 51–58.
Pugliese, R. & Lehtonen, K., 2011. A framework for motion based bodily enaction with virtual characters. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6895 LNAI, pp.162–168.
Saidali, Y. et al., 2009. Aid to the interpretation of legal documents: A user-centered approach. In CORIA 2009 - Conférence en Recherche d’Information et Applications. pp. 457–468.
Todaro, E. et al., 2007. The Hand Dance : A Didactic Performance Platform. In International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting (ICHIM07): Proceedings,.
Di Tore, P.A., Discepolo, T. & Di Tore, S., 2013. Natural user interfaces as a powerful tool for courseware design in physical education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 9(2), pp.109–118.
Tall, D, Smith D., Piez C. 2008. Enactive control. In Mary Kathleen Heid, Glendon W. Blume, eds. Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Information Age Publishing Inc. pp. 213.
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E., 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. An International Journal of Complexity and, 1992, p.328.
Vernon, D. et al., 2007. A Survey of Artificial Cognitive Systems : Implications for the Autonomous Development of Mental Capabilities in Computational Agents. , 11(2), pp.151–180.
Publicado
04/07/2016
Como Citar
ARPETTI, Alessandro; BARANAUSKAS, M. Cecília C..
Enactive Systems & Computing Mapping the terrain for Human-Computer Interaction research. In: SEMINÁRIO INTEGRADO DE SOFTWARE E HARDWARE (SEMISH), 43. , 2016, Porto Alegre.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2016
.
p. 1621-1632.
ISSN 2595-6205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/semish.2016.9513.
