Respostas emocionais da variação linguística: Análise exploratória de rastreio ocular
Resumo
Um estudo exploratório de exposição de participantes às variantes de uma variável linguística saliente do ponto de vista social, a palatalização progressiva, foi realizado com o uso de rastreamento ocular, para examinar o processamento da variação linguística. Os resultados mostram que exposição à variante estigmatizada captou a atenção e aumentou a dilatação da pupila dos participantes, o que pode ser interpretado como evidência de uma resposta emocional.Referências
Boswijk, V., Loerts, H., e Hilton, N. H. (2020). Salience is in the eye of the beholder: increased pupil size reects acoustically salient variables. Ampersand, 7:100061.
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., e Lang, P. J. (2006). A multi-process account of startle modulation during affective perception. Psychophysiology, 43(5):486–497.
Bradley, M. M. e Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1):49–59.
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., e Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4):602–607.
Dalmaijer, E. S., Mathôt, S., e Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). PyGaze: an open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4):913–921.
Foucart, A., Santamaría-García, H., e Hartsuiker, R. J. (2019). Short exposure to a foreign accent impacts subsequent cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 129:1–9.
Freitag, R., Tejada, J., Brito, Í. D. V., Pinheiro, B., Silva, L. S., Cardoso, P., e Souza, V. R. A. (2020). Estudo piloto da relação entre o julgamento de traços linguísticos e expressões faciais. Cadernos de Linguística, 1(2):01–19.
Freitag, R. M. K. (2015). Socio-stylistic aspects of linguistic variation: schooling and monitoring effects. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 37(2):127–136.
Freitag, R. M. K. (2018). Saliência estrutural, distribucional e sociocognitiva. Acta scientiarum. Language and culture, 40(2):e41173–e41173.
Freitag, R. M. K. (2020). Effects of the linguistics processing: Palatals in brazilian portuguese and the sociolinguistic monitor. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 25(2):4.
Freitag, R. M. K. e Santos, A. d. O. (2016). Percepção e atitudes linguísticas em relação às africadas pós-alveolares em sergipe. A Fala Nordestina: entre a sociolinguística e a dialetologia. São Paulo: Blucher, pages 109–122.
Freitag, R. M. K. e Souza, G. G. A. (2016). O caráter gradiente vs. discreto na palatalização de oclusivas em sergipe. Tabuleiro de Letras, 10(2):78–89.
Ivanchenko, D., Rifai, K., Hafed, Z. M., e Schaeffel, F. (2021). A low-cost, highperformance video-based binocular eye tracker for psychophysical research. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 14(3):10.16910/jemr.14.3.3.
Kecskes, I. (2011). Salience in language production. In Salience and defaults in utterance processing, pages 81–102. De Gruyter Mouton.
Kerswill, P. e Williams, A. (2011). ”salience”as an explanatory factor in language change: evidence from dialect levelling in urban england. In Jones, M. C. and Esch, E., editors, Language Change, pages 81–110. De Gruyter Mounton.
Kret, M. E. e Sjak-Shie, E. E. (2019). Preprocessing pupil size data: Guidelines and code. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3):1336–1342.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Number 3. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W., Ash, S., Baranowski, M., Nagy, N., Ravindranath, M., e Weldon, T. (2006). Listeners’ sensitivity to the frequency of sociolinguistic variables. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 12(2):10.
Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T., Baranowski, M., e Nagy, N. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4):431–463.
Lang, P. J. e Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84(3):437–450.
Levon, E. e Fox, S. (2014). Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ing and th-fronting in britain. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(3):185–217.
Löw, A., Lang, P. J., Smith, J. C., e Bradley, M. M. (2008). Both predator and prey. Psychological Science, 19(9):865–873.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., e Theeuwes, J. (2011). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2):314– 324.
Nakakoga, S., Higashi, H., Muramatsu, J., Nakauchi, S., e Minami, T. (2020). Asymmetrical characteristics of emotional responses to pictures and sounds: Evidence from pupillometry. PLOS ONE, 15(4):e0230775.
Oliva, M. e Anikin, A. (2018). Pupil dilation reects the time course of emotion recognition in human vocalizations. Scientific Reports, 8(1):4871.
Partala, T. e Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59:185–198.
R Development Core Team (2009). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-070.
Reisenzein, R. (1983). The schachter theory of emotion: Two decades later. Psychological bulletin, 94(2):239.
Ribeiro, C. C. d. S. e Corrêa, B. T. R. d. A. (2018). Avaliação social da palatalização de/t, d/em sergipe. A Cor das Letras, 19(4Especial):109–123.
Schachter, S. e Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological review, 69(5):379.
Schachter, S. e Wheeler, L. (1962). Epinephrine, chlorpromazine, and amusement. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(2):121.
Souza Neto, A. F. d. (2008). Realizações dos fonemas/t/e/d/em aracaju sergipe.
Squires, L. (2016). Processing grammatical differences: Perceiving versus noticing. In Babel, A., editor, Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, pages 80–103. Cambridge.
Wendt, D., Dau, T., e Hjortkjær, J. (2016). Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:345.
Wickham, H. (2011). ggplot2. WIREs Computational Statistics, 3(2):180–185. eprint: https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wics.147.
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., e Lang, P. J. (2006). A multi-process account of startle modulation during affective perception. Psychophysiology, 43(5):486–497.
Bradley, M. M. e Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1):49–59.
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., e Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4):602–607.
Dalmaijer, E. S., Mathôt, S., e Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). PyGaze: an open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4):913–921.
Foucart, A., Santamaría-García, H., e Hartsuiker, R. J. (2019). Short exposure to a foreign accent impacts subsequent cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 129:1–9.
Freitag, R., Tejada, J., Brito, Í. D. V., Pinheiro, B., Silva, L. S., Cardoso, P., e Souza, V. R. A. (2020). Estudo piloto da relação entre o julgamento de traços linguísticos e expressões faciais. Cadernos de Linguística, 1(2):01–19.
Freitag, R. M. K. (2015). Socio-stylistic aspects of linguistic variation: schooling and monitoring effects. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 37(2):127–136.
Freitag, R. M. K. (2018). Saliência estrutural, distribucional e sociocognitiva. Acta scientiarum. Language and culture, 40(2):e41173–e41173.
Freitag, R. M. K. (2020). Effects of the linguistics processing: Palatals in brazilian portuguese and the sociolinguistic monitor. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 25(2):4.
Freitag, R. M. K. e Santos, A. d. O. (2016). Percepção e atitudes linguísticas em relação às africadas pós-alveolares em sergipe. A Fala Nordestina: entre a sociolinguística e a dialetologia. São Paulo: Blucher, pages 109–122.
Freitag, R. M. K. e Souza, G. G. A. (2016). O caráter gradiente vs. discreto na palatalização de oclusivas em sergipe. Tabuleiro de Letras, 10(2):78–89.
Ivanchenko, D., Rifai, K., Hafed, Z. M., e Schaeffel, F. (2021). A low-cost, highperformance video-based binocular eye tracker for psychophysical research. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 14(3):10.16910/jemr.14.3.3.
Kecskes, I. (2011). Salience in language production. In Salience and defaults in utterance processing, pages 81–102. De Gruyter Mouton.
Kerswill, P. e Williams, A. (2011). ”salience”as an explanatory factor in language change: evidence from dialect levelling in urban england. In Jones, M. C. and Esch, E., editors, Language Change, pages 81–110. De Gruyter Mounton.
Kret, M. E. e Sjak-Shie, E. E. (2019). Preprocessing pupil size data: Guidelines and code. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3):1336–1342.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Number 3. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W., Ash, S., Baranowski, M., Nagy, N., Ravindranath, M., e Weldon, T. (2006). Listeners’ sensitivity to the frequency of sociolinguistic variables. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 12(2):10.
Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T., Baranowski, M., e Nagy, N. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4):431–463.
Lang, P. J. e Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84(3):437–450.
Levon, E. e Fox, S. (2014). Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ing and th-fronting in britain. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(3):185–217.
Löw, A., Lang, P. J., Smith, J. C., e Bradley, M. M. (2008). Both predator and prey. Psychological Science, 19(9):865–873.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., e Theeuwes, J. (2011). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2):314– 324.
Nakakoga, S., Higashi, H., Muramatsu, J., Nakauchi, S., e Minami, T. (2020). Asymmetrical characteristics of emotional responses to pictures and sounds: Evidence from pupillometry. PLOS ONE, 15(4):e0230775.
Oliva, M. e Anikin, A. (2018). Pupil dilation reects the time course of emotion recognition in human vocalizations. Scientific Reports, 8(1):4871.
Partala, T. e Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59:185–198.
R Development Core Team (2009). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-070.
Reisenzein, R. (1983). The schachter theory of emotion: Two decades later. Psychological bulletin, 94(2):239.
Ribeiro, C. C. d. S. e Corrêa, B. T. R. d. A. (2018). Avaliação social da palatalização de/t, d/em sergipe. A Cor das Letras, 19(4Especial):109–123.
Schachter, S. e Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological review, 69(5):379.
Schachter, S. e Wheeler, L. (1962). Epinephrine, chlorpromazine, and amusement. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(2):121.
Souza Neto, A. F. d. (2008). Realizações dos fonemas/t/e/d/em aracaju sergipe.
Squires, L. (2016). Processing grammatical differences: Perceiving versus noticing. In Babel, A., editor, Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, pages 80–103. Cambridge.
Wendt, D., Dau, T., e Hjortkjær, J. (2016). Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:345.
Wickham, H. (2011). ggplot2. WIREs Computational Statistics, 3(2):180–185. eprint: https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wics.147.
Publicado
29/11/2021
Como Citar
FREITAG, Raquel Meister Ko.; TEJADA, Julian; ALMEIDA, René Alain Santana de; CARDOSO, Paloma Batista; SOUZA, Victor Renê Andrade; LEAL, Vanesca Carvalho.
Respostas emocionais da variação linguística: Análise exploratória de rastreio ocular. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO E DA LINGUAGEM HUMANA (STIL), 13. , 2021, Evento Online.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2021
.
p. 398-408.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/stil.2021.17820.
