Proposta de um framework de apoio à etapa de avaliação de soluções computacionais
Resumo
Evaluating a product is essential to understand whether or not the solution meets the defined requirements. In software development, a proper evaluation highlights issues that were not identified in earlier stages of development. However, to achieve a successful evaluation, it is necessary to consider different characteristics, from the target user to the environment in which the evaluation will be conducted, so selecting the proper evaluation method is essential. However, choosing the suitable method can be challenging, especially in Human-Computer Interaction, a field that thrives on its interdisciplinary nature. This project proposes an integrated framework combining tools from different domains to assist computing professionals and others in systematically applying these instruments.
Palavras-chave:
Framework, Avaliação, IHC, Emoframe
Referências
Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Bruno Santana da Silva, Milene Selbach Silveira, Isabela Gasparini, Ticianne Darin, and Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2021. Interação Humano-Computador e Experiência do Usuário. Autopublicação.
Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the selfassessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49–59.
Ricardo Brandt, Dafne Herrero, Thais Massetti, Tania Crocetta, Regiani Guarnieri, Carlos Monteiro, Maick Viana, Guilherme Bevilacqua, Luiz Abreu, and Alexandro Andrade. 2016. The Brunel Mood Scale Rating in Mental Health for Physically Active and Apparently Healthy Populations. Health 8 (01 2016), 125. DOI: 10.4236/health.2016.82015
John Brooke. 1995. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189 (11 1995).
A Engelmann. 1986. LEP–uma lista, de origem brasileira, para medir a presença de estados de ânimo no momento em que está sendo respondida. Ciência e Cultura 38, 1 (1986), 121–146.
Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology (1932).
Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 2003. Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual review of psychology 54, 1 (2003), 491–516.
Charles Egerton Osgood, George J Suci, and Percy H Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning. Number 47. University of Illinois press.
Suzane Santos dos Santos, Erick Modesto Campos, and Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues. 2022. EmoFrame: Prototype of a Framework to Assess Users’ Emotional Responses. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 282–301. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17615-9_20
David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 6 (1988), 1063.
Jerome A Yesavage, Terence L Brink, Terence L Rose, Owen Lum, Virginia Huang, Michael Adey, and Von Otto Leirer. 1982. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of psychiatric research 17, 1 (1982), 37–49.
Cristian Zanon, Micheline Roat Bastianello, Juliana Cerentini Pacico, and Claudio Simon Hutz. 2013. Desenvolvimento e validação de uma escala de afetos positivos e negativos. Psico-UsF 18, 2 (2013), 193–201.
Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the selfassessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49–59.
Ricardo Brandt, Dafne Herrero, Thais Massetti, Tania Crocetta, Regiani Guarnieri, Carlos Monteiro, Maick Viana, Guilherme Bevilacqua, Luiz Abreu, and Alexandro Andrade. 2016. The Brunel Mood Scale Rating in Mental Health for Physically Active and Apparently Healthy Populations. Health 8 (01 2016), 125. DOI: 10.4236/health.2016.82015
John Brooke. 1995. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189 (11 1995).
A Engelmann. 1986. LEP–uma lista, de origem brasileira, para medir a presença de estados de ânimo no momento em que está sendo respondida. Ciência e Cultura 38, 1 (1986), 121–146.
Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology (1932).
Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 2003. Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual review of psychology 54, 1 (2003), 491–516.
Charles Egerton Osgood, George J Suci, and Percy H Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning. Number 47. University of Illinois press.
Suzane Santos dos Santos, Erick Modesto Campos, and Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues. 2022. EmoFrame: Prototype of a Framework to Assess Users’ Emotional Responses. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 282–301. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17615-9_20
David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 6 (1988), 1063.
Jerome A Yesavage, Terence L Brink, Terence L Rose, Owen Lum, Virginia Huang, Michael Adey, and Von Otto Leirer. 1982. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of psychiatric research 17, 1 (1982), 37–49.
Cristian Zanon, Micheline Roat Bastianello, Juliana Cerentini Pacico, and Claudio Simon Hutz. 2013. Desenvolvimento e validação de uma escala de afetos positivos e negativos. Psico-UsF 18, 2 (2013), 193–201.
Publicado
14/10/2024
Como Citar
SANTOS, Suzane Santos dos; RODRIGUES, Marcus V. Santos; RODRIGUES, Kamila Rios da Hora.
Proposta de um framework de apoio à etapa de avaliação de soluções computacionais. In: WORKSHOP DE FERRAMENTAS E APLICAÇÕES - SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SISTEMAS MULTIMÍDIA E WEB (WEBMEDIA), 30. , 2024, Juiz de Fora/MG.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2024
.
p. 111-114.
ISSN 2596-1683.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/webmedia_estendido.2024.244390.
