The Do-it Method: An Experience Report about How to Teach Systematic Mappings to Undergraduate Students

• Pasqueline Dantas Scaico UFPB
• Alexandre Scaico UFPB
• José Samuel Assunção Luz UFPB
• Juliana Aragão UFPB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wei.2021.15899

Abstract

After years teaching courses of introduction to research, we understand that many undergraduate students fail to develop skills to systematize literature reviews processes properly. This paper describes the method Do-It, designed to support how students might learn how to perform systematic mappings. Its pedagogical actions include use of practices of active learning, cooperative work and situated learning. Some anecdotal evidence that emerged from applying Do-It suggests that it might be efficient way for teaching this content. The method is presented along with the description of its first application in a course of introduction to research methods. The steps of Do-It are presented intertwined with its application in a project involving 24 students. Finally, a summary of some findings that was arisen from the systematic review and the teaching experience are also presented.

Keywords: Systematic mapping, Method of teaching, Active learning

References

BRASIL. (2016) Resolução CNE/CES no 5. Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para os cursos de graduação na área da Computação. Diário Oficial [da República Federativa do Brasil], Brasília, DF, 16 de novembro

Braun, V. and Clark, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101

Gudolle, L. S., Antonello, A. S. and Flach, L. (2012) Aprendizagem situada, participação e legitimidade nas práticas de trabalho. RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie, São Paulo, v. 13, n. 1, p. 14-39

Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: Version 2.3. In: EBSE Technical Report. School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University. Disponível em: < pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e62d/bbbbe70cabcde3335765009e94ed2b9883d5.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 de jan. 2021

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991)_Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Liu, C. and Houdek, R. (2006) Teaching Computer Science Graduate Students Scholarly Literature Review Techniques. Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, California

Marin, M. J. S., Lima, E. F. G., Matsuyama, D. T., Silva, L. K. D., Gonzales, C., Deuzian, S. and Ilias, M. (2010) Aspectos das fortalezas e fragilidades no uso das Metodologias Ativas de Aprendizagem. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 34 (1): p.13–20

Niemeyer, D. J. and Gerber, H. R. (2015) Maker culture and Minecraft: Implications for the future of learning. Educational Media International, v. 52, n. 3, p. 216-226

OKOLI, Chitu. Guia para realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Tradução de David Wesley Amado Duarte; Revisão técnica e introdução de João Mattar. eaD em Foco, 2019;9 (1): e748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18264/eadf.v9i1.748