Charruas: Hunters and Gatherers – A Scenario for Evaluating Normative Agents
Abstract
In the last decades several agents model were created to reason about norms. However we have not found a scenario able to experiment and evaluate the commitment and the efficiency of agent behavior. In this sense, this paper offers a scenario where the agent needs to deliberate about norms and desires, considering available resources.References
Alechina, N., Dastani, M., and Logan, B. (2012). Programming norm-aware agents. In Conitzer, V., Winikoff, M., Padgham, L., and van der Hoek, W., editors, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2012), Valencia, Spain.
Behrens, T., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Huebner, J., Koester, M., Novak, P., and Schlesinger, F. (2012). The multi-agent programming contest. AI Magazine, 33(4):111–113.
Behrens, T. M., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Köster, M., and Novák, P. (2010). The multi-agent programming contest from 2005-2010 - from gold collecting to herding cows. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 59(3-4):277–311.
Boella, G. and van der Torre, L. W. N. (2004). Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In KR, pages 255–266.
Carabelea, C., Boissier, O., Castelfranchi, C., and Etienne, S.-g.-e. M. D. S. (2005). Using Social Power to Enable Agents to Reason About. pages 166–177.
Fullam, K. K., Klos, T. B., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Topol, Z., Barber, K. S., Rosenschein, J. S., Vercouter, L., and Voss, M. (2005). A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: Experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’05, pages 512–518, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Gaertner, D. and Toni, F. (2008). Preferences and assumption-based argumentation for conflict-free normative agents. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMAS’07, pages 94–113, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., and Shimada, S. (1999). Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, pages 739–746. IEEE Computer Society.
Meneguzzi, F. and Luck, M. (2009). Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pages 177–184. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Pacheco, N. C. (2012). Using Nnorms to Control Open Multi-Agent Systems. Tesis doctoral en informática, Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Schmitz, T. L. and Hübner, J. F. (2013). Raciocínio normativo organizacional para agentes: Uma abordagem anímica. In IV Workshop sobre Sistemas de Software Autônomos - AutoSoft 2013, pages 59–68.
Behrens, T., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Huebner, J., Koester, M., Novak, P., and Schlesinger, F. (2012). The multi-agent programming contest. AI Magazine, 33(4):111–113.
Behrens, T. M., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Köster, M., and Novák, P. (2010). The multi-agent programming contest from 2005-2010 - from gold collecting to herding cows. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 59(3-4):277–311.
Boella, G. and van der Torre, L. W. N. (2004). Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In KR, pages 255–266.
Carabelea, C., Boissier, O., Castelfranchi, C., and Etienne, S.-g.-e. M. D. S. (2005). Using Social Power to Enable Agents to Reason About. pages 166–177.
Fullam, K. K., Klos, T. B., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Topol, Z., Barber, K. S., Rosenschein, J. S., Vercouter, L., and Voss, M. (2005). A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: Experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’05, pages 512–518, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Gaertner, D. and Toni, F. (2008). Preferences and assumption-based argumentation for conflict-free normative agents. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMAS’07, pages 94–113, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., and Shimada, S. (1999). Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, pages 739–746. IEEE Computer Society.
Meneguzzi, F. and Luck, M. (2009). Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pages 177–184. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Pacheco, N. C. (2012). Using Nnorms to Control Open Multi-Agent Systems. Tesis doctoral en informática, Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Schmitz, T. L. and Hübner, J. F. (2013). Raciocínio normativo organizacional para agentes: Uma abordagem anímica. In IV Workshop sobre Sistemas de Software Autônomos - AutoSoft 2013, pages 59–68.
Published
2014-05-28
How to Cite
SCHMITZ, Tiago L.; HÜBNER, Jomi F..
Charruas: Hunters and Gatherers – A Scenario for Evaluating Normative Agents. In: WORKSHOP-SCHOOL ON AGENTS, ENVIRONMENTS, AND APPLICATIONS (WESAAC), 8. , 2014, Porto Alegre/RS.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2014
.
p. 161-166.
ISSN 2326-5434.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wesaac.2014.33296.
