Charruas: Caçadores e Coletores Um cenário para avaliação de agentes normativos
Resumo
Nas últimas décadas surgiram várias linguagens e modelos de agentes capazes de raciocinar sobre normas. Contudo não encontramos um cenário que permita experimentar e avaliar o comprometimento do agente e a eficiência do seu comportamento. Neste sentido propomos um cenário no qual o agente deve deliberar sobre normas e desejos, considerando recursos disponíveis.Referências
Alechina, N., Dastani, M., and Logan, B. (2012). Programming norm-aware agents. In Conitzer, V., Winikoff, M., Padgham, L., and van der Hoek, W., editors, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2012), Valencia, Spain.
Behrens, T., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Huebner, J., Koester, M., Novak, P., and Schlesinger, F. (2012). The multi-agent programming contest. AI Magazine, 33(4):111–113.
Behrens, T. M., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Köster, M., and Novák, P. (2010). The multi-agent programming contest from 2005-2010 - from gold collecting to herding cows. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 59(3-4):277–311.
Boella, G. and van der Torre, L. W. N. (2004). Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In KR, pages 255–266.
Carabelea, C., Boissier, O., Castelfranchi, C., and Etienne, S.-g.-e. M. D. S. (2005). Using Social Power to Enable Agents to Reason About. pages 166–177.
Fullam, K. K., Klos, T. B., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Topol, Z., Barber, K. S., Rosenschein, J. S., Vercouter, L., and Voss, M. (2005). A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: Experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’05, pages 512–518, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Gaertner, D. and Toni, F. (2008). Preferences and assumption-based argumentation for conflict-free normative agents. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMAS’07, pages 94–113, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., and Shimada, S. (1999). Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, pages 739–746. IEEE Computer Society.
Meneguzzi, F. and Luck, M. (2009). Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pages 177–184. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Pacheco, N. C. (2012). Using Nnorms to Control Open Multi-Agent Systems. Tesis doctoral en informática, Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Schmitz, T. L. and Hübner, J. F. (2013). Raciocínio normativo organizacional para agentes: Uma abordagem anímica. In IV Workshop sobre Sistemas de Software Autônomos - AutoSoft 2013, pages 59–68.
Behrens, T., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Huebner, J., Koester, M., Novak, P., and Schlesinger, F. (2012). The multi-agent programming contest. AI Magazine, 33(4):111–113.
Behrens, T. M., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Köster, M., and Novák, P. (2010). The multi-agent programming contest from 2005-2010 - from gold collecting to herding cows. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 59(3-4):277–311.
Boella, G. and van der Torre, L. W. N. (2004). Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In KR, pages 255–266.
Carabelea, C., Boissier, O., Castelfranchi, C., and Etienne, S.-g.-e. M. D. S. (2005). Using Social Power to Enable Agents to Reason About. pages 166–177.
Fullam, K. K., Klos, T. B., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Topol, Z., Barber, K. S., Rosenschein, J. S., Vercouter, L., and Voss, M. (2005). A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: Experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’05, pages 512–518, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Gaertner, D. and Toni, F. (2008). Preferences and assumption-based argumentation for conflict-free normative agents. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMAS’07, pages 94–113, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., and Shimada, S. (1999). Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, pages 739–746. IEEE Computer Society.
Meneguzzi, F. and Luck, M. (2009). Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pages 177–184. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Pacheco, N. C. (2012). Using Nnorms to Control Open Multi-Agent Systems. Tesis doctoral en informática, Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Schmitz, T. L. and Hübner, J. F. (2013). Raciocínio normativo organizacional para agentes: Uma abordagem anímica. In IV Workshop sobre Sistemas de Software Autônomos - AutoSoft 2013, pages 59–68.
Publicado
28/05/2014
Como Citar
SCHMITZ, Tiago L.; HÜBNER, Jomi F..
Charruas: Caçadores e Coletores Um cenário para avaliação de agentes normativos. In: WORKSHOP-ESCOLA DE SISTEMAS DE AGENTES, SEUS AMBIENTES E APLICAÇÕES (WESAAC), 8. , 2014, Porto Alegre/RS.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2014
.
p. 161-166.
ISSN 2326-5434.
