Does it make you shiver under your skin? Stating the importance of psychophysiological measures of well-being in player's experience
Resumo
Aspectos do bem-estar eudaimônico já são considerados componentes relevantes da avaliação da Player Experience em Games User Research. Para compreender como o bem-estar de um jogador pode ser afetado pela sua experiência em um jogo, é importante avaliá-lo não apenas através de instrumentos de autoreportados, que dependem de como os próprios jogadores conseguem recordar e descrever aspectos subjetivos das suas experiências, mas também por medidas psicofisiológicas, que podem fornecer dados mais confiáveis e ricos. Apesar de mais pesquisas serem necessárias para entender precisamente como as medidas fisiológicas refletem aspectos do bem-estar eudaimônico na PX, neste artigo de opinião argumentamos que esse entendimento é crucial para ir além da avaliação da PX no nível superficial e avaliar como os jogos repercutem no jogador em um nível mais profundo.
Palavras-chave:
Player Experience, Games User Research, Well-being, SDT, Psychophysiological Measures, PX Evaluation Instruments
Referências
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, 175.
Ballou, N., Denisova, A., Ryan, R., Rigby, C. S., and Deterding, S. (2024). The basic needs in games scale (bangs): A new tool for investigating positive and negative video game experiences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 188:103289.
Borges, J. B., Juy, C. L., de Andrade Matos, I. S., Silveira, P. V. A., and Darin, T. d. G. R. (2020). Player experience evaluation: a brief panorama of instruments and research opportunities. Journal on Interactive Systems, 11(1):74–91.
Carneiro, N., Darin, T., and Viana, W. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about location-based games evaluation? a systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13.
Darin, T., Carneiro, N., Miranda, D., and Coelho, B. (2020). Challenges in evaluating players’ interaction with digital games. In Forum on Grand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment, pages 1–24. Springer.
Drachen, A., Mirza-Babaei, P., and Nacke, L. E. (2018). Games user research. Oxford University Press.
DuPont, C. M., Weis, T. M., Manuck, S. B., Marsland, A. L., Matthews, K. A., and Gianaros, P. J. (2020). Does well-being associate with stress physiology? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 39(10):879.
Grimshaw, M., Lindley, C., and Nacke, L. (2008). Sound and immersion in the firstperson shooter: Mixed measurement of the player’s sonic experience. In Audio Mostlya conference on interaction with sound. www.audiomostly. com.
Komulainen, J., Takatalo, J., Lehtonen, M., and Nyman, G. (2008). Psychologically structured approach to user experience in games. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges, pages 487–490.
Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., and Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
Lee, W. and Reeve, J. (2017). Identifying the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation during task performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17:939–953.
Lee, W., Reeve, J., Xue, Y., and Xiong, J. (2012). Neural differences between intrinsic reasons for doing versus extrinsic reasons for doing: An fmri study. Neuroscience Research, 73(1):68–72.
Lindfors, P. (2012). Physiological correlates of mental well-being. Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health, pages 259–274
Maia, C. L. B. and Furtado, E. S. (2016). A study about psychophysiological measures in user experience monitoring and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–9.
Nunes, C. and Darin, T. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation of the intrinsic motivation inventory task evaluation questionnaire into brazilian portuguese. In Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–11.
O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., and Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (ues) and new ues short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112:28–39.
Poels, K., De Kort, Y., and Ijsselsteijn, W. (2007). ”it is always a lot of fun!”exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, pages 83–89
Ribeiro, G., Rogers, K., Altmeyer, M., Terkildsen, T., and Nacke, L. E. (2020). Game atmosphere: effects of audiovisual thematic cohesion on player experience and psychophysiology. In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, pages 107–119
Rigby, S. and Ryan, R. (2007). The player experience of need satisfaction (pens) model. Immersyve Inc, pages 1–22.
Robb, J., Garner, T., Collins, K., and Nacke, L. E. (2017). The impact of health-related user interface sounds on player experience. Simulation & Gaming, 48(3):402–427.
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic motivation inventory (imi). SelfDetermination Theory, An Approach to Human Motivation and Personality.
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research, pages 6229–6235. Springer
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., and Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion, 30:344–360.
Ryff, C. D. and Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(4):719.
Takatalo, J., H¨akkinen, J., Kaistinen, J., and Nyman, G. (2010). Presence, involvement, and flow in digital games. Evaluating user experience in games: Concepts and methods, pages 23–46
Tyack, A. and Mekler, E. D. (2020). Self-determination theory in hci games research: Current uses and open questions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–22.
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., and Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and emotion, 44(1):1–31.
Wiemeyer, J., Nacke, L., Moser, C., and ‘Floyd’Mueller, F. (2016). Player experience. Serious games: Foundations, concepts and practice, pages 243–271
Ballou, N., Denisova, A., Ryan, R., Rigby, C. S., and Deterding, S. (2024). The basic needs in games scale (bangs): A new tool for investigating positive and negative video game experiences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 188:103289.
Borges, J. B., Juy, C. L., de Andrade Matos, I. S., Silveira, P. V. A., and Darin, T. d. G. R. (2020). Player experience evaluation: a brief panorama of instruments and research opportunities. Journal on Interactive Systems, 11(1):74–91.
Carneiro, N., Darin, T., and Viana, W. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about location-based games evaluation? a systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13.
Darin, T., Carneiro, N., Miranda, D., and Coelho, B. (2020). Challenges in evaluating players’ interaction with digital games. In Forum on Grand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment, pages 1–24. Springer.
Drachen, A., Mirza-Babaei, P., and Nacke, L. E. (2018). Games user research. Oxford University Press.
DuPont, C. M., Weis, T. M., Manuck, S. B., Marsland, A. L., Matthews, K. A., and Gianaros, P. J. (2020). Does well-being associate with stress physiology? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 39(10):879.
Grimshaw, M., Lindley, C., and Nacke, L. (2008). Sound and immersion in the firstperson shooter: Mixed measurement of the player’s sonic experience. In Audio Mostlya conference on interaction with sound. www.audiomostly. com.
Komulainen, J., Takatalo, J., Lehtonen, M., and Nyman, G. (2008). Psychologically structured approach to user experience in games. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges, pages 487–490.
Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., and Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
Lee, W. and Reeve, J. (2017). Identifying the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation during task performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17:939–953.
Lee, W., Reeve, J., Xue, Y., and Xiong, J. (2012). Neural differences between intrinsic reasons for doing versus extrinsic reasons for doing: An fmri study. Neuroscience Research, 73(1):68–72.
Lindfors, P. (2012). Physiological correlates of mental well-being. Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health, pages 259–274
Maia, C. L. B. and Furtado, E. S. (2016). A study about psychophysiological measures in user experience monitoring and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–9.
Nunes, C. and Darin, T. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation of the intrinsic motivation inventory task evaluation questionnaire into brazilian portuguese. In Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–11.
O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., and Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (ues) and new ues short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112:28–39.
Poels, K., De Kort, Y., and Ijsselsteijn, W. (2007). ”it is always a lot of fun!”exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, pages 83–89
Ribeiro, G., Rogers, K., Altmeyer, M., Terkildsen, T., and Nacke, L. E. (2020). Game atmosphere: effects of audiovisual thematic cohesion on player experience and psychophysiology. In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, pages 107–119
Rigby, S. and Ryan, R. (2007). The player experience of need satisfaction (pens) model. Immersyve Inc, pages 1–22.
Robb, J., Garner, T., Collins, K., and Nacke, L. E. (2017). The impact of health-related user interface sounds on player experience. Simulation & Gaming, 48(3):402–427.
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic motivation inventory (imi). SelfDetermination Theory, An Approach to Human Motivation and Personality.
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research, pages 6229–6235. Springer
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., and Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion, 30:344–360.
Ryff, C. D. and Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(4):719.
Takatalo, J., H¨akkinen, J., Kaistinen, J., and Nyman, G. (2010). Presence, involvement, and flow in digital games. Evaluating user experience in games: Concepts and methods, pages 23–46
Tyack, A. and Mekler, E. D. (2020). Self-determination theory in hci games research: Current uses and open questions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–22.
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., and Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and emotion, 44(1):1–31.
Wiemeyer, J., Nacke, L., Moser, C., and ‘Floyd’Mueller, F. (2016). Player experience. Serious games: Foundations, concepts and practice, pages 243–271
Publicado
07/10/2024
Como Citar
BORGES, Bosco; DARIN, Ticianne.
Does it make you shiver under your skin? Stating the importance of psychophysiological measures of well-being in player's experience. In: WORKSHOP SOBRE INTERAÇÃO E PESQUISA DE USUÁRIOS NO DESENVOLVIMENTO DE JOGOS (WIPLAY), 3. , 2024, Brasília/DF.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2024
.
p. 1-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wiplay.2024.245484.
