Modelagem e Análise de Conformidade do Processo de Atracamento Molecular

• Miller Biazus UFRGS
• Lucinéia Heloísa Thom UFRGS
• Márcio Dorn UFRGS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/bresci.2016.10012

Abstract

The molecular docking process is complex, specially because it includes terms of a specialized vocabulary from the bioinformatics domain, which can lead to misundertandings between the stakeholders. This article proposes a validated and verified molecular docking process model using the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) as graphical notation. The process model exposes a common understanding - based on the bioinformatics literature and on the opinion of domain experts - on how the process should be defined and executed and is used as a starting point to perform a conformance analysis of two different molecular docking softwares.

 

References

Allweyer, T. (2010). BPMN 2.0. BoD.

Altman, R. B. and Dugan, J. M. (2005). Defining Bioinformatics and Structural Bioinformatics, pages 1–14. John Wiley Sons, Inc.

Ayutaya, N., Palungsuntikul, P., and Premchaiswadi, W. (2012). Heuristic mining: Adaptive process simplification in education. In ICT and Knowledge Engineering 2012 10th International Conference on, pages 221–227.

de Magalh˜aes, C. S., Almeida, D. M., Barbosa, H. J. C., and Dardenne, L. E. (2014). A dynamic niching genetic algorithm strategy for docking of highly flexible ligands. Information Sciences, pages 206–224.

Dhanik, A. and Kavraki, L. E. (2001). Protein–ligand interactions: Computational docking.

Dumas, M., Rosa, M. L., Mendling, J., and Reijers, H. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer.

Gehrke, N. and Werner, M. (2013). Process mining.

Goncalves, J., Santoro, F., and Baiao, F. (2009). Business process mining from group stories. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, 2009. CSCWD 2009. 13th International Conference on, pages 161–166.

Guedes, I. A., Magalh˜aes, C. S., and Dardenne, L. E. (2013). Receptor–ligand molecular docking. Biophysical Reviews, 6(1):75–87.

Mateja, K., Gregor, J., Marjan, H., and Gregor, P. (2015). Business process model and notation: The current state of affairs. Computer Science and Information Systems, 12:509, 539.

Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., and van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2010). Seven process modeling guidelines (7pmg). Inf. Softw. Technol., 52(2):127–136.

Recker, J. C. (2010). Opportunities and constraints : the current struggle with bpmn. Business Process Management Journal, 16(1):181–201.

Rozinat, A. and van der Aalst, W. (2008). Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Information Systems, 33(1):64 – 95.

Santoro, F. M., Borges, M. R. S., and Pino, J. A. (2010). Acquiring knowledge on business processes from stakeholders’ stories. Adv. Eng. Inform., 24(2):138–148.

Trott, O. and Olson, A. J. (2010). Autodock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry 31, pages 455–461.

van der Aalst, W. M. P. (1999). Woflan: A petri-net-based workflow analyzer. Syst. Anal. Model. Simul., 35(3):345–357.

Van Nuffel, D., Mulder, H., and Van Kervel, S. (2009). Enhancing the formal foundations of bpmn by enterprise ontology. In Advances in Enterprise Engineering III, volume 34 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 115–129. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.