Métricas para ontologias no formato OBO: Um estudo utilizando o Cytoscape
Resumo
A importância do papel das ontologias vem crescendo e, consequentemente também, seu tamanho e complexidade. Portanto, a avaliação de ontologias se torna essencial pois torna possível a determinação de algumas de suas características fundamentais que são importantes para projetar ontologias, melhorar qualidade das já existentes, prevenir e reduzir a necessidade de manutenção futura. Este trabalho aponta, através de revisão de literatura, alguns métodos de avaliação de ontologias e através deles, sugere um conjunto de métricas com o objetivo de relacionar o seu significado teórico ao significado na ontologia através de um experimento.
Palavras-chave:
ontologia, métricas, bioinformática, Cytoscape
Referências
Assenov, Y., Ramírez, F., Schelhorn, S., Lengauer, T., Albrecht, M., (2008), "Computing topological parameters of biological networks", Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), v. 24, n. 2 (Jan.), p. 282-284.
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., et al., (2000), "Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium", Nature Genetics, v. 25, n. 1 (Maio.), p. 25-29.
Cross, V., Pal, A., (2005), "Metrics for Ontologies". In: NAFIPS 2005 - 2005 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing SocietyNAFIPS 2005 - 2005 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, p. 448-453, Detroit, MI, USA.
Gangemi, A., Cantenacci, C., Ciaramita, M. And Lehmann, J. (2005) “A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation”, Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives SWAP2nd
Gómez-Pérez, A. (2003) “Ontology Evaluation”. In Handbook on Ontologies, pages 251-254
Ding,L , Finin, T., Joshi, A. , Pan, R. , Scott Cost, R. , Peng, Y., Reddivari, P., Doshi ,V., and Sachs,J. (2004). Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 652-659.
Noy, N. (2004) “Evaluation by Ontology Consumers”. IEEE Intelligent Systems 1541-1672
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., and Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 13(11):2498–2504.
Sure, Y. e Vrandecic, D. (2007) “How to Design Better Ontology Metrics”. In: 4th European Conference on The Semantic Web, pages 311–325
Welty, C., Kalra, R. and Chu-Carrol, J.(2003) “Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relashionships”. In Proceedings of the ISWC-03 Workshop on Semantic Integration
Yao, H., Orme, A. M., and Etzkorn, L. (2005). Cohesion metrics for ontology design and application. Journal of Computer Science, 1(1):107–113.
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., et al., (2000), "Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium", Nature Genetics, v. 25, n. 1 (Maio.), p. 25-29.
Cross, V., Pal, A., (2005), "Metrics for Ontologies". In: NAFIPS 2005 - 2005 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing SocietyNAFIPS 2005 - 2005 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, p. 448-453, Detroit, MI, USA.
Gangemi, A., Cantenacci, C., Ciaramita, M. And Lehmann, J. (2005) “A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation”, Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives SWAP2nd
Gómez-Pérez, A. (2003) “Ontology Evaluation”. In Handbook on Ontologies, pages 251-254
Ding,L , Finin, T., Joshi, A. , Pan, R. , Scott Cost, R. , Peng, Y., Reddivari, P., Doshi ,V., and Sachs,J. (2004). Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 652-659.
Noy, N. (2004) “Evaluation by Ontology Consumers”. IEEE Intelligent Systems 1541-1672
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., and Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 13(11):2498–2504.
Sure, Y. e Vrandecic, D. (2007) “How to Design Better Ontology Metrics”. In: 4th European Conference on The Semantic Web, pages 311–325
Welty, C., Kalra, R. and Chu-Carrol, J.(2003) “Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relashionships”. In Proceedings of the ISWC-03 Workshop on Semantic Integration
Yao, H., Orme, A. M., and Etzkorn, L. (2005). Cohesion metrics for ontology design and application. Journal of Computer Science, 1(1):107–113.
Publicado
19/07/2011
Como Citar
ASSAIFE, Ana Carolina Gama e Silva; SANTOS, Fernanda Bruno dos; SAMPAIO, Jonice de Oliveira; CAMPOS, Maria Luiza Machado.
Métricas para ontologias no formato OBO: Um estudo utilizando o Cytoscape. In: BRAZILIAN E-SCIENCE WORKSHOP (BRESCI), 5. , 2011, Natal/RN.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2011
.
p. 1013-1020.
ISSN 2763-8774.
