A Computational Platform for Building Databases for Neuroscience Experiments
Abstract
Open scientific data is fundamental to support better quality and higher impact reproducible science. The creation of open scientific databases involves a number of challenges, such as the creation of standardized representations of data and metadata from different domains of knowledge, as well as the development of computational resources to assist scientists in collecting and maintaining high-quality data. This paper presents a free software computational platform for the management and sharing of data from Neuroscience experiments. This platform allows to register data and metadata of experiments in a safe and user-friendly way, integrating data records of different types, such as clinical, electrophysiological and behavioral.
References
Chicurel, M. (2000). Databasing the brain. Nature, 406(6798):822–825.
Frishkoff, G., Sydes, J., Mueller, K., Frank, R., Curran, T., Connolly, J., Kilborn, K., Molfese, D., Perfetti, C., and Malony, A. (2011). Minimal information for neural electromagnetic ontologies (MINEMO): A standards-compliant method for analysis and integration of event-related potentials (ERP) data. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 5(2):211–223.
Ghosh, S., Nichols, N., Gadde, S., Steffener, J., and Keator, D. (2012). Xcede-dm: A neuroimaging extension to the W3C provenance data model. In Front. Neuroinform. Conference Abstract: 5th INCF Congress of Neuroinformatics.
Gibson, F., Overton, P. G., Smulders, T. V., Schultz, S. R., Eglen, S. J., Ingram, D., Panzeri, S., Bream, P., Sernagor, E., Cunningham, M., Echtermeyer, C., Simonotto, J., Kaiser, M., Swan, D. C., and Lord, P. (2009). Minimum information about a neuroscience investigation (MINI): electrophysiology. Nature Precedings.
Koslow, S. H. (2000). Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? Nature Neuroscience, 3:863–866.
Koslow, S. H. (2002). Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(4):311–313.
Kötter, R. (2001). Neuroscience databases: tools for exploring brain structure–function relationships. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 356(1412):1111–1120.
Moreau, L., Groth, P., Miles, S., Vazquez-Salceda, J., Ibbotson, J., Jiang, S., Munroe, S., Rana, O., Schreiber, A., Tan, V., and Varga, L. (2008). The provenance of electronic data. Communications of the ACM, 51(4):52–58.
Poldrack, R. A., Fletcher, P. C., Henson, R. N., Worsley, K. J., Brett, M., and Nichols, T. E. (2008). Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 40(2):409–414.
Ruiz-Olazar, M., Rocha, E. S., Rabaça, S. S., Ribas, C. E., Nascimento, A. S., and Braghetto, K. R. (2016). A review of guidelines and models for representation of provenance information from neuroscience experiments. In International Provenance and Annotation Workshop, pages 222–225. Springer.
Teeters, J. L., Godfrey, K., Young, R., Dang, C., Friedsam, C., Wark, B., Asari, H., Peron, S., Li, N., Peyrache, A., et al. (2015). Neurodata without borders: Creating a common data format for neurophysiology. Neuron, 88(4):629–634.
Frishkoff, G., Sydes, J., Mueller, K., Frank, R., Curran, T., Connolly, J., Kilborn, K., Molfese, D., Perfetti, C., and Malony, A. (2011). Minimal information for neural electromagnetic ontologies (MINEMO): A standards-compliant method for analysis and integration of event-related potentials (ERP) data. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 5(2):211–223.
Ghosh, S., Nichols, N., Gadde, S., Steffener, J., and Keator, D. (2012). Xcede-dm: A neuroimaging extension to the W3C provenance data model. In Front. Neuroinform. Conference Abstract: 5th INCF Congress of Neuroinformatics.
Gibson, F., Overton, P. G., Smulders, T. V., Schultz, S. R., Eglen, S. J., Ingram, D., Panzeri, S., Bream, P., Sernagor, E., Cunningham, M., Echtermeyer, C., Simonotto, J., Kaiser, M., Swan, D. C., and Lord, P. (2009). Minimum information about a neuroscience investigation (MINI): electrophysiology. Nature Precedings.
Koslow, S. H. (2000). Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? Nature Neuroscience, 3:863–866.
Koslow, S. H. (2002). Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(4):311–313.
Kötter, R. (2001). Neuroscience databases: tools for exploring brain structure–function relationships. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 356(1412):1111–1120.
Moreau, L., Groth, P., Miles, S., Vazquez-Salceda, J., Ibbotson, J., Jiang, S., Munroe, S., Rana, O., Schreiber, A., Tan, V., and Varga, L. (2008). The provenance of electronic data. Communications of the ACM, 51(4):52–58.
Poldrack, R. A., Fletcher, P. C., Henson, R. N., Worsley, K. J., Brett, M., and Nichols, T. E. (2008). Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 40(2):409–414.
Ruiz-Olazar, M., Rocha, E. S., Rabaça, S. S., Ribas, C. E., Nascimento, A. S., and Braghetto, K. R. (2016). A review of guidelines and models for representation of provenance information from neuroscience experiments. In International Provenance and Annotation Workshop, pages 222–225. Springer.
Teeters, J. L., Godfrey, K., Young, R., Dang, C., Friedsam, C., Wark, B., Asari, H., Peron, S., Li, N., Peyrache, A., et al. (2015). Neurodata without borders: Creating a common data format for neurophysiology. Neuron, 88(4):629–634.
Published
2018-07-26
How to Cite
BRAGHETTO, Kelly Rosa; ROCHA, Evandro Santos; RIBAS, Carlos Eduardo; DOS SANTOS, Cassiano Reinert Novais; RABAÇA, Sueli dos Santos; OLAZAR, Margarita Ruiz.
A Computational Platform for Building Databases for Neuroscience Experiments. In: BRAZILIAN E-SCIENCE WORKSHOP (BRESCI), 12. , 2018, Natal.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2018
.
p. 65-72.
ISSN 2763-8774.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/bresci.2018.3275.
